DeletedUser
Guest
I challange all Dirty Manics Player to go on world 61 and we re battle there if you have guts
ooo sorry well stay here in world 58.. you can too ooh wait :icon_sad: we took your villages :icon_rolleyes: sorry.. NOT :lol:
I challange all Dirty Manics Player to go on world 61 and we re battle there if you have guts
I challange all Dirty Manics Player to go on world 61 and we re battle there if you have guts
Dont know if MANIC knows this but they failed against lucaya bad.......
This. Hoccamp, you can try to butter the fact that it took MANIC a month to achieve anything against a single-man tribe, when you were the rank 1 tribe and had the assistance of the rank 10 tribe (who actually have displayed much better skills than you yourself have against me :lol. But, at the end of the day:
1. Lucaya account had no outside support.
2. Lucaya account was making a fool out of you and your tribe for the best part of a month. And had done so several months back when still a part of Pacman.
3. Lucaya account managed to snipe the vast majority of the first wave of nobles, when the account was already down to next to no troops due to heavy onslaught prior from AM.
4. You are trying to brag about you as 2 top 10 tribes beating an account that wasn't even top 20 when you declared on it ingame. Nobody would expect you to, because failing for the first 3 weeks is simply no achievement.
You can claim Lucaya account is poor all you like. But, that "poor" quality has shown that MANIC is unable to pick a fight on anybody unless the odds are heavily slanted in their favour, by any means necessary. In this case, a single account with no tribe or support :lol:
Lucaya account is going down and we really don't care. We've had our fun, we've made a mockery of your tribe. And had fun all the while whilst you get all high and mighty and continually try to tell us to shut up on the forum for laughing at your incompetencies :icon_razz:
Lucaya account is going down and we really don't care. We've had our fun, we've made a mockery of your tribe. And had fun all the while whilst you get all high and mighty and continually try to tell us to shut up on the forum for laughing at your incompetencies :icon_razz:
You can also butter the fact that it's never been more than what, 8 players attacking you? I know you already said, but I've forgotten, as it doesn't really concern me or Beyond.
1. It did. You can only get so far from sniping and recapping. You cannot win a fight without outside support when you are a 1-man tribe. Now, unless you play the account yourself, you wouldn't be able to see the full scale of the conflict. So, you will have to accept my view on this as yours will have no basis of fact.1. It didn't need outside support to keep villages.
2. How? By being a good co-played account then a solo account? That's nothing to be embarrassed about, for either side.
3. Good job, you did well keeping that many for so long.
4. Going back to the point above, it wasn't the tribe of MANIC that was attacking you wholly, merely a few players. 8 players =/= all of MANIC.
I could have done so, yes. But, I chose not to. For the reasons explained above. To have the ability to point out that MANIC has taken a month to start eliminating a tribe with no support. To drive the point I was making home, and to also make it more fun and a lot harder for me. Likewise did WAE :lol:You had the option of joining a tribe and receiving support, you chose not to and defend your account solo. Saying that there was no outside support is a moot point because you chose not to have any.
8 players from one tribe.
20 from another.
That's still 28 accounts versus 1. Still nothing to be proud of for the attackers :icon_razz:
1. It did. You can only get so far from sniping and recapping. You cannot win a fight without outside support when you are a 1-man tribe. Now, unless you play the account yourself, you wouldn't be able to see the full scale of the conflict. So, you will have to accept my view on this as yours will have no basis of fact.
2. No. By being able to fight for such a long period of time before anybody was able to do what should have been able to have been done when they declared :icon_wink:
3. Thanks :icon_razz:
4. A tribe working together on a target doesn't have to include the full tribe. I rarely ever do this on worlds I play when I'm leading. I generally have groups of several players focus on different targets at once. It's a tactic - it doesn't mean it isn't a tribe attacking.
I would agree that if only 2-3 MANIC members had been involved, I wouldn't class it as MANIC. However, when it is a reasonable number, of which I class as more than 5 accounts (and over 10 MANIC members were involved in attacking and/or faking), it can be assumed that they are targeting the account as a tribe. Not a full tribe, but still as a tribe. And with the AM members by their side :icon_redface:
I could have done so, yes. But, I chose not to. For the reasons explained above. To have the ability to point out that MANIC has taken a month to start eliminating a tribe with no support. To drive the point I was making home, and to also make it more fun and a lot harder for me. Likewise did WAE :lol:
So, whilst you say it is a moot point. It is a perfectly valid fact. Fact is, you can try to cover up for it all you like for your allies, but they are the ones who took a month to break an account with under 40 D villages, with another top tribe helping them out :icon_redface:
8 members of MANIC + 20 from AM.Your post was mainly about embarrassing MANIC. 8 players from MANIC attacking you and you holding off isn't necessarily a bad thing for either side. That is my point regarding this.
I kept a lot through sniping for a while. But the loyalty was low and so when more nobles came, I couldn't do much. Recaps - I forgot to dodge a few nukes, and so recaps were harder.1. So you're saying that you kept no villages through sniping and re-capping? I'd have to say that's not true.
2. My point here is that they didn't do a tribal op on you, it was loose players attacking (from MANIC). If they wanted to do a tribal op, I'm sure you wouldn't have been able to stay on nearly as long (not because you're not a good player, but because they'd have more troops being sent). It's -much- easier to defend against 8 players than 40. Or if you want to add AM, 28 than 60.
That's what happens when a tribe isn't focusing solely on one account. Players take more time to be nobled out.
Why the big debate every time NoF is added to stats?
End of the day, he was in FORK when the op started, so he should be added to stats. Sure there's numerous stories floating around of "Manic did this" "Manic did that" and only a few people will know what truly happened, but this whole thing is getting pretty old now.
This is speaking as a FORK member.
coming from FORK's own mouth ladies and gent's, so i think it's time you layed it to rest googly as you can see OUR enemies think the same. nobody here to blame but NoF, if what he say's is true not only is he incoherent of the rules but also admitted he broke them.. therefore your point is moot either way.
and before the mod attempts to remove this post for my statement above, im not talking about it, im just explaining a theortical scenario.
@Googly
also on another note, we never solely came after you as a tribe, as KK stated you had better results agaisnt AM then you did MANIC persay but trying to embarrass MANIC was only embarrassing yourself if you truly look at teh stat's and no matter how you wanna butter it up, you was beaten irregardless by your OWN arrogant choices. so trying to make something of it is not really gonna happen because you had the option to join another tribe, i mean shit i dont see why you didnt join FORK 'or atleast attempt to gift them the villages' where they could be closier to MANIC, but eh i aint complaining.
end of teh day YOU LOST. i'm glad your having as much fun as i am watching you being rimmed
@ KK dont bother yourself with this guy. he would argue with a wall if he could. :icon_eek:
he lives in a fantasy world KK where he thinks his shit dont stink lol. i wont bother replying as i know your a waste of time and effort.
The reason why we did not join a tribe or join fork, because to prove you guys that the account is not used for spying manic to fork. The other reason is to have fun. Like what happened. :icon_evil: We killed alot of nobles there, The account won't go anywhere there. Its just that You failed to finish the account within a week. Knowing that it is on your territory and no support from any other players.
The reason why we did not join a tribe or join fork, because to prove you guys that the account is not used for spying manic to fork. The other reason is to have fun. Like what happened. :icon_evil: We killed alot of nobles there, The account won't go anywhere there. Its just that You failed to finish the account within a week. Knowing that it is on your territory and no support from any other players.
The reason why we did not join a tribe or join fork, because to prove you guys that the account is not used for spying manic to fork. The other reason is to have fun. Like what happened. :icon_evil: We killed alot of nobles there, The account won't go anywhere there. Its just that You failed to finish the account within a week. Knowing that it is on your territory and no support from any other players.
Just for you Rawr, a list of Manic's allies
Starting at the top of course.
Insan3<-yes
Honor <-hell no
Beyond<-yes
T-Crew<-yes
AM <-yes
MUNPIA<-hell no, was a joke tribe cause LOTN was in it and we wanted to keep oru wolves off it.
K.S.D<-nap
BERRY<-nap
Just for you Rawr, a list of Manic's allies
Starting at the top of course.
Insan3
Honor
Beyond
T-Crew
AM
MUNPIA
K.S.D
BERRY
I thought you said you didn't kick Lucaya because you thought he was a spy? You can't even keep your own story straight, must be hard work convincing yourself of all the lies, eh Rawr
You said he wasn't kicked for being a spy.