Critique Thread

[DeletedUser]

1) I made that pattern (it's part of the tut)
2) I forgot about a focal, I still need to edit it all so I'll go back and work on that

tut

 

[DeletedUser]

This piece took me like 2h30m but it's finally ready,the background is made completely from duplicates of the render and smudging work...

(it looks better on a darker background)

Here's the render:http://sneakybaron.com/albums/FTP_uploaded/Sensational_Spiderman_1.png

 

[DeletedUser]

nice amorphous purple blob you got yourself there
on a more caring note i can tell that you were completely tunnel visioned, try to avoid that

 

[DeletedUser]

It's a bit plain, but...

 

[DeletedUser]

nice amorphous purple blob you got yourself there
on a more caring note i can tell that you were completely tunnel visioned, try to avoid that

Thanks and I was what?:icon_confused:

 

[DeletedUser]

Made zis from a tutorial again

 

[DeletedUser]

@Law A little more blue would do well in this sig. Most of it is monotone at the moment.Other than that I quite like it.

@harb The focal point is way too big for this sig, it takes up most of it. You need to incorporate more of a person if you're going to get into the higher levels of sig making. Right now it has what we call "Floating Head syndrome".

@Nubz The tutorial maker is making you do stuff which isn't exactly right again Beckie. The clipping mask squares on the left side break up the flow and the colours of the render and the rest of the sig don't work well together.

 

[DeletedUser]

@Nubz The tutorial maker is making you do stuff which isn't exactly right again Beckie. The clipping mask squares on the left side break up the flow and the colours of the render and the rest of the sig don't work well together.

I disagree on both counts >< but thanks

 

[DeletedUser]

Well then you would be wrong those bars ruin the signature ...

 

[DeletedUser]

I posted this to Nubz on skype but I thought I may as well post it here as well, someone else may find it useful:

The main objective to flow is to lead the viewers eye into the sig, through the most important aspects of it, and then out again. Currently in your sig, we can see a clear upwards and outwards trend, which would generally work just fine, but the presence of the clipping mask boxes stops the viewers eyes from naturally flowing upwards and out of the sig. Our eyes automatically stop at these points. Breaking the flow can be used well, but it hasn't been here. You see, breaking flow creates conflict within the sig, and the eye is drawn to this because it is different. But, in your sig, the conflict is created in a fairly irrelevant part of the sig, away from the focal. So they would do well being replaced with something else.

 

[DeletedUser]

So this is better?

 

[DeletedUser]

much better



Critique please? First tag in a while

V2

 

[DeletedUser]

Better Add some text ?

 

[DeletedUser]

Think I might, some naughty glowing red or cyan might do the trick.

 

[DeletedUser81336]

*rips RSI's sig*

 

[DeletedUser]

*Rips Oscar*

 

[DeletedUser]

.

 

[DeletedUser95815]

Awesome as always. Funny, just been looking through your showroom)
Maybe add a bit more blending.

 

[DeletedUser]

Anyone have any ideas for improvement? It needs something more, but I can't think of what.

 

[DeletedUser]

As you can probably guess, I'm new to Graphics
I made this piece using a tut..
[spoil]

[/spoil]
Any CnC?