Deleted User - 10618707
Guest
Oooh spicy comments. Interested to see how Burn does under the meti dynasty. '
Abyss comments are a pain to read. So whiny
Abyss comments are a pain to read. So whiny
Oooh spicy comments. Interested to see how Burn does under the meti dynasty. '
Abyss comments are a pain to read. So whiny
About 96, yes my account probably did play on the fence longer than it should have and afterward, I apologized for it to you Trex, Jake and Spyke.
I said I would launch on the barbs you took within the 5x5 of my connected cluster, not on your acc. Your answer was "But how will your acc do if I launch 400 nukes at it then?"None of us ever planned to join Wus. We have about half of the tribe conquers vs Wus. If we wanted to join we could of just refused to fight and played on the rim like you. You told me you would launch on me if I nobled past a point. I told you good luck and if u did I would launch on you. You never launched? You disappeared instead while we got hundreds of conquers from wus.
I said I would launch on the barbs you took within the 5x5 of my connected cluster, not on your acc. Your answer was "But how will your acc do if I launch 400 nukes at it then?"
Ofc. That is what any sensible person would do. Atleast people in Burn are kind enough to still have you around in the world. Cus boy if you were near me and even nobled 1 tiny barb within 20 x 20 of my cluster then id have ripped your arse off your coccyx and placed it on your hands lol.
Unlike you, not everyone has the luxury of PP to waste buying packages for nobles.
Do you know what investment is?Yet you bragged about dropping 30k pp on a single event, multiple times.
Yet you bragged about dropping 30k pp on a single event, multiple times.
I do and stacking against your NAP to lose the world is a lousy investment of time and troops
Damn that sucks my 5def cost burn the world win. Maybe if it was 150 def it would of deleted everyone.
lol, the fact you either thought visine wouldnt notice or wouldnt care is still mind boggling to me.
10 dvs actually because you made your subordinate send as well.
Well I wasn't speaking for Burn, Trex had been pestering Visine leadership to invite you down the world which you blew by doing that.
I mean you also screwed burn by causing an absolute split in the tribe by making half the tribe think you're a jackass for going super offensive, asking the tribe to stack you while you stack against your NAP. It's quite an achievement Burn leadership managed to keep diplo and refuse the dismissal request from Jon. I bet you never apologised for your stupidity or thanked them for their efforts.
So now you admit the defense was meant to sabotage relations and start a war between Visine and Burn, completely disrespecting any leadership in place?
Also if you look under diplomacy Visine should be listed as a NAP, someone in Burn should be able to verify it's there, so they are marked as a NAP on the map as well.
I'm sure that is the only account that dislikes you
Are you on the superdog account?
Just reminds me of something you possibly did on w96. Theres no reason to hide really.
Half of it was there a month prior and the other half a week or so before attacks. It was a day or 2 before we hit wus. Was 5def more important then a 1v3? It was a nap not some end game alliance with roster spots. I didnt even see any terms to the NAP except a k53 border. If I ended up leaving or getting kicked or burn fought visine with fullish strength wus before 20mil ODA/400ish conquers vs them I dont see how that would put burn in a worse position to win. This comment alone imo shows where burn failed in diplo.