Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast
Showing results 1 to 20 of 145
  1. #1
    Ex Community Manager hoodoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006,May 9th
    Posts
    1,463

    Default Account sitting - Rule change

    After a lot of issues with the "old" account sitting rule we have dicided that the rule cannot stand that way it was.

    The new rules are effective immediately. Please read the rules carefully, even though they are not as strict anymore you still have to make sure you follow ALL rules.

    The Sitting rule was changed and a new rule was added. This is not to make it more complicated or to forbid more, but to make it easier to understand.

    ------------------

    §3) Account sitting

    While a player is account sitting for another player, no interactions (attack/supply/support/co-ordinated attacks or support) are allowed between any accounts played on the account sitters internet connection (including friends, family and colleagues on the same connection). That includes all accounts, that are being account sat by players on that connection.
    All interactions are forbidden until 24 hours after the account sitting mode has been canceled.
    It is not allowed to sit an account and use it just to push other accounts. Accounts that are clearly used as pushaccounts in this way will be banned.
    Everything stated in §2 has to be followed.
    Players and sitters are equally responsible for the actions of any sat account. Make sure you can trust the person you choose as sitter or whose account you are sitting.


    Examples:

    It is allowed for you to attack and conquer villages with the account you are account sitting.
    It is allowed for you to attack different players from the same tribe with your own account and the account you are account sitting for
    (i.e. separate attacks on separate players).
    It is forbidden to write a player to find out if he is in the account for an attack planned from another account on your connection.
    It is not allowed to use an account in any way that profits another account on the same connection.
    It is forbidden to support or attack another player on the same internet connection as the account sitter.
    It is not allowed to attack a player that is sat by anyone on your internet connection.
    It is strictly forbidden to attack or support the same player from your own account and the account you are sitting.
    It is forbidden to permanently play an account you are sitting just to push other accounts, even if the other accounts are on a different internet connection.
    It is forbidden to send one way resource transports without a benefit for the account (i.e. trade for villages or troops) from an account that is primarily sat and not played by its account owner.


    If you are sitting an account and you have realized that the account owner is not returning as promised, you may send in a support ticket (link) and ask for the account to be deleted.
    Accounts are only deleted if the account has been sat for at least 2 months and the same sitter has been in place for at least 1 month.
    (An account with active premium cannot be deleted because one of the advantages of premium is protection against deletion. The only exception would be if it is clearly visible that the account sitter purchased the premium account.)


    §4) Merging of accounts

    It is generally allowed for a player to allow one or more other players to take over the accounts villages without a fight.
    However, there are a few restrictions that have to followed:

    Accounts on the same internet connection may not merge.
    This includes accounts that have previously been played exclusivly or almost exclusively from the same internet connection.
    Account sitters may only give away villages from an account you are sitting if asked to do so by the account owner or if the account owner has not returned after 3 months of continuous sitting.
    (As always, the account sitter may NOT attack until at least 24 hours after the sitting has been cancelled.)
    The account sitter has to be able to prove that he was given permission to give the villages. A chatlog is not prove for a gifting permission.

    Examples:

    One way to leave proof that you give your sitter permission is to open a support request. (PLEASE set the support request to done yourself so that will not show up in our visible to-do list, but can be found if looked for.)
    Another way to leave proof is archiving an ingame message that was send by the original account owner. Please archive them in both the sitters and the sat account. (They should be archived so they don't get deleted by sitting around.)
    Please do not send e-mails to any staff members as proof, as those might not be found if needed.
    An account sitter is not allowed to gift resources to any other account even if he has permission to gift villages.
    Last edited by hoodoo : 2007,December 7th at 22:35

  2. #2
    Ex Community Manager hoodoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    2006,May 9th
    Posts
    1,463

    Default

    Just to show you the profedure, the rules are changed as of now, however, everything that happened until yesterday (or actually ealier today), is still handled looking at the OLD rules.

    This means that we still punish people and deal with reports for "old" cases.
    This is the only fair way.

    Again the reminder here. If you have broken the sitting/gifting rules and you report yourself, you will only have the nobled villages removed and the sitter also gets a smaller punishment.

  3. #3
    blocked Angalo's Avatar
    Join Date
    2007,August 19th
    Posts
    1,117

    Default

    Allright, I knew this was happening. I really like this. Ty hoodoo

  4. #4

    Default

    Seems fair enough to me, just didn't quite get this:

    It is forbidden to write a player to find out if he is in the account for an attack planned from another account on your connection.

    I think it might just be wrong wording though.

  5. #5

    Default

    What happens in the situation of you sitting someone for so long they just give you their villages?

  6. #6

    Default

    cheers, this will be a lot more popular than the first update, its nice to be playing a game where the staff listen to the players after an update and make the nessecary changes unlike the game i just came from (cough *stakingupdateonrs* uncough)

  7. #7

    Join Date
    2007,November 17th
    Location
    United State Of America
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I like this new rules now thanks hooboo..

  8. #8

    Default

    Nice stuff!

    I bet the T:V players from w1 are going to hate you for this lool

  9. #9

    Default

    where are big changes to the old rule???

  10. #10
    Flameafan's Avatar
    Join Date
    2007,August 4th
    Location
    World 11, 9 and 2 lol
    Posts
    12

    Default

    nice!
    Long Live Aten!!!
    WE WILL TAKE OVER WORLD 2 + 11!!
    Quote Originally Posted by Flameafan
    Aten wasn't build overnight! Atens enemies were destroyed overnight!
    I serve Dasler!

  11. #11

    Default

    this contradicts what i was told in my support request yesterday...

    I said me and my brother are on the same internet connection and someone in our tribe needs help, can we both support him.

    The responder said we cannot, but to get around this he said we could merge our accounts... I didn't know what he meant until i read this.

    However it clearly states there that people on the same internet connection cannot merge accounts. So if we had tried to merge we would have been both banned...

  12. #12

    Default

    Thanks for the clarification

  13. #13
    xankou's Avatar
    Join Date
    2007,January 6th
    Location
    Planet Earth. Mostly
    Posts
    247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoodoo View Post
    If you have broken the sitting/gifting rules and you report yourself, you will only have the nobled villages removed and the sitter also gets a smaller punishment.
    Small question, is the village deleted or returned to the original owner or abandoned?
    Your argument is invalid

  14. #14

    Join Date
    2007,September 3rd
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Account sitters may only give away villages from an account you are sitting if asked to do so by the account owner or if the account owner has not returned after 3 months or continuous sitting.

    just to clarify please:

    so, if the acc sitter hasnt returned within 3 months, i can give away villages or take them myself without getting permission?

  15. #15
    blocked
    Join Date
    2007,September 3rd
    Posts
    5,684

    Default

    4 is a little strange if u dont know english very well

  16. #16
    blocked
    Join Date
    2007,September 3rd
    Posts
    5,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cookiecop View Post
    this contradicts what i was told in my support request yesterday...

    I said me and my brother are on the same internet connection and someone in our tribe needs help, can we both support him.

    The responder said we cannot, but to get around this he said we could merge our accounts... I didn't know what he meant until i read this.

    However it clearly states there that people on the same internet connection cannot merge accounts. So if we had tried to merge we would have been both banned...
    what ? u cant send suport from 2 players if u sitt both of them?

  17. #17

    Join Date
    2006,December 19th
    Posts
    2,783

    Default

    woohoo i have around 60+ intribe claims finally im going to shoot up in pts and we can get back to warring

    If only this rule was brought in a week ago i wouldnt have lost two good mates on this game

  18. #18
    pimpometer's Avatar
    Join Date
    2007,November 11th
    Location
    pickleville.
    Posts
    1,501

    Default

    donno about u guyz, but these rules dont affect me at all
    Quote Originally Posted by Aukou
    LC are not farming units, and that's about it.
    Once you over farm then they're useless; you can only dodge attacks with them.

  19. #19
    blocked
    Join Date
    2007,September 3rd
    Posts
    5,684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stressy View Post

    so, if the acc sitter hasnt returned within 3 months, i can give away villages or take them myself without getting permission?
    if u want them in 2 months ?

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hoodoo View Post
    §4) Merging of accounts

    It is generally allowed for a player to allow one or more other players to take over the accounts villages without a fight.
    However, there are a few restrictions that have to followed:

    Accounts on the same internet connection may not merge.
    This includes accounts that have previously been played exclusivly or almost exclusively from the same internet connection.
    Account sitters may only give away villages from an account you are sitting if asked to do so by the account owner or if the account owner has not returned after 3 months or continuous sitting.
    This is not clear to me.

    If I am sitting someone, have been for several weeks, and they want to gift their villages to me...can I, as the sitter, attack and take their villages? I am capable of proving they are willingly giving me their villages.

Page 1 of 8 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •