Great for first sig!
Hmmm, I most sigs lacks an important aspects.
It's the proper use of render.
The render.... or in the other words are... SUBJECT of the signature.
The mostly used render on a sig is a famous anime char.
On your sigs, you have slapped too many renders on your sigs, in which would really not be the object since most TW sigs aren't about the sigs and their fancy details and renders. It's all about the text.
Typography will make or break a sig.
Look at this sig, bad typography.
[spoil]
[/spoil]
Compare it with a sig like this
[spoil]
[/spoil]
See the difference? A sig of fail typography would overall fail.
Look at the nice subtle effect on the name.
And look at those sigs, there were only 1 and only 1 render. Nothing else.
Look at the flow too. Both sigs have a good flow IMO, but the first sig was a fail because of the font used.
PS. Disregard the "TITANS" labeled on the second sig.
Flow.
I really can't see any major flows in your sig.
Take a look of this sig....
[spoil]
[/spoil]
Noticed the left to right movement of the parts of the sig?
[spoil]
[/spoil]
That sig also has a good flow, the flow was enhanced by the penning and the motion blur.
Also, I also keep in my borders on my sig uniformed. 3 pixels, center.
Dark sigs have dark borders
like this one
[spoil]
[/spoil]
Bright sigs have bright borders
like this one
[spoil]
[/spoil]
Hope that helps,
PM me if you still need more help, I may not be great but I already been messing with PS for quite a long time. :icon_biggrin: