I'm not sure I claimed to be good... but either way there's a simple explanation, it's called not trying.
That's a convenient excuse, but trying or not trying, your nothing exceptional, and are most likely sub-par. So far when I've questioned both yours and Sell's skills, yiou've both said "You can beat me I quit/didn't try". Words spoken of sore losers with little class. I give props when due, but you've done nothing to deserve any. I've reneged on what I said about Sell running from attacks as the time frame seemed different in my mind, but we still served his account. That better?
It's through what you implied by using your "fact" in reasoning of analysis. Something I was very able to refute.
Where? You keep saying you've refuted things, but never give any evidence, I rebutt to your points, and they get more and more vague and unspecific. :icon_redface: Just saying you refuted my points doesn't mean you did. Show me where, and show which points specifically.
I asked you directly, what have you done that's noteworthy and all you've done is try and bait a reaction out of me and try to aggravate and frustrate me(see your next post after this) and ignore my posts, while claiming that I'm the one who's doing so. I've said your not successful, and I've gone as far as to say your a joke for thinking for, so, if you've had successes, other your "camaraderie", what are they?
bloodhood said:
Awwww someones getting mad
Is the big bad baddest MF alive getting upset :icon_cry:
Next time you say I'm immature or anything about the way I post, refer back to this, BH, because this is garbage pnp. :icon_redface:
bloodhood said:
I was responding to your arguments, effectively too I might add, until I noticed you didn't respond to those arguments
Example, please? I have a hard time believing that you truly think I haven't responded to your posts and this is a sorry attempt at turning the argument to something you think you can win, but you logic is flawed here too. There is nowhere when I failed to address to the main point of a post, and if you show me one, I will renege on this and attempt to answer more clearly, but you were flaming me for redundancy, so it would be ironic to ask me to repeat/rehash myself.
bloodhood said:
just focused on things such as "your a bad player", "you suck as a leader" meh mehe meh meh. I didn't even talk about any of that, or ever make any sort of counter claim
bloodhood said:
My ingame is hardly poor, it doesn't take much to be good, just activity and knowledge.
See what I just did there? I used your own post against you. I don't really need to prove you wrong, you do a good job of that yourself. :icon_redface:
bloodhood said:
yet you continue to argue over something I've never argued about. How do you honestly expect me to not deflect over that? Should it even be called deflection? Surely it is deflection in your part in trying to argue a point that I've never made.
You have stated in the past that you're an excellent leader and diplomat. Not gonna search back and find quotes, but its there. :icon_confused:
bloodhood said:
Unless that is your whole argument is based on an ad hominem based attack on myself, something I have no bother in arguing over and is a pretty fundamental flaw.
Are you aware of transference? Because most of the things you've said to me have much more bearing to yourself. SS might be right about me being an asshole, but just because my point is about you doesn't make it hominem, and saying it is is a gross misinterpretation of it's meaning. My point about you/ZOMBIE involves a majority of your characteristics, so critisizing you isn't deflecting, but I'm not here to argue semantics, and I don't want to because I'm sure we could go back and forth forever.
So, let me lament my point for you, as you seem to being getting very confused: You have had no success on this world. And I've asked, several times, if you disagree with this, what are your successes?
