DeletedUser
Guest
Now we get to have a SECOND party later!
Here is some top-secret unseen footage of Regime's afterparty!
Now we get to have a SECOND party later!
Here is some top-secret unseen footage of Regime's afterparty!
Did Nwaro and Lovers join the fight?
Thats a bit misleading though. If you were to remove a lot of the players from Ben then the stats would be much more even so I think you are making it biased
Nickname checks out.No that doesn't make sense. Some folks in Ben have lost a lot of villages so it make it seem like the whole tribe is doing worse. So by not taking them out you are making it more biased and misleading
No that doesn't make sense. Some folks in Ben have lost a lot of villages so it make it seem like the whole tribe is doing worse. So by not taking them out you are making it more biased and misleading
What if the folks losing vills are still nice people to have there to talk to though? I don't see why you would try and skew the stats simply for that reason. How about just showing the actual active fellas and giving everyone a true picture of whats going on.Any tribe must accept the stats as a whole despite any player leaking villages. If Ben aren't happy with "some folks in Ben losing lots of villages" which in turn will affect their stats, then kick them and eat them.
Close to every Dest account has been owner less at some point in time, with the exception of maybe 5 accounts (Or had players that stopped logging for a while, and therefore remained inactive). If a large majority of dest players had positive war stats and were being dragged down by a small number of players with huge losses, then this would be a valid argument, but this simply isn't the case.All he is saying, is that the numbers are artificially inflated because multiple accounts are most likely owner-less, thus boosting Regime's stats.