Oh Digg, why you so mean.

  • Thread starter DeletedUser116214
  • Start date

Deleted User - 10618707

Guest
Someone's mad they can't get looter of the day anymore :p?
 

DeletedUser116214

Guest
Ghostoxa said:
First time you guys get threaten or receive hate mails/messages?

Grow some balls, stop crying about this nonsense and move on, it's not such a big deal.
Click to expand...

Relax macho man, no one talking about crying, growing balls or anyone being offended. Its a discussion, you don't like it, don't read it.
Not like an ignorant imbecile in the online world who photoshopped us with an ISIS picture or threatened to rape my mom, will change anything in my life. After all, he specified his profession in life on skype, and no big surprise there to why he's such a failure.
Point to be made was the caliber of ethics some of Digg players have. Spying and this blablabla everyone cries about is something, its part of a war game but going that far is something else.
 

Ghostoxa

Guest
Phoenician said:
Relax macho man, no one talking about crying, growing balls or anyone being offended. Its a discussion, you don't like it, don't read it.
Not like an ignorant imbecile in the online world who photoshopped us with an ISIS picture or threatened to rape my mom, will change anything in my life. After all, he specified his profession in life on skype, and no big surprise there to why he's such a failure.
Point to be made was the caliber of ethics some of Digg players have. Spying and this blablabla everyone cries about is something, its part of a war game but going that far is something else.
Click to expand...

Discussion? where? please show me because all I see is you and matt whining over some pictures that an idiot has made.
 

DeletedUser111574

Guest
Wow, Digg has some freaks in their tribe. Seriously this is a game, why write shit like that? Weirdos
 

DeletedUser116214

Guest
Ghostoxa said:
Discussion? where? please show me because all I see is you and matt whining over some pictures that an idiot has made.
Click to expand...
Apparently, 5 pages of comments from different players in different tribes makes it a discussion, unless you have another definition for it, be my guest.
But once more, no one holding a gun to your head. You don't like it, don't read it.
Its always funny once in a while, someone like you pops out of nowhere just to highlight the so called crying they think others are doing.

"I post, therefor I exist" Must be your moto.
 

Garrock

Guest
While I don't particularly agree with Ghostoxa in this instance, I have more thought that those who spam these forums with trash talk, and nonsensical garbage are more the garden variety "I post therefore I exist" types. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

Guest
Ethics discussions from members of Paryl, with the likes of Matt and Karina in it... Priceless.
 

universal thought

Guest
Lord Haseo said:
Ethics discussions from members of Paryl, with the likes of Matt and Karina in it... Priceless.
Click to expand...
you do know that the reason I probably won't be coming back for w100 is because you or one of your members got into deadly's account and impersonated him right? glad I called that guy the c word
 

hurod

Guest
giphy.gif
 

universal thought

Guest
i could go on, but I don't think you'd like what I have to say
 

DeletedUser116214

Guest
Garrock said:
While I don't particularly agree with Ghostoxa in this instance, I have more thought that those who spam these forums with trash talk, and nonsensical garbage are more the garden variety "I post therefore I exist" types. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You lost me there for a second o_O
 

DeletedUser121043

Guest
Lord Haseo said:
You are specifically stating "You" which I had nothing to do with it, clearly, as I asked who did it.

And yes I did say that. Yes that may have been the only actual term but still supporting an enemy tribe at war with us as a NAP is a breach, as it is an act of aggression as sitting their accounts also is. Either way doesn't matter how it came about because it was bound to happen eventually.
Click to expand...
Your logic is flawed there. If supporting against a Nap'ed tribe was a breach of the agreement by default the Napping part would also have to NAP each other's allies, as any tribe would be forced to help support their allied tribes, as a part of such an agreement. From there the issue continues, as those new NAP's allies would also have to be NAP'ed and so on.
The truth is we honored our deal, and you did not.
 

Deleted User - 10618707

Guest
Are allies forced to support allied tribes? Talk about flawed logic.
 

DeletedUser121043

Guest
ITz.TD said:
Are allies forced to support allied tribes? Talk about flawed logic.
Click to expand...
That depends on what the terms of an alliance is, but if you won't support you might just as well NAP instead. If you just want to OP with someone and prevent backstabbing it is better to just NAP, and coordinate the OP together instead. Unless it is with Diggs, because they will backstab you anyway.
 
I-AM-GROOT

I-AM-GROOT

Still Going Strong
Reaction score
663
Garrock said:
While I don't particularly agree with Ghostoxa in this instance, I have more thought that those who spam these forums with trash talk, and nonsensical garbage are more the garden variety "I post therefore I exist" types. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Like making a post regarding racial slurs when the player says them himself ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top