Above V.S. Below

DeletedUser

Guest
Nice???.....erm dont know that word mate.....think I've been playing this game too long
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Not now,not then, or not ever will 3DX attack FID, unless FID attack us first. We have a STRONG NAP and will support FID in ANY way they request. And FYI 3DX informed FID about the World Wide Plot to take FID out, with your intel you requested from us. We never accepted your joint forum invite, because we are LOYAL to our NAPs.. And we expect the same from our our NAPs.

Thanks, Stainmaker Leader of 3DX

And Stain we thank you for that, it was rather wondeful thing having over half the tribes involved come to us giving us the info, but as we talk regularly with 3DX the exchange of knowledge was indeed very high.

Well this isn't about 3DX in this thread now is it?

And this thread becomes about 3DX when someone posts things from a forum with the leader of Below in stating he will gain 3DX's help against Fid =)
 

pudge.d.butcher

Guest
KillRage was with k67 people right ?? sorry i have quit , just came back see how this is going on ..

hi stez !!
 

DeletedUser

Guest
So, although I quit a few days ago, I thought I'd post some more war stats, for your entertainment.

Side 1:
Tribes: Above
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Below
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 21
Side 2: 4
Difference: 17

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 134,333
Side 2: 25,759
Difference: 108,574

chart
 

pudge.d.butcher

Guest
I GOT THIS >>


Side 1:
Tribes: Above FID
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Below K67
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 72
Side 2: 72
Difference: 0

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 568,699
Side 2: 570,271
Difference: 1,572

chart
 
Last edited:

pudge.d.butcher

Guest
also this >>>

Good WAR !! or FID slacking Hardcore ??

Side 1:
Tribes: Above FID
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Below K67
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 353
Side 2: 339
Difference: 14

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 72
Side 2: 72
Difference: 0

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 2,472,827
Side 2: 2,211,015
Difference: 261,812

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 568,699
Side 2: 570,271
Difference: 1,572

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
More a matter of Below having the jump on FID. Give it two weeks, check the stats again. Then you'll get a good view of who stands where.
 

pudge.d.butcher

Guest
people jumping ships isn't exactly warfare, call it bullying maybe (?) ..NONE of these stats reflects the true picture .... there are just too man external factors to consider ..

but then someone trying to defame something for no apparent reason is also not appreciated .
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Above is above below in terms of where they are on the map..however below is above ABOVE in terms of points...if that makes sense to you
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Above is actually just more West on the map - neither below nor above Below.
 

swordalchemist

Guest
ya...but above is below below in terms of war stats...and to the leaders of above and below....get better names...trying being a litttle bit more creative....
 

Deathstar759

Guest
Here are some updated war stats :)

Side 1:
Tribes: Below
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Above
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 10
Side 2: 2
Difference: 8

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 61,664
Side 2: 14,026
Difference: 47,638

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: Below
Players:

Side 2:
Tribes: Above FID
Players:

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 22
Side 2: 5
Difference: 17

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 161,344
Side 2: 40,829
Difference: 120,515

chart
 
Top