Countdown

DeletedUser94483

Guest
Maybe the reason he signs his name is because two people use the forum account?
 

ashoka1

Guest
Noone is going to gain a thing by this 85 day extension

Spam will still win the world

Tls and its cheat leaders will lose

And I will make sire innogames doesnt earn anything extra as well and pay pp to 100 players for winning w60.So inno games doesnt make any money by this extending of world.
 

DeletedUser108293

Guest
sam or matt?

obvisiously its fun for you to make your failure last 90 days longer :D
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Haha I cant believe that this world is still going, I thought we won like 2 years ago when I quit :D
 

DeletedUser108293

Guest
You would think that but SPAM are too lazy
Sam

You would thing we already won but with some dirty cheating tactics, together with Butonel, CY and C8 you can prolong a world for 90 days. Not that the result would be any different.:icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser94483

Guest
No evidence of cheating as no bans handed out...So pondering that...tactics used though I disagree with them are no less dirty then the ones spam have used the entire war...Also the inability to keep the players of what happened straight is rather funny.
 

DeletedUser94059

Guest
No evidence of cheating as no bans handed out...So pondering that...tactics used though I disagree with them are no less dirty then the ones spam have used the entire war...Also the inability to keep the players of what happened straight is rather funny.

I do have to say you are a bit of Dick..
 

DeletedUser94483

Guest
I am very honest about things...I never deny your claim..I am just not bothered if people feel that way about me. I say things the way I see them if someone disagrees I give them a chance to prove themselves if they cant I call them on it. I try to live by a very simple philosphy twitchesd...Honesty trumps courtesy.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I cant remember when we used other accounts to disband tribes, so please enlighten me. Dylan has answered you time and time again and when presented with evidence/our side of it you just drift off and refuse to answer. Then come back and start up the discussion again some days/weeks later with the same piss poor arguement about SPAM doing the same. How someone became staff with your posts/behaviour is beyond me.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
No evidence of cheating as no bans handed out...So pondering that...tactics used though I disagree with them are no less dirty then the ones spam have used the entire war...Also the inability to keep the players of what happened straight is rather funny.
People keep saying that SPAM uses dirty tactics but when asked for evidence they have nothing. We won because we were better, not because we played dirty. This seems to be a rhetoric in *TLS*, an excuse you use for losing, a drug to ease the pain. I thought you were supposed to win, this 60% was in the bag after SPAM "lucked" it out when we won the Calm. war and won the secrets condition.

What players from *TLS* don't seem to understand, which I can get since none of them have been in SPAM at SPAM's height, is that we won because we were miles better than the competition. SPAM has played against the best tribes this world has to offer and we have just outfought them. We didn't recruit anyone whilst the fight was there, we didn't (or at least I) never spied or have seen an enemy forum or done any back handed diplomacy or planting and we certainly did not disband an enemy tribe because we were losing. Putting me and the rest of SPAM on the same level as *TLS* is insulting and downright wrong.

We won fair and square. Just accept it already and move on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser94483

Guest
The reason I never take the time to go into it is because FINDING the evidence that I know of from a year ago+ is just to much effort.

If you want the list of events I can throw that out. Just not going to spend MY time looking up the actual occurrences.

Lets start with the very beginning(I congrat you on fighting back in the way jfsmith fought you regarding the first win I do not care about that) you offered a deal to an entire group of tribes that had been mostly at war with each other an amount of time that though on paper looked reasonable anyone knowing the politics of the world knew was an unrealistic timeframe. Made the conditions fit to benefit your tribe(no real blame there but when you are preaching your superiority in combat you should not be stacking the deck which is where it goes from iffy/ok to slightly dirty).

The beginning of the actual war started out like any good war ops abounded, some players did not have the stomach to stay and fight whether they came under fire or not this is not your fault at all and can be attributed to the players chosen to fight...but what does come down is your recruitment of frontline players AFTER they had worked out to get stacked against you. This caused you a direct benefit and unless you are NOT in control of your recruit button...recruiting an enemy player in the middle of a war you claim you could win even if you put a few of your players on our side...becomes dirty.

Through out the year you slowly give players in tls reasons not to fight by NOT engaging them and allowing them to get swallowed up in local player grief and then offered them recruitment...sound TACTICS if dirty for claiming to be "superior" in combat...none of your recruitment had nothing to do with your combat skills. Merely how well you could use your lack of combat with a player to make joining you look promising combined with a mass to make any REAL fight against you an uphill battle with your continued recruitment.

Recruitment of war targets is not in and itself dirty..gray area yes but not dirty. It only becomes dirty when you think you can walk around talking about how great of fighters you are. At that point those become dirty tactics as they have nothing to do with your claims but make your claims look valid.

There is more but without reviewing all the old posts not going to open my mouth to it.

The way you won the world was fair because of how it started to end. Kudos to you. Recruiting our players after our members disbanded your tribe fair. One dirty trade allows another. I will admit your position looks insurmountable...I did not join in this war caring about surmountable odds. Never have. Despite having recruited players that have very little in the way of real war stats and are NOW actually nobling enemy targets quickly is a curiosity though...Love as soon as they turn spam the speed that their nobles fly to player owned villages...either account sat or more underhand...now since I have called some of these players good over the past year and defended some of them at times when their real life took precedence I find it hard to believe what the EVIDENCE shows...
 

DeletedUser94483

Guest
Not blaming you for the recruit ashoka...Blaming the players for leaving. You did what you did for your reasons but them leaving was disappointing.
 
Top