We should ban nobling barbs 2k or below
now that would would be fun...and stiker, remember. Picture the world vs stiker & pherion...
/me jumps up and down wavingnow that would would be fun...
would be a top 5 tribe to...although we would need three more people to show up as a tribe...
(would choose some other mates that I like better but geographically this works out better)
right theres would be 121 million point tribe with 6 members :lol:
we should do it for kicks.
<3Set to 3 day nobling.
Let me rephrase it.thats a s*** load of internals then!
What are you on about? Where did I say that Hawks didn't have more barb nobles than Legion? (in the last 3months) I was simply pointing out that those are conquers for everything, which I assumed drunk didn't notice, and thought all those nobles in the NW were barbs. So if you don't have anything constructive to say, don't say anything at all please.we've already shown the number of barb noblings by hawks, why are you trying to justify how the map looks? :icon_rolleyes:
the 450 stiker/barb nobles were pbbly not that backline were they?
I said, and quote: "Backline - Obviously internal/barbs - But barbs heavily outnumber internals (on both sides)" - So your bs is no use here.I will say whatever I want to say thank you very much. you said the ones in the backline are pbbly internals/barbs, I was pointing out that that's not necessarily true.
"The reason it looks like all barbs/internals on hawks side, is because the front is slanted towards the left, leaving a smaller part of the world (N-W) and making it look like WWIII - Day of the barbs."
there was absolutely no need for this if all you were doing is explaining what type of conquers are included.