DeletedUser2515
Guest
because you will be leaving more groups of people who are supposedly more knowledgible and more experienced and better at the game or what have you to destroy potential threats to themselves and thus gain an even greater advantage than they would already have.
POKE may be a threat to you right now, in your eyes, but the way I see it there are a lot of threats. A lot of big groups that may take things over. The more competition they have and the more fighting they do with people that can compete the weaker they all become and thus the better for those who are outside of them.
But maybe that's just my take on it. I just see no reason to band together to make things easier with people who already stated they want (and will take) your villages.
edit- I have two things I remembered I wanna say!
1- knownone is an ass. If you read the things he typed and seen him insult someone earlier in this thread, you should be able to agree. Especially if you use it in it's proper context as I did. So there is no actual need for the quotation marks around it, just assume I am calling him exactly what the dictionary says. Something like "A vain, self-important, silly, or aggressively stupid person."
2- I like the way you type. You have much more character in how you say things than most of the people around these parts, and I'm not referring to the capitalization you use, just your manner in typed word.
POKE may be a threat to you right now, in your eyes, but the way I see it there are a lot of threats. A lot of big groups that may take things over. The more competition they have and the more fighting they do with people that can compete the weaker they all become and thus the better for those who are outside of them.
But maybe that's just my take on it. I just see no reason to band together to make things easier with people who already stated they want (and will take) your villages.
edit- I have two things I remembered I wanna say!
1- knownone is an ass. If you read the things he typed and seen him insult someone earlier in this thread, you should be able to agree. Especially if you use it in it's proper context as I did. So there is no actual need for the quotation marks around it, just assume I am calling him exactly what the dictionary says. Something like "A vain, self-important, silly, or aggressively stupid person."
2- I like the way you type. You have much more character in how you say things than most of the people around these parts, and I'm not referring to the capitalization you use, just your manner in typed word.
Last edited: