Michael Corleone.
Guest
Well raavna for someone whose spent as much time as you analyzing w90 and such, you still don't know much or anything really.
Well raavna for someone whose spent as much time as you analyzing w90 and such, you still don't know much or anything really.
Side 1:
Tribes: TEA
Side 2:
Tribes: Infamy
Timeframe: 14/02/2017 02:30:30 to 16/02/2017 13:53:41
Total conquers:
Side 1: 245
Side 2: 203
Difference: 42
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 3
Side 2: 3
Difference: 0
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 1,629,068
Side 2: 1,385,896
Difference: 243,172
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 19,852
Side 2: 28,630
Difference: 8,778
After War Declaration these stats are not really supporting any OPS going on except some talks in between both tribe members are happening (what bird whispered)
Mostly when one tribe declare war on another we saw Huge OPS just after or before the declaration, if it is already under way update us the status, we can wait till the nukes lands on remote far villages.
BIP i think from here you need to be more cautious as any day we can see AM formed, These are the almost same bunch who was behind AM in w83. Possibly this war declaration is part of diplomacy to segregate the members to recruit, Co-play or Nobled out.
Poor guy probably doesn't think before he speaksWell raavna for someone whose spent as much time as you analyzing w90 and such, you still don't know much or anything really.
You're missing the fact that the TEA coalition contains two tribes other than TEA. Here are war stats if you look at Infamy vs. TEA, WAR, and P-W:
Side 1:
Tribes: Infamy
Side 2:
Tribes: TEA, P-W, W A R
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 772
Side 2: 1,215
Difference: 443
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 30
Side 2: 7
Difference: 23
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 5,881,645
Side 2: 6,020,598
Difference: 138,953
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 215,339
Side 2: 52,959
Difference: 162,380
Fair call. And for the sake of completeness, here are the stats between tribes in the top 10 with which TEA has exchanged more than 20 conquests in the past month, plus newcomer Infamy:
Side 1:
Tribes: BiP, -DC-, FARM, Q-EST, Kraken, Infamy
Side 2:
Tribes: TEA, P-W, W A R
Timeframe: Last week
Total conquers:
Side 1: 1,610
Side 2: 1,214
Difference: 396
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 157
Side 2: 249
Difference: 92
Points value of total conquers:
Side 1: 9,193,881
Side 2: 6,023,629
Difference: 3,170,252
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 1,201,769
Side 2: 1,787,166
Difference: 585,397
You counted Q-EST as being on the opposing side of your coalition. Not only do we have no diplomatic relations with them, DC, or Kraken; Q-EST is WAR's academy tribe, it says so right in the profile of both tribes. You're counting your ally's academy tribe, who has probably been supporting your tribe as well, as an enemy.
Either way you've included an academy of WAR on the side of your enemy? I scratch my head sometimes.
WAR, PW and Tea - All have diplomatic ties and at war with Infamy
Infamy and BiP - Have diplomatic ties
Kraken, Qest and DC - No ties with Infamy.
Farm - Can be included with Infamy though. the recruitment should now replace that since the war broke out? But previously no diplomatic ties.
Hope that spells it out nice and simple
Either way you've included an academy of WAR on the side of your enemy? I scratch my head sometimes.
Glad to see it did not take long for us to go full dumbass with the stats already.
True, but I'm also free to point that fact out in this thread. And yes, choosing silence is probably much wiser than getting all touchy and throwing insults over it