DeletedUser
Guest
Why argue objective things when you can use something that has nothing to do with HP? That way you can't counter argue.
It's a solid form of argument to either the person who has no basic identification of qualitiy in one's argument, and works equally well on those who agree with you, before they read. It doesn't persuade the educated masses, but if it's popular vote you want, why bother? Right?:lol:
Oh no, no way for me to prove the speghetti monster doesn't exist. Clearly, if that's the case Amish must be an elite.:lol:
Oh yeah, Lady Kathrine's good since I can't disprove the Sasquatch since no matter how many frauds exist, there could still be one wherever we weren't looking.
Elvis still lives since I can't prove that wrong, which is why uncle.sam beat me, of course!
And Oxotower is good because I can't prove tupac wasn't resurrected.
It all makes sense now. WAAO won because fairy tales do exist. And war is never the way to go since hugs are what the princes and princesses in fairy tales use, not wars.
It's a solid form of argument to either the person who has no basic identification of qualitiy in one's argument, and works equally well on those who agree with you, before they read. It doesn't persuade the educated masses, but if it's popular vote you want, why bother? Right?:lol:
Oh no, no way for me to prove the speghetti monster doesn't exist. Clearly, if that's the case Amish must be an elite.:lol:
Oh yeah, Lady Kathrine's good since I can't disprove the Sasquatch since no matter how many frauds exist, there could still be one wherever we weren't looking.
Elvis still lives since I can't prove that wrong, which is why uncle.sam beat me, of course!
And Oxotower is good because I can't prove tupac wasn't resurrected.
It all makes sense now. WAAO won because fairy tales do exist. And war is never the way to go since hugs are what the princes and princesses in fairy tales use, not wars.
Last edited by a moderator: