DeletedUser
Guest
I have no reason to doubt your position so I will take your word for it but now you probably understand a little more as to why I don't agree with the manner in which you guys 'won'.
In regards to your other post:
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it? From the sentence it is fairly obvious that "or" is meant to be "to".
Once again you are arguing semantics
Your strategy was ally as many people as possible until you outnumbered the opposition by an insurmountable quantity. What Bella and others find funny is that you seem to be proud of this accomplishment. Even your chronicles were pretty humorous, they were essentially "I managed this merge, then this merge, then this merge" lol.
You seem to equate someone not using the same strategy as you as some sort of lacking on their part. When the truth of the matter is some people actually joined the game to play and have fun. I know for a fact most of you disliked this game and only created a mass alliance with a twofold mission, allow yourselves to be lazy and to end the game as soon as possible while gaining some sort of consolation pseudo victory.
It's funny to me that you equate this "victory" with skill and superiority to the opposition. The opposition never wanted to bend the rules in the way that you did, because they didn't have the same goals as you.
Nowhere in her post does she state that she is the ultimate authority on what constitutes good play. Nowhere does she even suggest it or hint it in fact. If you read it again, you will see she states what she considers in her personal opinion to be good play. She specifically states " is not something I consider as good sportsmanship" Notice the use of the word "I" to denote ownership of the opinion and to isolate the opinion as hers and hers alone (although I am sure many share the opinion, myself included).
She acknowledged your game, and acknowledged it was not true to the spirit of the game. Why would she adapt to your play style when such would have required her to play in the same style which you already know she disagrees with? A classic case of stooping to the level of someone else. Not all people would throw their morals out so easily. It is irrelevant as to whether you consider your play style to be cheap or otherwise; she considered it cheap, so to do the same would have been throwing her moral character out the window, for a game. It is obvious to me that you do not know her in the least.
The last sentence of your quote is just pathetic to be honest, not even worthy of a response.
Lol, I'm guessing next you will say that I too am a sore loser? It's funny that I have noticed a recurring theme in your posts, all of your opinions are facts, and you are of course never wrong.
In regards to your other post:
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it? From the sentence it is fairly obvious that "or" is meant to be "to".
Once again you are arguing semantics
Your strategy was ally as many people as possible until you outnumbered the opposition by an insurmountable quantity. What Bella and others find funny is that you seem to be proud of this accomplishment. Even your chronicles were pretty humorous, they were essentially "I managed this merge, then this merge, then this merge" lol.
You seem to equate someone not using the same strategy as you as some sort of lacking on their part. When the truth of the matter is some people actually joined the game to play and have fun. I know for a fact most of you disliked this game and only created a mass alliance with a twofold mission, allow yourselves to be lazy and to end the game as soon as possible while gaining some sort of consolation pseudo victory.
It's funny to me that you equate this "victory" with skill and superiority to the opposition. The opposition never wanted to bend the rules in the way that you did, because they didn't have the same goals as you.
Nowhere in her post does she state that she is the ultimate authority on what constitutes good play. Nowhere does she even suggest it or hint it in fact. If you read it again, you will see she states what she considers in her personal opinion to be good play. She specifically states " is not something I consider as good sportsmanship" Notice the use of the word "I" to denote ownership of the opinion and to isolate the opinion as hers and hers alone (although I am sure many share the opinion, myself included).
She acknowledged your game, and acknowledged it was not true to the spirit of the game. Why would she adapt to your play style when such would have required her to play in the same style which you already know she disagrees with? A classic case of stooping to the level of someone else. Not all people would throw their morals out so easily. It is irrelevant as to whether you consider your play style to be cheap or otherwise; she considered it cheap, so to do the same would have been throwing her moral character out the window, for a game. It is obvious to me that you do not know her in the least.
The last sentence of your quote is just pathetic to be honest, not even worthy of a response.
Lol, I'm guessing next you will say that I too am a sore loser? It's funny that I have noticed a recurring theme in your posts, all of your opinions are facts, and you are of course never wrong.
