archers-r they worth it?

DeletedUser

Guest
no i don't think i was at 100% i believe it was near 35-40%.

sorry i thought the comment was ment as a sort of certanty. i didn't think to consider moral.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
its ok well all make mistakes. Also now with the church factor its going to make that and moral a huge hit
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i've noticed that a few players don't use archers. i don't understand this.

i always assumed archers, or more spacifically MA, were a main conponent for most nukes???
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Always Always put at least 500 in a nuke as i learned this by fighting on frontlines cause at the fronts Archers are very plentiful
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yeah thats what i thought. i've not used nukes that often (probably why i get owned so much. lol)

but i new they almost always had archers. i used to have a nuke guide that had a type of nuke built around MA but when my world 13 account got deleted i lost it.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
We have one of those. But ya i lost like 40 nukes recently, it sucks trust me.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
archers are very useful. no one bother making mounted archers so the archers to huge damage to the nukes. Awesome units archers :p
 

DeletedUser

Guest
=SK= Ace said:
We have one of those. But ya i lost like 40 nukes recently, it sucks trust me.
Click to expand...


couldn't sort me out a copy could you???

the problem is that this early in the game most haven't got the resources or the space for loads of archers. at the minate i would say keep it something like 1 archer for every...what 3 sp.or sw???

that should work as an adequet defence????

(this is just off the top of my head)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
right now i personally wont use archers until later as they cost way to much right now in this stage of the game, ill see what i can do
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i've got a couple but i doubt i'll build more. (unless i lose what i have already)

i'm guessing with bp ending in a couple of days i'm doing what everyone is doing...building more troops.

if i have the resources and space (depending on my other troops count) i may get a few more but as i said above, i doubt it.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
yea right now i havent researched them yet cause ive been trying to make any many lc as i can but once i can get a better farm i think i will start making archers and lay off the sword and spear to balance out the defense a lil better
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Not sure if this has been posted yet, but just from a stand point view, wouldn't you think Archers would be great because then you can focus less on defensive troops while you can focus more on offense or building up your village. Because 'most' people don't even build MA in the beginning.

But then again they are costly at the beginning stages:icon_wink: lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
anybody know at what points your village looks different on the map? i know 300 is the first but is it the only? and if not when else does it change?
and yea i know its off topic but i was just curious
 

mattcurr

Guest
philiesonn said:
anybody know at what points your village looks different on the map? I know 300 is the first but is it the only? And if not when else does it change?
And yea i know its off topic but i was just curious
Click to expand...

300,1000,3000,9000,11000
 

Jokert

Guest
Like every unit, archers have their place. Unfortunately during the early stages of a world, this place has not yet developed. Later on they are extremely useful against many nukes, but they obviously can't hold up without support from other defenses to sort out their weaknesses. So are they worth it? Yes, but only under the right conditions. Otherwise they are a waste of resources that are much better used other places, which although may not be as effective, make up for their lack in quantitys able to be produced by the resources saved by the archers. Just my Two cents, flame away if you want :icon_twisted:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Jokert said:
Like every unit, archers have their place. Unfortunately during the early stages of a world, this place has not yet developed. Later on they are extremely useful against many nukes, but they obviously can't hold up without support from other defenses to sort out their weaknesses. So are they worth it? Yes, but only under the right conditions. Otherwise they are a waste of resources that are much better used other places, which although may not be as effective, make up for their lack in quantitys able to be produced by the resources saved by the archers. Just my Two cents, flame away if you want :icon_twisted:
Click to expand...

what unit would u pair with them? swords to counter their weakness for mounted archers?
 

darkthief

Guest
King Bowser Koopa said:
Early as in during BP? Early as in with 1 village? 2 villages? What?

I build MA in my first nuke with my first village. If you aren't using MA in your basic nuke at the beginning of the game you are limiting your ability to attack effectively and in turn limiting your potential.
Click to expand...

Early as in 1 village. MA are a waste in Nukes in your first village because no one trains Archers early in the game. MA takes much time and resources for training in the early part of the game. having 1 village early i mean.:icon_eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
MA are useless against archers unless the archers have crap all support from spears/swords/HC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top