So the way to top 50 is by nobling bunch of barbs?
o.o Like I can understand if you have nothing els around you. But...cmon...
So the way to top 50 is by nobling bunch of barbs?
o.o Like I can understand if you have nothing els around you. But...cmon...
It's really just sad tbh.
Growth Strategy is all out of the Window.
Dare I say "honor" in TW is out of the window.
Everyone was seriously frowned upon for nobling barbs. Now, everyone is playing like old world newbies now. There used to be rules in tribes, no barb ennoblement. Anyone has more than 10 barbs? You're a barb whxxx.
Look at the state now.
It's really just sad tbh.
Growth Strategy is all out of the Window.
Dare I say "honor" in TW is out of the window.
Everyone was seriously frowned upon for nobling barbs. Now, everyone is playing like old world newbies now. There used to be rules in tribes, no barb ennoblement. Anyone has more than 10 barbs? You're a barb whxxx.
Look at the state now.
So based on everyone telling me, I should focus on nobling barbs? lol
Yes players used to noble old world barbs but that was mostly in late game because there was nothing better to do in the interim of wars or random nukes and nobling as there were way too many nobles in reserve.
Right now, its like a chicken and egg situation I believe. People are so desperate to win these worlds at any cost (including PP), that they have started nobling barbs and this isn't out of necessity. This is because they just don't want to lose troops. Literally the whole essence of the game has been destroyed. I get your point fully about the barb being low points but as far as I recall, that was the exact justification used by 100s if players to say not to noble. Maybe if you put it in retrospect with all the events and PP, etc. Even so, I can't seem to justify it.
But the sad situation is because 1 person is doing it, everyone has to follow suit to catchup. Oh he is doing it. f it. Let me do so as well. So another 2 do it and so on.
It isn't in reality. Just a faster way to end the world and nothing else. You don't have to take my argument seriously buddy. If you have played the older worlds, you would know exactly what I'm talking about. It might be a good strategy but it ruins the game.I am honestly struggling to take your argument seriously.
You just said, if 1 player does this tactic, others need to do it too to keep up. Doesn't that mean, this is a good strategy, that gives you an advantage over others who don't do it?
You are wasting your time my friend.
They don't understand the point.
This isn't the same game as years ago. Can't compare the playstyle when worlds had 20x the player-base, no PP options, no events every 2 weeks & when worlds didn't open every 2 months. Nobody said this is fun, I explained above why it is like this and why it will stay like this unless Inno makes changes, which they won't bc this is all about money nowadays. If you prefer worlds similar to the ones in past play Classic worlds as they're basically "old" TW with a smaller player-base.
So you are just hating on a superior tactic, because "it ruins the game" (most likely meaning you can't keep up).It isn't in reality. Just a faster way to end the world and nothing else. You don't have to take my argument seriously buddy. If you have played the older worlds, you would know exactly what I'm talking about. It might be a good strategy but it ruins the game.