DeletedUser122367
Guest
The point is, in general the game would be more funny if all of us play with 1 single tribe. I go deeper, the game would be more funny if all of us play with 1 single tribe and without diplomatics.
But, all of us know that it is imposible so we have to respect that friends want to play together in more than 1 tribe. There are many things that detract the game: Betrayals, extortion, pacts for premium points...
For me it would be great to eliminate all of those things, but its imposible.
But, there is a problem with macro-tribes. If the world is small and you have a lot of players you may detract the game experience. I will exagerate but imagine a world that since the start a family have the 50% of domain... That would make no-sense.
Im not saying that the italian team its abusing the macro-tribe strategy, i didn´t chek the numbers.
(sorry if my english its garbage)
But, all of us know that it is imposible so we have to respect that friends want to play together in more than 1 tribe. There are many things that detract the game: Betrayals, extortion, pacts for premium points...
For me it would be great to eliminate all of those things, but its imposible.
But, there is a problem with macro-tribes. If the world is small and you have a lot of players you may detract the game experience. I will exagerate but imagine a world that since the start a family have the 50% of domain... That would make no-sense.
Im not saying that the italian team its abusing the macro-tribe strategy, i didn´t chek the numbers.
(sorry if my english its garbage)