-4- vs ~KGD~

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: ~KGD~
Side 2:
Tribes: -4-, TWS, Ro, SOTP, ~FIRE~, EMP, ~COD~

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 787
Side 2: 891
Difference: 104

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 194
Side 2: 62
Difference: 132

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 5,199,403
Side 2: 3,036,770
Difference: 2,162,633

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,136,407
Side 2: 435,473
Difference: 700,934

chart


Enough said.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Add KGDMB please, even if it turns out worse for us with it. If we are going to be completely honest then lets be completely honest. You can't say your basher tribe isn't a part of this.

I am in no way denying the stats, I am but saying they don't tell the full story.

I honestly thought we were doomed when you guys took out fearless so fast... I was expecting us to be overwhelmed but my tribe has done me proud with how they have defended themselves. We are statistically better on the rankings now than when this war began which I find is a pleasant surprise.

Oh and here is a fun fact for you

TWS has fought against the following tribes: Phoenix, Night, Under construction, RAoV, Fearless and Boom. Now think - how many of those tribes are still around? We may not have taken them out - in fact we copped a hammering from most of them - but we are tenacious and we are here till the end.

Do you think KGD will hold true under such pressure? Especially considering that a good chunk of your tribe came from recruitment of those who did crack under the pressure.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Are you meaning to say that all of those tribes cracked under the rpessure of fighting TWS? *laughs* You are a funny fellow.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: ~KGD~, KGDMB
Side 2:
Tribes: TWS, -4-, Ro, SOTP, ~COD~, EMP, ~FIRE~

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 873
Side 2: 891
Difference: 18

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 224
Side 2: 69
Difference: 155

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 5,591,129
Side 2: 3,036,770
Difference: 2,554,359

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,278,108
Side 2: 466,848
Difference: 811,260

chart


All that did, was add 7 conquers to your side and 30 to ours.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
When you make wild claims you must have stats too back them up.

Now onto the point of barb nobling.

~KGD~ = 115 barbarian conquers coming to 8.6% of our total conquers. Obviously thats the majority of our points.

-4- = 135 barbarian conquers coming to 20.03% of their total conquers.

Now i'm assuming your in TWS so we'll get their stats up.

TWS = 539 barbarian conquers coming to 43.09% of your total conquers. Barbs are pretty hard to noble so i guess you deserve some kudos.

Now lets compare the three top tribes with ~KGD~.

Happy = 539 barbarian conquers coming to 26.2% of their total conquers.

Infamy= 519 barbarian conquers coming to 14.15% of their total conquers.

4Play = 89 barbarian conquers coming to 6.28% of their total conquers.

Again please put in some research before mindlessly spouting off complete rubbish.


I detest this stats thank you.

Tourist you have clearly been shown to be a turtle or a hoarder of nukes with your terrible ODA for how many villages you have.

Do not bring up happys barb nobling stats when everyone on this world knows why we were forced to noble them

You would have too right?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Richard i'm pretty sure everyone knows the reason for your barbarian conquers percent and it added to ours too.

The reason i brought up the other 3 tribes was as a comparison, nothing more nothing less.

Too be perfectly honest it doesn't matter how much you dislike the stats, they are there for everyone too see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Are you meaning to say that all of those tribes cracked under the rpessure of fighting TWS? *laughs* You are a funny fellow.

I think he is just sincerely proud of the fact that his tribe, despite getting hammered, is still around when other, much larger tribes have given up.

His honesty and humility is actually refreshing on the PnP. Good luck Isfrael and keep having fun :)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Thanks Kr1m - I know it didn't add much but it is the proper stats and is what is should be.

And thanks Vilja that is exactly what I am, proud of my tribe.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Richard i'm pretty sure everyone knows the reason for your barbarian conquers percent and it added to ours too.

The reason i brought up the other 3 tribes was as a comparison, nothing more nothing less.

Too be perfectly honest it doesn't matter how much you dislike the stats, they are there for everyone too see.

It added to yours too what?

internalling a whole k of barbs with like 2million points? :icon_eek:
 

cromptonjd

Guest
I detest this stats thank you.

Tourist you have clearly been shown to be a turtle or a hoarder of nukes with your terrible ODA for how many villages you have.

Do not bring up happys barb nobling stats when everyone on this world knows why we were forced to noble them

You would have too right?

And I detest the illogical nonsense that you spout about ODA. Do you really think that an ODA vs villages captured ratio show who the best players are? Personally, I'd prefer to aim for low ODA per village captured, as if it is high, that means I've either been hitting stacked targets when there are easy nobles around, or I've been killing off troops without finishing up and nobling the villages.

To put it concisely, if you were facing a player of ten villages, with the two closest to you stacked, would you attack these for the ODA? or would you noble his other villages to take out those troops without having to actually fight them and lose troops?

I won't stand for any more of this ODA elitist nonsense.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
LOL ODA shows you attack.

If you have high ODA it does NOT mean you have been hitting mass stacked targets as you have just said.

Just means you like nuking and attacking.

Go to village, rally point, simulator and throw in 100k 100k stack see how much ODA you get from that lol.

Compared to size of 1million he should have a higher ODA in my opinion .
 

cromptonjd

Guest
Attacking is only one part of the game along with Defending and networking (for PAs/ joining tribes) Having a high ODA means nothing.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I could take Happy members as an example and use this, but as this is a thread for -4- and ~KGD~ should we not keep it about -4- and ~KGD~?

I don't believe i have any -4- war points so discussing my ODA is a pointless excercise.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Attacking is only one part of the game along with Defending and networking (for PAs/ joining tribes) Having a high ODA means nothing.

A high Oda means a darn lot more than having relatively no/little oda .

Or we going with the case the bigger you are the better you are :icon_rolleyes:

Yes tourist you could, I could then point further to other members. ALl members have players who dont have ODA.

I am just giving my opinion on the matter to this fool.
 

DeletedUser100354

Guest
When you make wild claims you must have stats too back them up.

Now onto the point of barb nobling.

~KGD~ = 115 barbarian conquers coming to 8.6% of our total conquers. Obviously thats the majority of our points.

-4- = 135 barbarian conquers coming to 20.03% of their total conquers.

Now i'm assuming your in TWS so we'll get their stats up.

TWS = 539 barbarian conquers coming to 43.09% of your total conquers. Barbs are pretty hard to noble so i guess you deserve some kudos.

Now lets compare the three top tribes with ~KGD~.

Happy = 539 barbarian conquers coming to 26.2% of their total conquers.

Infamy= 519 barbarian conquers coming to 14.15% of their total conquers.

4Play = 89 barbarian conquers coming to 6.28% of their total conquers.

Again please put in some research before mindlessly spouting off complete rubbish.

hmm, on Happy's behalf, they did noble out noobs on ice's left over barbarian villages if im not correct and that was plenty of barbarians. (sorry if im wrong)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
You are correct, however I put up their stats as a comparison to ~KGD~ to disprove notmoving's point about us being barb noblers, which was also the reason I didn't make a comment on their stats.
 

DeletedUser96707

Guest
I detest this stats thank you.

Tourist you have clearly been shown to be a turtle or a hoarder of nukes with your terrible ODA for how many villages you have.

Do not bring up happys barb nobling stats when everyone on this world knows why we were forced to noble them

Considering clearing no morale barbs versus 30-50% morale players i guess its pretty obvious why some of the large rim players has relatively small oda compared to large core players. On the topic of the war I do not see why KGD leadership tries to hide the fact they are failing against -4- with the fact that they are fighting other noob tribes as they call them? Surely -4- being the biggest one it should be prioritized the most and choosing not to is a failure in itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

erion111

Guest
well well, we have to look at the big picture here, KGD is in hard position now and with a large border to defend , we have to understand that they are in the border with the most power full tribe in this world and they can not use all their forces on the -4- front. Im my opinion they are doing pretty good but time will tell if they have the strength to stand the war that will come in the south .
 

DeletedUser49595

Guest
[23:09:33] Darth's minion: Wingedpig, you're a bit talker, a small ''doer'', you don't know what's a war this world, do you? Nope, the only thing you did is either internal nobling your mates, nobling your bashers and your academy tribe members:
this is to remember your noble conquers: Wingedpig Conquers

You know if i was in your or your bashers tribe i'd be scared of you, but as i'm not in either or a barbarian then i don't think i have to panic yet ;P

Also, HAPPY members CAN'T talk as they just merged with PPL to avoid war... Tsss, sure you guys didn't waste a lot of troops...

To the others, it's simple, Yeah, KGD's big, but how come it can fight on all fronts? We need to fight -4- at the north, some happy at the east and on the south side...
MAP
Then, sure we can't support the ones that are fighting on other fronts... we'll not let all our villages empty while we're already fighting...

So i suggest to all those talk shitter to shut their mouth, and enjoy the ascension of KGD
 
Top