If There Were No Tribes

[MooMix1]

If this was Player Wars, who do you think would be up at the top? You may be quick to name someone currently in the top 100, but keep in mind that some merely feed off their tribes inactives and require permanent support.

Personally, I think Ussike and N1ckV would be amongst the best. They clearly have the ability to survive and I think they could manage to make their way to the top if everyone was on their own.


I hope this kind of topic is allowed. :o

[Slayertallica]

We saw what happened to N1ck when no one supported him.


I think...It would be a cool world. No clue who would be tops.

[think2know80]

Moomix1. He stood long and is still here. (No, I really do believe you are pretty good)

[jay42]

Interesting idea

Valth classed as skilled too? Personally not in a position to say the best in the world today...

Player Wars...^^

[Slayertallica]

Originally Posted by jay42 Interesting idea Valth classed as skilled too? Personally not in a position to say the best in the world today... Player Wars...^^ >

His support was pretty skilled.

[Piaf]

That is a very good question, and i'd like to point out that by stating that this is Player Wars, all kinds of ranks should be ignored, including OD which is often tribe mates support. Having said that the players with top ranks would probably be at the top, especially proteroman.

Also I imagine some guy who gets into say K32 (that ring) would do better as there would be more noobs, and easier to grow to a decent size before any real combat.

Cool question, I really like it

[mountainboy965]

Even if it were a Player Wars, many players would get the idea to join together and support each other, and would probably make off-site websites for their "Tribe," granted it'd be much harder.

Given that, I think a "Player Wars" would be an interesting world, it would definately making growing a lot harder, and would require more skill for both attacking and defending.

[jay42]

Originally Posted by Slayertallica His support was pretty skilled. >

Read the sentence afterwards >.<

[Slayertallica]

I think. What we should look towards is the people that were most aggressive at the beginning of the world. Those people are normally the ones that would do best on their own for the longest as they were able to eliminate their nearby opponents quickly and grow faster.

Then again, constantly attacking can wear one down as well.

[RMJ118]

this is hard to answer for who would be best, since, like piaf said, you can't trust any of the stats that TW gives you normally in this case, as they can all be affected by tribes.

[Chuckiie]

And who do you think would get rimmed fast?

My vote for that one goes to... guess who

[violett]

wow i like this idea =D
well, concidering it would be player wars, they would also probably change the rules like, u wouldnt be able to support someone, only urself... and yea, as piaf said, you cant rly rely on the tw stats since anything could be affected by the tribe... pretty hard question u gave us there moo :P

as to who i personally think would be a good player on their own... hmm.... i donno, i guess iceilater, very strategic person i must say and this game is all bout strategies.. so yea lol, just my opinion.

[Snorlax-]

I think....

Skullkid and Demon would do well, skullkid would mail spam them and Demon would just kill them o.O Lol :D




Enjo67 would've done well, VPS1992 can and has held his own, when he was below a million points he rimmed a player single handidly around the same points quickly, real quick.

More skill on the rim than you'd believe.


I'mma chuck Chuckiie some slack and say he'd do well, I've seen some of Hulk's work and its pretty good.




TilenM would be up there imo. Perhaps some plague members.... A lot of tribes have one or two good players that could hold there own, these can hold a tribe together.





Interesting, I'll go ahead and say TilenM would do well.

[Rogue Prince]

I kind of hate to say this, but I think anarqy could be number one in such a game.
auntbeannie might be near the top too, but I think the rest of the top 20 could be crossed off.

[Snorlax-]

I forgot anarqy, yeah give him credit he's a good player



There are quite a lot of good players really, just the bad players outnumber them :D

[IloveTheRain]

Oviz would run over everyone .

But there would be many personal NAPs who would attack same players together, it is simply too hard to rim player the same size ,if he is active enough and knows how to move some troops around. And world would have to have much less players, It is too time consuming for single player to control same amount of villages, as whole tribe. And players would be quitting much more, because many haven't quit just because they have a tribe to have fun together.

That said, the players, who would have the highest def/off ratio would win.

[mattyp48]

I honestly think Anarqy would be up there. Love him or hate him he knows how to play and he proved that when he was surrounded by us, wow and Raw back when he was a member of Templar, the fact he is still going letalone having over two million points is pretty damn impressive.

Apart from that N1ckV has already kind of proved he can do it when he survived a war ith DNS without the aid of his tribe.

Personally if there was a world that was a player war world I think people would just gang up and place their tribe lists in heir personal text area and have off site forums...

[--jimbo--]

I think it would be a great idea to have that but looking at what mountainboy said you could just not allow support to other players :D i also think growth should be much easier like getting nobles.

[mattyp48]

but apart from those two I just mentioned my real vote goes to WorldWarrior, he would have owned all