PHAT vs SWAT

DeletedUser

Guest
I honestly want SWAT to put up a good fight. It looks pretty decent up until now.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Objective stats, YAAAAAAY!!!! :p

Since y'all can't seem to agree on how to display the stats, let's do it both ways:
With Cakebar:
[spoil]
Forever:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 273
Side 2: 179
Difference: 94

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,502,778
Side 2: 1,576,682
Difference: 926,096

chart
[/spoil]

Last Week:
[spoil]

Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 79
Side 2: 109
Difference: 30

chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 739,843
Side 2: 993,062
Difference: 253,219

chart
[/spoil]

Last 48H
[spoil]

Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 27
Side 2: 33
Difference: 6

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 251,317
Side 2: 298,360
Difference: 47,043

chart
[/spoil][/spoil]

Without Cakebar:
[spoil]
Forever:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 262
Side 2: 113
Difference: 149

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,401,129
Side 2: 988,836
Difference: 1,412,293

chart



[/spoil]
Last Week:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 77
Side 2: 43
Difference: 34

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 721,828
Side 2: 405,216
Difference: 316,612

chart



[/spoil]
Last 48H:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 27
Side 2: 16
Difference: 11

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 251,317
Side 2: 149,181
Difference: 102,136

chart



[/spoil]
[/spoil]
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Since y'all can't seem to agree on how to display the stats, let's do it both ways:
With Cakebar:
[spoil]
Forever:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 273
Side 2: 179
Difference: 94

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,502,778
Side 2: 1,576,682
Difference: 926,096

chart
[/spoil]

Last Week:
[spoil]

Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 79
Side 2: 109
Difference: 30

chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 739,843
Side 2: 993,062
Difference: 253,219

chart
[/spoil]

Last 48H
[spoil]

Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 27
Side 2: 33
Difference: 6

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 251,317
Side 2: 298,360
Difference: 47,043

chart
[/spoil][/spoil]

Without Cakebar:
[spoil]
Forever:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 262
Side 2: 113
Difference: 149

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2,401,129
Side 2: 988,836
Difference: 1,412,293

chart



[/spoil]
Last Week:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 77
Side 2: 43
Difference: 34

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 721,828
Side 2: 405,216
Difference: 316,612

chart



[/spoil]
Last 48H:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 27
Side 2: 16
Difference: 11

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 251,317
Side 2: 149,181
Difference: 102,136

chart



[/spoil]
[/spoil]

I really do not see how they should not be added its frankly ludicrous for anyone to even insinuate they should not be added he was in phat we attacked him they kicked him therefor those stats will be added.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I'm not disagreeing at all Randy; however it does make for an interesting side by side comparison.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
well we (I think I can speak for all of phat when saying this), do not care about cakebar beeing added or not...
Yes, we should have dismissed him before the war started.... The account was not beeing played as active as it should when the war started..
However, we didn't dismiss them, and when the war started... Cakebar was included in this, and therefor I won't blame anyone for adding him to the stats.
If -SWAT- were to dismiss one of the members with similiar reasons, most of us in phat would put that specific player in our stats to..


Just stop the discussion, add him to the stats.. :S don't make a problem out of things that don't really matter..
-Swat- is putting up a decent fight, Phat is still on the winning hand..

The outcome of the war is not certain yet..

end!
 

DeletedUser80229

Guest
Your exactly right, the war is being fought on multiple fronts obviously. but each one of those fronts are doing better then the other. As East front -SWAT- is doing well, as WEST front PHAT is doing well. It is a good war in my eyes i'm having loads of fun capping PHAT ;]

Goodluck to all, i hope everyone is having fun.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Some fresh stats for the masses.

Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Players: Cakebar
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers:

Side 1: 78
Side 2: 134
Difference: 56

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 18
Side 2: 34
Difference: 16

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 707,424
Side 2: 1,132,135
Difference: 424,711

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 169,418
Side 2: 315,631
Difference: 146,213

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Just to show how important Cakebar is:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops, C.I.A.

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 21
Side 2: 19
Difference: 2

chart

[/spoil]
 

DeletedUser

Guest
again with cia? -SWAT- and cops fair enough, we are FAmILy. cia are not.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Just to show how important Cakebar is:
[spoil]
Side 1:
Tribes: Phat
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, Cops, C.I.A.

Timeframe: Last 48 hours

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 21
Side 2: 19
Difference: 2

chart

[/spoil]

You dont seem to get it why would he not be important he was a target we took him out stop making excuses and tryin to put down the stats at the end of the day those villages were your tribes now are mine isnt that the whole point of the war to gain ground from your enemies ?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What she means is Cakebar isn't that important in the grand scheme of things. Stats seem to be close, with or without Cakebar.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
What she means is Cakebar isn't that important in the grand scheme of things. Stats seem to be close, with or without Cakebar.

Well looking at the map says different they lost a big chunk of one of there most dominant k's which is not a good sign.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You dont seem to get it why would he not be important he was a target we took him out stop making excuses and tryin to put down the stats at the end of the day those villages were your tribes now are mine isnt that the whole point of the war to gain ground from your enemies ?

Just to show how important you think you are :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well looking at the map says different they lost a big chunk of one of there most dominant k's which is not a good sign.

Doesn't make any difference really. The account had done nothing for a very long time before and was hardly likely to help much in the war. All you have done is waste nukes and nobles on it that could have been focused on people who will attack back.

Really inactive players show nothing, its fair to include them in the stats but they don't make a scrap of difference. The only time they show something at all is when someone goes inactive as soon as they are attacked and that just shows the player is not very good.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well there is a difference but its one too be expected. If 5million point player gets attacks as heavily as a 2.5million player its obvious that the 5million player will lose less as he has much more defensive troops to move around and get to where they need to be.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Well there is a difference but its one too be expected. If 5million point player gets attacks as heavily as a 2.5million player its obvious that the 5million player will lose less as he has much more defensive troops to move around and get to where they need to be.

The difference she tries to point out seems to be Duncan is inactive.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
LOL really no i think the case is more the new owner has quit due to the attacks big big difference there.

Please don't involve me in others inability to read. I was merely pointing out what Chelsea is - or so I think - trying to imply. You bro-though talk is directed at the wrong person.
 
Top