1337 vs. Sci

[DeletedUser]

of coarse you are going to be able to survive all the incomings if you stacked. perhaps if you take down one of the decent sci players.........

ROFL....:icon_biggrin:

if its so funny why havnt the leet done it yet?

ive educated and sent all the nobles i have at tse, im waiting for resources :lol:

 

[DeletedUser]

well, i say tse, another one of the ex r2 noobs

Yeah, well, do you always need 3 posts to make yourself "clear"?
Or do you just don't know what edit means?
Hint: In your case, i'd go for the delete button.

 

[DeletedUser]

just wanting to up my post per day rating to beat daz....NOT:icon_eek:

 

[DeletedUser]

well, i say tse, another one of the ex r2 noobs

You mean inactives. I've fought you there and as soon as I started taking your villages and recapping what you took, you gave up and targeted inactives again. I target them cuz everyone else is stacked, you do because you lack skill to battle a decent player.

 

[DeletedUser]

when the hell have i attacked or you attacked me!!!! im sorry daz but this i cannot remember. unless you refer to nayazu taking a whopping 4 villages from me i have no clue what you are on about. all villages lost have either been through exchange, sniping or recent conquests ive been unable to support due to distance, me sleeping or me being afk. other than you sitting this account i have no clue what you are on about.

infact it can only be this lol, hardly a decisive victory daz taking newly acquired villages in an area that at the time was surrounded by R2 with incomings from nayazu and the late Tomwaits. if this was you it was an appalling effort, i had about 15 villages in the cluster and you both managed to take just 4 with the numerous attacks. your more arrogant than i could ever imagine.

 

[DeletedUser]

infact it can only be this lol, hardly a decisive victory daz taking newly acquired villages in an area that at the time was surrounded by R2 with incomings from nayazu and the late Tomwaits.

I was just killing off bad troop builds at the owners request for the week I was there. I targeted 4 PKs players.. just happened that you gave up villages while none of the others did cept for one that recapped his. Didn't you try that and fail?

 

[DeletedUser]

i was being sat i am afraid for that, i was there for most of the defence and there when i lost them but i wasn't there for the recaptures and came back at the wrong time to retake, but there was nothing i could do anyway, i didnt ask for support because it was at the time in the middle of your former tribe and i couldnt stack them enough or get troops there intime to hold it. plus the main cluster of nayazu was next-door daz, surely you must remember that, my feeble 15 villages couldnt hope to retake against that much support. and if it was a random use of troops, how come i had a tonne from tomwaits just before you used the nayazu account?

i dont think even you could have pulled that off, 15 villages against the best part of 200? give me a break daz.

 

[DeletedUser]

and of coarse i went back to inactives, i had the best part of 300 villages of ismailed to take before you or sciros did, i couldnt just leave the best chance to get a firm hold of k85. i think my actions at this time have been justified.

 

[DeletedUser]

i dont think even you could have pulled that off, 15 villages against the best part of 200? give me a break daz.

I was attacking 3 others so it was 10:3 odds, sounds scary.. I hope I never have to fight those odds :icon_eek: I never heard from tom when I mailed, nor had he been active on W5 since december.

 

[DeletedUser]

yeah it should my bad . Daz how about you or fizz put up, or shut up. all talk.

now i'm not one to stick up for Daz or Fizz on these forums but you are a hypocrite no?

For some reason i have two of daz's mighty 300 outgoings :icon_eek: i dont know how im going to manage.

regardless, everyone quit your bitching. and stay on topic. stats please daz for the second time of askingz. it will save the thread.

when the hell have i attacked or you attacked me!!!

As for the 3 million more od, i cant help the fact that the only incomings ive had in months are the two Daz has sent

 

[DeletedUser]

bicky hardly necessary, daz knew what i meant as did the rest other than you, but im not surprised.
so it was just coincidence the two accounts attacked at the same time? shesh i must have been mighty unlucky:lol:

anyway im not bothered, im still here and PKs has control of k85.

 

[DeletedUser]

bicky hardly necessary, daz knew what i meant as did the rest other than you, but im not surprised.
so it was just coincidence the two accounts attacked at the same time? shesh i must have been mighty unlucky:lol:

anyway im not bothered, im still here and PKs has control of k85.

good comeback "NOT" :icon_rolleyes:

 

[DeletedUser]

bicky hardly necessary, daz knew what i meant as did the rest other than you, but im not surprised.

Just for the record.. the reason i seldom quote more than a tiny part of your quotes to reply to is I usually have NO idea what you mean. Bicky is a pool of clarity by comparison.. probably why you're the one person he can regularly own on the PnP.

so it was just coincidence the two accounts attacked at the same time?

I actually had 3 players attack me at the same time once.. can't we set something up where everyone takes turns attacking so these random events of getting attacked by more than one player at a time can finally be stopped? Actually, i think I saw that as a suggestion on some tribe's profile right below ' the senseless nobling of active players will not be tolerated'.

 

[DeletedUser]

im pointing out the fact that it wasnt just a random event daz even if you cant admit it. but i dont care, go back to p18 gollum

 

[DeletedUser]

im pointing out the fact that it wasnt just a random event daz even if you cant admit it. but i dont care, go back to p18 gollum

Why don't you post your pic on p42, scared?

 

[DeletedUser]

im pointing out the fact that it wasnt just a random event daz even if you cant admit it.

So if it wasn't a random event.. you're saying you suck regularly? What are we even arguing about? I'll admit that TbT, you've finally makin some sense.

 

[DeletedUser]

lawls haven't been on world 5 for quite a while. I never really thought SCI would get the crap beaten out of them, serves them right tho, for what they did to HOPLON.

 

[DeletedUser]

i was admitting 15 villages against over 200 arnt great odds and you couldn't do any better yourself. to lose just 4 in my opinion is a respectable lose. isnt there a new prequel lotr film they need you for?

 

[DeletedUser]

In case the wall of deletion isn't enough... I am here (now anyway) and OT is getting on my nerves (even though this is W5 where OT is the basis of the forums) Keep it to a minumum on the OT please

 

[DeletedUser]

Just a small update:

Side 1:
Tribes: 1337
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCIR0S SCIOVA
Players:

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 205
Side 2: 57
Difference: 148

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,831,539
Side 2: 552,849
Difference: 1,278,690

1337 vs. Sciros
[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: 1337
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCIR0S
Players:

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 147
Side 2: 57
Difference: 90

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,274,527
Side 2: 552,849
Difference: 721,678

[/spoil]

1337 vs. Sciova
[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: 1337
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCIOVA
Players:

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 58
Side 2: 0
Difference: 58

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 557,012
Side 2: 0
Difference: 557,012

[/spoil]

Just last week:
[spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: 1337
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: SCIR0S
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 52
Side 2: 3
Difference: 49

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 416,790
Side 2: 28,988
Difference: 387,802

[/spoil]