World 16 Milestones

DeletedUser

Guest
you still need nukes for that though, and small tribes etc wont be able to make any more of them that quickly
 

DeletedUser

Guest
haza teh great said:
i doubt it will happen that quickly, if much difference is made at all it will be a while before it has any impact i think
Click to expand...

I reckon it'll make an immediate impact on internal nobling. I expect to see the top four become more active. In terms of everything else, I agree that it'll either be more of a long term impact or next to no impact.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
for most tribes they sit back and just leech off other bigger tribes which means they dont lose much. So essentially tribes MK and Ni sized should look into this little advantage
 

DeletedUser78416

Guest
Maybe I misread the terms, but I thought that 2/3rds of the world players had to vote yes, not 2/3rds of the players that voted.

If that was the case, 20 people could have voted yes and 5 people no and we would have half priced nobles.

Me thinks peoples are jumping the gun...or

I could just be a tard.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Saying 2/3 of the players in a world had to vote yes to pass it wouldn't be fair, especially at this point. A good third of the players on this world are inactive. We had just under a those vote go against the half-price packets as well. Passing it would never have had a chance if it was 2/3 of the players in the world.
 

DeletedUser78416

Guest
Jurasu said:
Saying 2/3 of the players in a world had to vote yes to pass it wouldn't be fair, especially at this point. A good third of the players on this world are inactive. We had just under a those vote go against the half-price packets as well. Passing it would never have had a chance if it was 2/3 of the players in the world.
Click to expand...

But thats exactly what the information stated...'if 2/3rds of the players vote yes'

No where did it say that if 2/3rds of the votes are for yes we would get the nobles.

I call shenanigans.

2/3rds of the players on this world is about 460-475 players. I didn't see anywhere near that number vote yes, thus 2/3rds of the players did NOT in fact vote to incorporate this rule.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I think it was just bad wording. It doesn't specify whether its 2/3 of the players in the world, or just 2/3 of the players who vote.
 

DeletedUser78416

Guest
Jurasu said:
I think it was just bad wording. It doesn't specify whether its 2/3 of the players in the world, or just 2/3 of the players who vote.
Click to expand...

exactly...but they did say players and did not say players that vote.

So, technically the half priced nobles should be a neigh.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
If someone didn't vote, it's as if they don't really care either way (or couldn't make up their mind), and thus they won't be taken into account. :icon_wink: The vote passed with a slim margin, for better or worse.
 

DeletedUser45021

Guest
Move your discussion to the appropriate thread (half priced nobles thread), and stay on topic
 

DeletedUser78416

Guest
Jurasu said:
Not a milestone...
Click to expand...

But a player reaching x amount of points is? :icon_eek:

And a tribe reaching x amount of points for their top 40 is? :icon_surprised:

Seems fitting to me.

The man is #1 in ODA and ODD

Can it be a half-mile stone then? :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top