Top 20 Player opinions

DeletedUser

Guest
who taught you that? the same person who came up with the customer is always right

edit: thanks for top100 though, i started got bored after tribb

First of all, those two analogies are not similar at all. Posting on here, is the same as making a public speech. It's about how you word things, how you present them, you have to make your point simple, clear, informative and decisive. Beating around the bush with lot's of "um..", "oh thats not what I meant...", "i didnt mean that at all, learn to listen *insert petty insults here*", is a clear example of several things,

A) The poster has no real evidence and is trying to word play to prove his point.
B) The poster cannot actually fault the oppositions arguments, or fails to do so, and resorts to insults and such.
C) The poster is too stubborn, or has too much pride, to "back down" when he has lost a debate, and turns from a debate into a catfight.

YOU, have shown every one of these traits. To make it simple, counter these points:

First, SirRonn and KillerYu made up almost the entirety of crispies cap count on FRST. Both of whom, we're known by both sides to be inactive at the start of the war. Do you deny that SirRonn and KillerYu were the majority of crispies cap count, and were both inactive?

Secondly, you accuse FRST on nobling inactives without showing any evidence. Please show, as in the case of crispy, any player who has solely targeted inactives. this means, plus 50/60% of their conquers were on inactive Nuts!.

Thirdly, actually counter the points made. You are making a classic mistake of trying to counter the person, not the points they are making. You have said nothing that convinces anyone, that crispy is anything other than an inactive nobling opportunist. From your posts so far, no-one has changed their minds. In fact, you make the account look even worse with all the chest beating about how great it is, then failing to prove it. You have fallen completely on your face here, please try to prove to me how you have done anything other than embarrass yourself and the account by false praise of what I actually suspect may be your account.

On a side note: Thanks, the top 100 was just meant to be a bit of fun. :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
First of all, those two analogies are not similar at all. Posting on here, is the same as making a public speech. It's about how you word things, how you present them, you have to make your point simple, clear, informative and decisive.


They are directly related but never mind, i assume the rest was directed at duhrigs
 

DeletedUser

Guest
He just posted something that was clearly meant for you and very informative. I learned from it myself, and it would do you well to do the same.

B) The poster cannot actually fault the oppositions arguments, or fails to do so, and resorts to insults and such.
C) The poster is too stubborn, or has too much pride, to "back down" when he has lost a debate, and turns from a debate into a catfight.

If headlights had ever learned these two he might still be here.

Secondly, he posted more than a guide on posting, he made several very clear and concise arguments (the same ones I attempted to make, his words are just prettier :icon_redface: ) , and your only response was an attempt to insult me further.

Please come back at this with something of value that answers Harb's assertions, or not at all.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
He just posted something that was clearly meant for you and very informative. I learned from it myself, and it would do you well to do the same.

B) The poster cannot actually fault the oppositions arguments, or fails to do so, and resorts to insults and such.
C) The poster is too stubborn, or has too much pride, to "back down" when he has lost a debate, and turns from a debate into a catfight.

If headlights had ever learned these two he might still be here.

Secondly, he posted more than a guide on posting, he made several very clear and concise arguments (the same ones I attempted to make, his words are just prettier :icon_redface: ) , and your only response was an attempt to insult me further.

Please come back at this with something of value that answers Harb's assertions, or not at all.

i was in the middle of answering your previous post, then i noticed your edit. im not wasting my time on someone so childish, so gave a response on a level set by you
 

DeletedUser

Guest
oh good, I thought you were making an ass of yourself for a minute there.:icon_eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
oh good, I thought you were making an ass of yourself for a minute there.:icon_eek:

here is stats for Tribb only one of the three you suggested looking at with over 100 caps on nuts

Inactive 89
Active 18

tribbconquers.jpg


Im not giving you a list of our inactives since you seem so keen to target them.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
what about them is confusing you to make you think their not stats?
 

b pasta

Guest
back on topic

Ok, I think this thread has been wildly off topic for some time now? Perhaps this argument gone wrong can continue under the thread

Hot nuts! melt the morning frost

Lets get this bad boy back on topic, as these particular type of threads are usually quite interesting

1. Tribb - Many have complained his war caps are inactive. Going beyond that, some will point to the fact that a large number of his pre-war caps are internals, barbs, tribeless etc. But the reality is, his rate of growth is simply stunning.

And of anyone thats received attacks from him, Iv'e never heard a single quip about him not doing it right. Furthermore, word through the grapevine is that he is a great leader and team player. If I had more experience with him I'm sure this would be alot longer. tribb is "up" 122-5 in war caps

2. dhksththtl - aka Jinn and muffin. They have done a great job with the war. They have grown fast. They have stacked ODA and ODD. Doesn't have the flash of some other players, but is a steady professional account. currently she is "up" 40-11 in war caps

3. Mageknights - My pick for MVP for world 43 so far. Held no. 1 rank for quite some time and is just an ODA Juggernaut. Iv'e had the pleasure of being on the council with him, and can attest that he is a great leader and shrewd strategist. The ruthlessness that he displays make me question whether he is a man, or some kind of malevolent tribal machine sent here to doom spears, swords, and HC to the fiery abyss.

In fact, since meeting mage, I have had deep talks with every spear-weilding citizen iv'e encountered, pleading with them to give up the pole-arms in favor of an axe, or a horse (with no armor mind you) else feel the wrath of Desmond the conquerer.

mage is "up" 56-39

4. Me. TERRIBLE. Heres my annotated sad sob story. Was without cpu first week of dec (power supply went up) on vacation St. Thomas next 2 weeks. While i was gone, crispy "lost" the sit. Got back, planned attack on killer, sent nobles. 2 day break on attack planner, and when break was over i was shocked when all the attacks i had to send were defense. what about my nukes? and realized I had set my nukes to "axe" speed on the attack planner, and none would be able to make it in front of my trains.

LOL. So let killer smash all 60 of my trains. Meanwhile, warpro left and join FRST, he was telling crispy "FRST will let me see claimlist if i take 20 villages, ill spy" I say no, he was obviously trying to play both sides of the fence so i pushed for an op on him.

When i launch, he gets booted. lol again. Susiejean deletes, and barbs open up in and around k25. yay! im mostly k25, been leading the K forever now, and for months the nearest available cap is 200 hours. nobling in k25 feels like coming home after being away forever.

currently im "down" 3-46, unless u count warpro (i dont) id be up 62-46

5. Uncle Fester - Gave a beating, then took a beating. Briefly moved into the number two ranking. Haven't had much contact with him, think he got a couple caps on me when I was away. But iv'e had my eye on him, and his rate of growth is alarming. I wonder is it only one man on the account? Is he really an uncle?

Hasn't done much recently, look for a big move by him soon.

Currently he is still "up" in the stats 100-68.

6. MackennaEmpire - Wow. Flying up the ranks. Late join date (jan 5th) like myself puts him far north. Was the only one other then me who wanted warpros head and wouldnt take no for an answer. (we all miss the ORIGINAL warpro, and the ORIGINAL daalder, and sherve... k23 wouldnt have had to go through all that :( ) He has a rather short temper. He gets slightly irritated just because i nuked him on accident one or two (dozen) times.

Currently "up" 15-1, 62-1 if you count warpro.

7. The Dark Beast - From everything Iv'e heard, a great player. Felt some of his attacks, and those stung. Been as high as rank 4. Decent ODA and great ODD considering how few villages he has lost all time. Hasnt budged in about three weeks. his rebuilding should be done, look for him to collaborate with fester on a big move. soon.

hes current up 77-7

8. Cesar III - 8x attacker of the day. The largest ODA gain in one day among top ten players. Outstanding growth. He is "up" 109-8 with a good portion coming against wortec. Currently nobling BERES.

Dont have much experience with him, but I have a feeling I will before this whole thing is said and done.

9. cristouya1 - Fast becoming a proven warrior. Put quite a hurting on K47-48. Recently has lost a chunk of his(her?) k36 villages. 11th in ODA, 7th in ODD. Hidden awards, though i suspect thats at rank 19th with 5x attacker of the day. Could be wrong. Like that time I asked a german techno CD to the prom. I didn't get laid cause i forgot my walkman.

10. crispycity bum - stats dont lie. 8x attacker of day, 5x greater power, 26x plunder. 180 award points (2nd) 40 million ODA (6th) 2.004 villages per day noble rate (8th). "up" in war caps 133-6. 19th of jan join date.

i remember when he tried to noble his first village in this world he didn't understand why it didn't capture. i had to explain to him that he couldnt send all 4 nobles with one attack :icon_razz:

since then hes dedicated himself to learning every aspect of this game, and around 1 mil picked up a co-player (demaster50 of gore) that has proven to be active and professional and (more importantly) still around.

to address the inactives he has taken: those players (sironn and killeryu) were the closest players to him and the most logical targets. im sure no one thinks he should have nobled 200 hours out just so the players he hit are active.

not only that, those accounts have been sat and maneuvered pretty decently. many of FRST captures against our inactives are on accounts that people just abandoned without even giving a sit. both sides have fed on inactives. its only logical. but its also inevitable that the active and key members will eventually clash. this war has barley begun.

consider this

Side 1:
Players: tribb, Uncle Fester, The Dark Beast, Cesar III, cristouya1
Side 2:
Players: Crispycity bum, b pasta6, mageknights, MackennaEmpire, dhksththtl

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 26
Side 2: 33
Difference: 7






And I leave you with that. No major warring has happened between key players. I'm sorry I couldnt give equal exposure to FRST players. Maybe someone from FRST could do a top ten opinion to shed a little more light on your juggernauts.

ace
 

DeletedUser

Guest
what about them is confusing you to make you think their not stats?

:icon_eek:

If those are stats, then so must be these :icon_idea:

[SPOIL]
monmin.jpg
[/SPOIL]

Putting your humorous failures aside, these are all the people tribb has had caps on from Nuts!:

kingetka
No.35
k-khole
Vinny The King
swamprati
slingo
glimras
Son of Saints
Tritto1981
Balefire
Do i know you?
kokheng
Poltar
Wortec
sarfaraz1

Now lets look at something shall we?

[SPOIL]Side 1:
Players: kingetka
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 53
Difference: 41

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 112,301
Side 2: 511,055
Difference: 398,754

chart


Side 1:
Players: No.35
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 24
Side 2: 3
Difference: 21

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 249,447
Side 2: 29,988
Difference: 219,459

chart


Side 1:
Players: k-khole
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 184
Difference: 184

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 1,820,813
Difference: 1,820,813

chart


Side 1:
Players: Vinny The King
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 8
Difference: 0

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 68,997
Side 2: 68,116
Difference: 881

chart


Side 1:
Players: swamprati
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 10
Side 2: 14
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 109,438
Side 2: 138,257
Difference: 28,819

chart


Side 1:
Players: slingo
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15
Side 2: 28
Difference: 13

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 153,042
Side 2: 271,235
Difference: 118,193

chart


Side 1:
Players: glimras
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 45
Side 2: 8
Difference: 37

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 448,756
Side 2: 67,055
Difference: 381,701

chart


Side 1:
Players: Son of Saints
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 4
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 83,243
Side 2: 38,381
Difference: 44,862

chart


Side 1:
Players: Tritto1981
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 19
Side 2: 15
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 186,135
Side 2: 134,558
Difference: 51,577

chart


Side 1:
Players: Balefire
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 34
Side 2: 95
Difference: 61

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 326,720
Side 2: 893,005
Difference: 566,285

chart


Side 1:
Players: Do i know you?
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 43
Side 2: 28
Difference: 15

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 430,709
Side 2: 274,574
Difference: 156,135

chart


Side 1:
Players: kokheng
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 70
Side 2: 11
Difference: 59

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 677,035
Side 2: 98,563
Difference: 578,472

chart


Side 1:
Players: Poltar
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7
Side 2: 52
Difference: 45

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 74,475
Side 2: 518,092
Difference: 443,617

chart


Side 1:
Players: Wortec
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 401
Difference: 389

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 117,623
Side 2: 3,810,894
Difference: 3,693,271

chart


And sarfaraz1 deleted.[/SPOIL]

Wow look at all the inactives :icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek:

All what, 2 of them? :icon_eek:

In all seriousness, you're pathetic attempts at slandering someone without proof is embarrassing.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
:icon_eek:

If those are stats, then so must be these :icon_idea:

[SPOIL]
monmin.jpg
[/SPOIL]

Putting your humorous failures aside, these are all the people tribb has had caps on from Nuts!:


Ignoring your own guidelines as usual.

You think that stats = something from a website that has stats in the title?

If i take them and put them in a different format that you are used to, they are unrecognizable to you?


kingetka
No.35
k-khole
Vinny The King
swamprati
slingo
glimras
Son of Saints
Tritto1981
Balefire
Do i know you?
kokheng
Poltar
Wortec
sarfaraz1

Now lets look at something shall we?

[SPOIL]Side 1:
Players: kingetka
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 53
Difference: 41

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 112,301
Side 2: 511,055
Difference: 398,754

chart


Side 1:
Players: No.35
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 24
Side 2: 3
Difference: 21

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 249,447
Side 2: 29,988
Difference: 219,459

chart


Side 1:
Players: k-khole
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 184
Difference: 184

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 1,820,813
Difference: 1,820,813

chart


Side 1:
Players: Vinny The King
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 8
Difference: 0

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 68,997
Side 2: 68,116
Difference: 881

chart


Side 1:
Players: swamprati
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 10
Side 2: 14
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 109,438
Side 2: 138,257
Difference: 28,819

chart


Side 1:
Players: slingo
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 15
Side 2: 28
Difference: 13

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 153,042
Side 2: 271,235
Difference: 118,193

chart


Side 1:
Players: glimras
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 45
Side 2: 8
Difference: 37

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 448,756
Side 2: 67,055
Difference: 381,701

chart


Side 1:
Players: Son of Saints
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 8
Side 2: 4
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 83,243
Side 2: 38,381
Difference: 44,862

chart


Side 1:
Players: Tritto1981
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 19
Side 2: 15
Difference: 4

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 186,135
Side 2: 134,558
Difference: 51,577

chart


Side 1:
Players: Balefire
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 34
Side 2: 95
Difference: 61

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 326,720
Side 2: 893,005
Difference: 566,285

chart


Side 1:
Players: Do i know you?
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 43
Side 2: 28
Difference: 15

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 430,709
Side 2: 274,574
Difference: 156,135

chart


Side 1:
Players: kokheng
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 70
Side 2: 11
Difference: 59

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 677,035
Side 2: 98,563
Difference: 578,472

chart


Side 1:
Players: Poltar
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7
Side 2: 52
Difference: 45

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 74,475
Side 2: 518,092
Difference: 443,617

chart


Side 1:
Players: Wortec
Side 2:
Tribes: FRST

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 13:34:33

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 12
Side 2: 401
Difference: 389

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 117,623
Side 2: 3,810,894
Difference: 3,693,271

chart


And sarfaraz1 deleted.[/SPOIL]

Wow look at all the inactives :icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek::icon_eek:

All what, 2 of them? :icon_eek:

You obviously have far lower standards for what an inactive account is. I actually play this game not just the forums.

In all seriousness, you're pathetic attempts at slandering someone without proof is embarrassing.

Who exactly am i slandering i only see you attempting to slander me?, Please tell me where i said taking the enemies inactives is a bad thing.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Stop bitching.... :p

You both got massive holes in your story.

This would be tribb his stats against inactives for as far as I know. (5 caps on wortec or so which are questionable on the counting part. Massive damage was done to it while it was inactive but it got a new owner)

So yes tribb has nobled a lot of inactive Nuts! members.


Side 1:
Players: tribb
Side 2:
Players: k-khole, Wortec, Balefire

Timeframe: 01/12/2010 00:00:00 to 02/02/2011 17:22:11

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 74
Side 2: 0
Difference: 74

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 718,096
Side 2: 0
Difference: 718,096

chart


Now on to my own account.

Yes we have been hitting a lot of inactive FRST. But the moment I hit sirron he wasnt inactive even some impressive stats against Nuts! for the first few days if I remember right. I heard he lost his internet connection, and yes we had a pretty easy ride home on his vills. FRST did have a sit and someone did a good job on sniping like 10 150ms trains at once. But also after he got back we took all isolated vills left inside Nuts! territory.

We send a few trains at greenmantle who happened to be inactive.... The moment we drew the plan he wasnt, when I launched my trains I expected him to be inactive (almost 2 weeks walking I think :p) And well when they hit he most certainly was inactive.

We hit killer not knowing if he was active or not. Figured he wasnt after we took some vills. We attacked his K37 vills which were stacked as we planned.



So we both did a lot of inactive eating on the enemy side. But did either of us do bad? No You need to eat through the enemy line somewhere and by eating some inactives in that area you give your self a job which is so much easier.

And for those who want to flame for the bad trains, killeryu was inactive as said. But some trains died on stacks. These were relaunched with the few troops in the vill. You got a inactive cleared why wouldn't they take it? :p Others were clearing as I cleared quite a few vills on the first timed run but didnt have the nobles to take them all quick so gave a good number away to others.

No real timing was done after the first wave either as it was on someone active.

So done with the fight?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Just in case I hit an inactive by mistake could you please post a list here of nut's inactives. :icon_rolleyes:

I will not attack them honest it is just that I do not want to be seen as a bad sport. :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Ignoring your own guidelines as usual.

You think that stats = something from a website that has stats in the title?

If i take them and put them in a different format that you are used to, they are unrecognizable to you?

:icon_neutral: I couldn't care less about the format, you have just made a pie chart, offering no evidence of where you got any figures or information from, no *sources taken from here *link* etc, you really think people are so gullible as to believe something you say, purely on your own word, with no actual evidence to back it up?

You obviously have far lower standards for what an inactive account is. I actually play this game not just the forums.

I play the game too, and you said "inactive". An inactive account is defined as... Not being active? You didn't say "semi-active" you didn't say "partially active" you didn't say "slightly active" you said "inactive". You're right, we have different standards of measuring inactives. When you start losing, suddenly everything is inactive. :icon_rolleyes:

Who exactly am i slandering i only see you attempting to slander me?, Please tell me where i said taking the enemies inactives is a bad thing.

Please tell me where you said taking the enemies inactives is a good thing? you had a negative overtone for this whole "Tribb sucks" business, or rather "Tribb is as bad as Crispy" I believe was your point. Actually, I believe the initial was "Crispy is such an offensive beast! I <3 his abilities". Well, here are the real stats for Crispy, Minusing FRST's inanctives, this is what he has done for the past 2 months. (I apologize for the poor cropping.)

[SPOIL]

crispystats.jpg


Which totals to (taking out FRST inactives):

Last two months:
59 barbs
13 Non FRST
8 Nuts/Internals/Former Nuts!
2 Losses to Nuts! (Cross Nobling? I'm not sure how that's possible with the noble planner.)
2 Caps on FRST
2 Loss to FRST[/SPOIL]

Simply stunning performance for this supposed offensive beast of Nuts!.

To be honest, I wouldn't actually care about any of this "You're taking inactives" "No, you are!" business, except that in every single war FRST has ever fought, it has always gone on and on and on about it. We have won every war we ever fought, and people STILL go on about us taking inactives. I'm just over arguing over it, it's so old and boring, find a new angle to try and make FRST seem like the noobish amateurs we clearly are.

You claim we are berating Crispy over taking inactives while Tribb does the same thing, but... You are berating Tribb over taking inactives, while Crispy does the same thing. :icon_confused:

I'm just pretty fed up with the only argument that ever comes out against us is "You're just taking inactives". We could list dozens of highly respected players in the tribal wars community, with co-players and 100% activity we took down, and we always worked our way through the memberlist of a tribe from the top down. If anyone remembers, this is what the whole near-war with AAA was about, because they wanted to hit the inactives first and work up the ladder, and we wanted to hit the best and work down. You can't win a war munching on inactives, it might pad the stats, but in reality it doesn't work. We know this better than anyone, and any inactives we do hit are purely strategically valid.

Now that my little rant is over, I agree I have said far too much on this, and should shut up. :icon_razz:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
In all fairness, you cannot count killeryu. He may have been hit by all of Nuts! simultaneously, but the account is active.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I play the game too, and you said "inactive". An inactive account is defined as... Not being active? You didn't say "semi-active" you didn't say "partially active" you didn't say "slightly active" you said "inactive". You're right, we have different standards of measuring inactives. When you start losing, suddenly everything is inactive. :icon_rolleyes:

Yes 10 mins a month is active to you.

Please tell me where you said taking the enemies inactives is a good thing? you had a negative overtone for this whole "Tribb sucks" business, or rather "Tribb is as bad as Crispy" I believe was your point. Actually, I believe the initial was "Crispy is such an offensive beast! I <3 his abilities". Well, here are the real stats for Crispy, Minusing FRST's inanctives, this is what he has done for the past 2 months. (I apologize for the poor cropping.)



I said nowhere that Tribb is a bad player or that taking inactives is a bad thing, because i didn't say that they were good it does not mean i think the opposite. You cannot make things up and then moan if i don't prove accusations i didn't make.

[SPOIL]

crispystats.jpg


Which totals to (taking out FRST inactives):

Last two months:
59 barbs
13 Non FRST
8 Nuts/Internals/Former Nuts!
2 Losses to Nuts! (Cross Nobling? I'm not sure how that's possible with the noble planner.)
2 Caps on FRST
2 Loss to FRST[/SPOIL]


more stats copied and pasted for no particular reason

Simply stunning performance for this supposed offensive beast of Nuts!.

To be honest, I wouldn't actually care about any of this "You're taking inactives" "No, you are!" business, except that in every single war FRST has ever fought, it has always gone on and on and on about it. We have won every war we ever fought, and people STILL go on about us taking inactives. I'm just over arguing over it, it's so old and boring, find a new angle to try and make FRST seem like the noobish amateurs we clearly are.

You claim we are berating Crispy over taking inactives while Tribb does the same thing, but... You are berating Tribb over taking inactives, while Crispy does the same thing. :icon_confused:

Wrong again you are the only one saying that taking inactives is a bad thing


I'm just pretty fed up with the only argument that ever comes out against us is "You're just taking inactives". We could list dozens of highly respected players in the tribal wars community, with co-players and 100% activity we took down, and we always worked our way through the memberlist of a tribe from the top down. If anyone remembers, this is what the whole near-war with AAA was about, because they wanted to hit the inactives first and work up the ladder, and we wanted to hit the best and work down. You can't win a war munching on inactives, it might pad the stats, but in reality it doesn't work. We know this better than anyone, and any inactives we do hit are purely strategically valid.

I agree I have said far too much on this, and should shut up. :icon_razz:

I am bored with your false accusations and then demanding that i prove them.

I agree I have said far too much on this, and should shut up

this part of your post however i do agree with
 

Tribb

Guest
I have no problem admitting I've taken my fair share of inactives and done some internally nobling, my biggest problem is the pure number of sitting of accounts I've had to do this makes it difficult for me to not only play my account full but also to plan operations against very active players who are a good distance from me. I'd love to post some stats from my sit accounts where ive taken on very active players and done extremely well defending as well as nobling. Anyways both sides will no doubt jump on inactives and both sides will have huge gains when they find one, the key is to keep people active and have good sitters for when they arn't active. I've been very impressed by some players from Nuts since the start of the war and extremely impressed with some of our players who have really stepped up. I'm not the best player in this world, I'd go so far as saying im not nearly as skilled as a couple of Nuts players and many player in Frost.
 
Top