DeletedUser
Guest
no, no no no. Thats is not what i meant.
Ok i will try to explain this again but hopefully better.
Ok say Lost was beating Sike. (there not)
Lost members see invites from sike and are like WTF we are winning why join them.
Now whats really happening (and what i meant)
Sike is beating lost(they are)
Lost members see invites from Sike and are like. Well we have a chance to live i should take this.
What im saying is if you are beating a tribe in war (like some people think lost is doing to sike, and sike is noob mass recruiters) Why when you are winning join the losing team?
thats what i meant.
But you understand that it's a double entendre right? While yes, it could refer (grammatically) correctly as to LOST members joining SIKE because they don't feel they could win, it also correctly refers to SIKE recruiting LOST members because they don't feel like they can win the actual fight.
There's two available reasonings for the recruitment, discounting the bias flame of "They're recruit whores".
1. SIKE sent the invitations because they didn't feel they'd be able to beat LOST in an actual fight.
2. SIKE sent the invitations because they were afraid of being jumped from another direction if they're forced to fight a long drawn-out war with LOST.
Take your pick, because those are the only two viable options without the third, which as I said at the start, I'm willing to discount as bias in most circumstances.