See, that's the thing with externals. Politics and propaganda is all about. This is why many players don't read or write anything in this place.
If they really wanted to know what was going on, they would go to the source (which isn't too hard to reach) of the action. They would do as Sybrand said, and actually speak with Tina to figure out why things were done. I find it rather funny, stupid, as well as childish if people are gullible enough to believe everything people write. I hope most of you realize that when people say why Tina has done the things that she has done, they have little to no information regarding the tribe's circumstances in terms of diplomatic relations and wars. Therefore their assessments can only be so accurate.
What's worse is that the things they are saying shows some pretty childish logic. I won't point you out, because I am not trying to put you down. I am only trying to let the readers know that buying what you say is dumb. Let me explain with an example of the process of thought of children in elementary school.
Person B says:
"Person C looks so lonely. Maybe I should befriend him. What do you think, Person A?"
Person A says:
"I remember Person C. I heard he got detention for stealing his friend's lunch."
Person B says:
"Oh, is that so? Hmm, okay. I guess its not a good decision to be Person C's friend?"
Person A says:
"You are right. He stole from his friend once, and therefore he will steal EVERY SINGLE ONE of his friends' lunches, whenever the opportunity arises. This will happen for sure because he's done it once, regardless of anything and everything."
Just because Tina and her fellow leadership did what they did on W31, it does not mean that they will do it again on W47. To expect the same thing to happen again is just, again, childish. If you put any thought into this, you would realize what I mean. Just read the example above to see the process of thought of a child. They jump to conclusions. They have little information that may not even be true. With this information that is assumed to be 100% true, they somehow infer and jump to a conclusion.