Bush, SOHK VS MIKE, -SWAT-

[One Last Shot...]

the title doesnt say:

BUSH, SOHK vs MIKE, -SWAT-

it says world at war. which my stats has can go here and they are not pointless, as we are at war with them.

This thread has been made for the above purpose. To have a thread which is only for discussion of the ongoing war between the SOHK and Bush alliance, with the MIKE and -SWAT- alliance.


Statistics then.


Last Week's statistics.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: SOHK, Bush
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, MIKE

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 86
Side 2: 40
Difference: 46

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 811,250
Side 2: 372,967
Difference: 438,283

[/SPOIL]

Last Month's Statistics.
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: SOHK, Bush
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, MIKE

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 410
Side 2: 97
Difference: 313

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 3,732,143
Side 2: 914,266
Difference: 2,817,877

[/SPOIL]

Since The Start
[SPOIL]Side 1:
Tribes: SOHK, Bush
Side 2:
Tribes: -SWAT-, MIKE

Timeframe: 12/11/2011 00:48:18 to 26/01/2012 19:50:00

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 774
Side 2: 133
Difference: 641

Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 7,114,953
Side 2: 1,251,055
Difference: 5,863,898

[/SPOIL]

 

[One Last Shot...]

:lol: In W52, my mates really laughing at you. Don't worry we will take you off of W52

Confidence, I like it. I'm waiting for you to come for me :icon_wink:

 

[DeletedUser]

don't worry we will see

 

[DeletedUser]

Confidence, I like it. I'm waiting for you to come for me :icon_wink:

Confidence and unjustified arrogance are two different terms ...

 

[DeletedUser]

Like this?

 

[DeletedUser]

So 2 tribes can attack and win against 1 player with no tribe to support him...

Its taken you over a month aswell and he still has over 50% of his max points.

 

[One Last Shot...]

Like this?

He is not, nor ever has been, in SOHK or Bush. Nor has he been working alongside SOHK or Bush to the best of my knowledge, which is pretty substantial.

This thread was made to avoid having irrelevant statistics being spammed to derail the topic - if you wish to brag about your ability to take out a single ex-Phat player not involved in any way in the topic of this thread, please use the other thread.

 

[DeletedUser]

Look ... I do assume you CAN read? It says 'Mike, SWAT' vs. 'SOHK, Bush'

It doesn't mention, in any sort: 'kid bragging about player in useless tribe being destroyed, barely even by said kids troops'

So please, if in any way possible: use your brain.

 

[DeletedUser]

Look ... I do assume you CAN read? It says 'Mike, SWAT' vs. 'SOHK, Bush'

It doesn't mention, in any sort: 'kid bragging about player in useless tribe being destroyed, barely even by said kids troops'

So please, if in any way possible: use your brain.

not matter he was in Phat. Phat is SOHK/Bush's familly

 

[DeletedUser]

not matter he was in Phat. Phat is SOHK/Bush's familly

I'm going to say it once though.. Phat is not a part of sohk or bush. Nor are any of these tribes a family.

 

[DeletedUser]

not matter he was in Phat. Phat is SOHK/Bush's familly

Yeah. And this topic is called Bush and SOHK vs Mike and SWAT, kiddo. Can't wait to get to you and see you quit for 'real life' reasons ...

 

[DeletedUser]

I'm going to say it once though.. Phat is not a part of sohk or bush. Nor are any of these tribes a family.

lalalalala idc i know they're your family trust me :icon_biggrin:

that's why bush/sohk sent a lot of support to phat in North :icon_eek:

don't worry we will rim your family in North

 

[DeletedUser]

Hang on, would this 'rimming' happen before or after phat's players go barbarian?

 

[DeletedUser]

not matter he was in Phat. Phat is SOHK/Bush's familly

I am all for fair stats posting. Tribes working directly with either side should be included in the war stats- it's why we invited those tribes to join the war after SWAT joined MIKE's war with Bush, and they can be found in the war statistics in-game. This was to keep all stats related to the war in one place and to prevent these types of arguments.

People who were actively losing villages and get kicked from a tribe should be included in war stats. People who are still fighting alongside their tribe but leave for their own reasons should be included in the war stats.

People I haven't heard of until their names were posted in this forum, those people should not be included any war stats that involve Bush. Phat, and offspring tribes from ex-phat members, are their own tribes who fight their own wars and they have their own thread in this forum for any stats you'd like to post about them. There is only one Phat member that we supported, but I've never seen any other war thread on any world I've played demand supported people be included in war stats for an unrelated tribe- especially when support was sent before Bush was a part of any wars being discussed in this thread.

There is no need to pad the stats. When these random players are no longer on this world, no one is going to remember that extra 168 villages from a solo player that were taken over the course of 3 months between 2 tribes. The only thing anyone will remember is that it took so long to take villages from someone who is not being supported by the tribes involved in this war.

 

[DeletedUser]

I am all for fair stats posting. Tribes working directly with either side should be included in the war stats- it's why we invited those tribes to join the war after SWAT joined MIKE's war with Bush, and they can be found in the war statistics in-game. This was to keep all stats related to the war in one place and to prevent these types of arguments.

People who were actively losing villages and get kicked from a tribe should be included in war stats. People who are still fighting alongside their tribe but leave for their own reasons should be included in the war stats.

People I haven't heard of until their names were posted in this forum, those people should not be included any war stats that involve Bush. Phat, and offspring tribes from ex-phat members, are their own tribes who fight their own wars and they have their own thread in this forum for any stats you'd like to post about them. There is only one Phat member that we supported, but I've never seen any other war thread on any world I've played demand supported people be included in war stats for an unrelated tribe- especially when support was sent before Bush was a part of any wars being discussed in this thread.

There is no need to pad the stats. When these random players are no longer on this world, no one is going to remember that extra 168 villages from a solo player that were taken over the course of 3 months between 2 tribes. The only thing anyone will remember is that it took so long to take villages from someone who is not being supported by the tribes involved in this war.

Maybe you should learn what you preach -SWAT- is it's own tribe you dont like when we added other tribes maybe try not doing the same and we could actually have some real stats all i see from your tribe is inflated stats manipulated to suit you then when we say something you argue it is pretty simple -SWAT- is it's own tribe.

 

[One Last Shot...]

Maybe you should learn what you preach -SWAT- is it's own tribe you dont like when we added other tribes maybe try not doing the same and we could actually have some real stats all i see from your tribe is inflated stats manipulated to suit you then when we say something you argue it is pretty simple -SWAT- is it's own tribe.

We posted up the war of the two alliances. Which are MIKE and -SWAT-, and SOHK and Bush. This thread was made to avoid the manipulation of statistics, as I whole-heartedly agree that we should be posting real statistics. Hence the real statistics displayed in the first post.

Now, if you wish to look for someone to blame for the manipulation of statistics, here was the comment before the random tribes began being added in:

youve forgotton to add phat to that. add them and look at the difference

At the request of your ally.


I'm all for stats to be posted fairly. The only fair way, is MIKE and -SWAT- versus Bush and SOHK. As you are working alongside MIKE, just as Bush is working alongside SOHK.

At the end of the day, it's just statistics.

If you believe you can win this war with your ally, you won't mind the statistics being shown with your ally included, whom both Bush and SOHK are fighting. My logic is, that if you believe the above, as I presume you do, you will know that you turn this war around you can show just how great -SWAT- and MIKE really are, by showing such a dramatic change in the tidings of this war.

If you want to include Bush and SOHK together, include MIKE and -SWAT- together. If you don't, you shouldn't have joined the war ingame with your ally, but made a separate one. That's fairly simple logic

 

[DeletedUser]

We posted up the war of the two alliances. Which are MIKE and -SWAT-, and SOHK and Bush. This thread was made to avoid the manipulation of statistics, as I whole-heartedly agree that we should be posting real statistics. Hence the real statistics displayed in the first post.

Now, if you wish to look for someone to blame for the manipulation of statistics, here was the comment before the random tribes began being added in:



At the request of your ally.


I'm all for stats to be posted fairly. The only fair way, is MIKE and -SWAT- versus Bush and SOHK. As you are working alongside MIKE, just as Bush is working alongside SOHK.

At the end of the day, it's just statistics.

If you believe you can win this war with your ally, you won't mind the statistics being shown with your ally included, whom both Bush and SOHK are fighting. My logic is, that if you believe the above, as I presume you do, you will know that you turn this war around you can show just how great -SWAT- and MIKE really are, by showing such a dramatic change in the tidings of this war.

If you want to include Bush and SOHK together, include MIKE and -SWAT- together. If you don't, you shouldn't have joined the war ingame with your ally, but made a separate one. That's fairly simple logic

Really there is no point even talking to you you just make an excuse time after time.

 

[One Last Shot...]

Really there is no point even talking to you you just make an excuse time after time.

You mean, you have no response you are able to give?

I was merely making a fairly simple explanation. You include Bush and SOHK together when you post stats. But you don't ever include MIKE. And yet you are saying you are your own tribe and so should be counted by yourselves - but don't apply that logic to Bush or SOHK.

Anyway, I'd appreciate it if you could answer the mail I sent ingame, if possible

 

[DeletedUser]

You're free to add Phat. It won't make a difference in the long run -- all you're doing is eating Phat accounts which can be counted as nearly barbarian in their fighting back level, and make your stats look good.

I still vouch to keep a single section for the people who want decent stats, meaning the sides actually FIGHTING. Not the ones getting eating and doing nuffin'.

 

[DeletedUser]

You're free to add Phat. It won't make a difference in the long run -- all you're doing is eating Phat accounts which can be counted as nearly barbarian in their fighting back level, and make your stats look good.

I still vouch to keep a single section for the people who want decent stats, meaning the sides actually FIGHTING. Not the ones getting eating and doing nuffin'.

Did i ever ask to add phat we beat them already so why would i care about adding them ? and were only eating phat ? lol