While I was hoping tornado777 would join me. He refused saying he had some friends in NES that wanted to join Funny. I told him, if Funny doesn't allow them then ask them to join Blood as they are stronger than NES. He replied "No way, NES is much stronger than Blood." Then he told me he would rather rejoin NES with them than have them join Blood!?!
How in the world could he even compare them?
1) Yes, NES has more "points"
2) Average point per player - Blood wins hands down.
3) Take away any barb eating and any same-tribe eating and blood is more active than NES.
So, how could he even think that NES was stronger????? I don't get it. Am I blind? OBJECTIONABLY speaking (please don't let your feelings for either tribe get in the way), am I correct that Blood is stronger than NES??? Please feel free to tell me I am wrong, I don't mind, but please explain. To me - activity and average points are extremely important when it comes to determine strength. I know I have not been playing this game a long time, but I thought I learned enough to determine which tribe is stronger than another.
Any comments?
Thanks!
Space Alien