Dear SL, stop supporting robac, thanks

[DeletedUser]

ROFL!

I dont think TW really care about how many friends they have. What amuses me, is that so many of you didnt see it coming. Since their arrival, TW have been systematically taking down tribe after tribe after tribe. PANTS, for example. hardly anyone stood by the enemies of TW, in the hope that TW would keep their NAP/ally status with them - self preservation. TW used their allies and NAPS as stepping stones, and when they had served their purpose and TW had outgrown them, they attacked and dismantled them.
Had SL not supported RoBac, TW would still ultimately have targetted them at some point.. Now, most of the big tribes have gone, and there is no one for RoBac to turn to for help. The support SL are offering will only go so far, and looking at the maths TW has enough to take down most of SL and RoBac at the same time any way. Plenty of tribes have come on here and asked the other tribes to unite against TW, with the warnings that they could be next, and no one did anything. On the plus side, there are less of them on the rim...

 

[DeletedUser1023]

ROFL!

I dont think TW really care about how many friends they have. What amuses me, is that so many of you didnt see it coming. Since their arrival, TW have been systematically taking down tribe after tribe after tribe. PANTS, for example. hardly anyone stood by the enemies of TW, in the hope that TW would keep their NAP/ally status with them - self preservation. TW used their allies and NAPS as stepping stones, and when they had served their purpose and TW had outgrown them, they attacked and dismantled them.
Had SL not supported RoBac, TW would still ultimately have targetted them at some point.. Now, most of the big tribes have gone, and there is no one for RoBac to turn to for help. The support SL are offering will only go so far, and looking at the maths TW has enough to take down most of SL and RoBac at the same time any way. Plenty of tribes have come on here and asked the other tribes to unite against TW, with the warnings that they could be next, and no one did anything. On the plus side, there are less of them on the rim...

yeah.. we've definitely abandoned true allies like briton and hot

oh wait..

 

[DeletedUser1054]

whoops

 

[DeletedUser]

yeah.. we've definitely abandoned true allies like briton and hot

oh wait..

Yea, we have obviously treated all our allies the same way. Its not like [L] and co. didn't clandestinely support our enemies behind our backs.

Paladins were guilty of the same exact things as L, but they fixed the situation. I think you can see how their good decision making has served them.

 

[DeletedUser1205]

Simple steps in maintaining an alliance with TW

1.) Support TW members when they request it
2.) Kick fugitives from TW if you accidentally allow them into your tribe
3.) Support TW in it's wars.
4.) Do not support TW's enemies.
5.) Be proud of your TW alliance and anounce our solidarity to the world.
6.) Be nice and kind to your TW neighbors.



Is that really so much to ask?

 

[DeletedUser1264]

So folks, this is TW's new rules on diplomacy, if TW attacks your allies you are not allowed to support them without becoming the next war target

Umm... you might want to use that cute little 'wall of graffiti' analogy on yourself. Here's why what you said is a legitimate, acceptable, and honorable diplomatic guideline:

-TW and X tribe are allied
-TW declares war on Y tribe
-X supports Y tribe while TW attacks Y tribe

Next logical step?

-TW drops alliance (and possibly declares war on) C tribe

I don't know why that's so hard to understand.

 

[DeletedUser]

Umm... you might want to use that cute little 'wall of graffiti' analogy on yourself. Here's why what you said is a legitimate, acceptable, and honorable diplomatic guideline:

-TW and X tribe are allied
-TW declares war on Y tribe
-X supports Y tribe whil TW attacks Y tribe

Next logical step?

-TW drops alliance (and possibly declares war on) Y tribe

I don't know why that's so hard to understand.

I think you have your Xs and Ys crossed. :-D

 

[fairplay]

ROFL!

I dont think TW really care about how many friends they have. What amuses me, is that so many of you didnt see it coming. Since their arrival, TW have been systematically taking down tribe after tribe after tribe. PANTS, for example. hardly anyone stood by the enemies of TW, in the hope that TW would keep their NAP/ally status with them - self preservation. TW used their allies and NAPS as stepping stones, and when they had served their purpose and TW had outgrown them, they attacked and dismantled them.
Had SL not supported RoBac, TW would still ultimately have targetted them at some point.. Now, most of the big tribes have gone, and there is no one for RoBac to turn to for help. The support SL are offering will only go so far, and looking at the maths TW has enough to take down most of SL and RoBac at the same time any way. Plenty of tribes have come on here and asked the other tribes to unite against TW, with the warnings that they could be next, and no one did anything. On the plus side, there are less of them on the rim...

your a few months behind the news mate, but its true enough, excepyt they have'nt done any real damage to SL

 

[fairplay]

yeah.. we've definitely abandoned true allies like briton and hot

oh wait..

No but you disrespect them regularly, as you do all your allies, and you will find out soon how bad a move that is.

 

[fairplay]

Yea, we have obviously treated all our allies the same way. Its not like [L] and co. didn't clandestinely support our enemies behind our backs.

Paladins were guilty of the same exact things as L, but they fixed the situation. I think you can see how their good decision making has served them.

Maybe L did that, maybe paladins did that as well, SL never did that while we were allied and now you are complaining that we support our allies against you, that is pure TW hypocrisy.

 

[DeletedUser]

ROFL!

I dont think TW really care about how many friends they have. What amuses me, is that so many of you didnt see it coming. Since their arrival, TW have been systematically taking down tribe after tribe after tribe. PANTS, for example. hardly anyone stood by the enemies of TW, in the hope that TW would keep their NAP/ally status with them - self preservation. TW used their allies and NAPS as stepping stones, and when they had served their purpose and TW had outgrown them, they attacked and dismantled them.
Had SL not supported RoBac, TW would still ultimately have targetted them at some point.. Now, most of the big tribes have gone, and there is no one for RoBac to turn to for help. The support SL are offering will only go so far, and looking at the maths TW has enough to take down most of SL and RoBac at the same time any way. Plenty of tribes have come on here and asked the other tribes to unite against TW, with the warnings that they could be next, and no one did anything. On the plus side, there are less of them on the rim...

^^ Very true. It seems like they manipulate there allies in a way that only benefits them and looking by some of the crap in here if you ain't helping us your against us or something like that. Well done for consuming briton and hot. It looks like they couldn't make it in world 1 by themselves when a merge happens..

 

[DeletedUser]

seems a certain question still goes unanswered too.:icon_neutral:

 

[fairplay]

Simple steps in maintaining an alliance with TW

1.) Support TW members when they request it
2.) Kick fugitives from TW if you accidentally allow them into your tribe
3.) Support TW in it's wars.
4.) Do not support TW's enemies.
5.) Be proud of your TW alliance and anounce our solidarity to the world.
6.) Be nice and kind to your TW neighbors.



Is that really so much to ask?

1.) We always supported TW, except in actions involving allies, after all it was TW that used the neutral card on us.
2.) We used to kick fugitives from SL,
3.) As long as it wasn't against our allies, only following TWs example again
4.) Never, even when they were allied to us, (while TW were allied to us of course.
5.) Yeah, we did that as well.
6.) Thats not always as easy sad as done, especially when those TW members are obnoxious, arrogant self ilportant idiots, but we tried our best.


Its not too much to ask, its the do as I say not as I do that is the problem, you say we need to do that but don't do it yourselves and even if we do it you still turn around with more excuses as to why to drop the alliance, lets face it, you do what you want and respect nothing or no one.

 

[fairplay]

Umm... you might want to use that cute little 'wall of graffiti' analogy on yourself. Here's why what you said is a legitimate, acceptable, and honorable diplomatic guideline:

-TW and X tribe are allied
-TW declares war on Y tribe
-X supports Y tribe whil TW attacks Y tribe

Next logical step?

-TW drops alliance (and possibly declares war on) Y tribe

I don't know why that's so hard to understand.

You really don't have a clue do you.

Maybe try it like this;

TW drops alliance and attacks us.

They then do the same for 2 of our allies.

We are no longer allied to TW as they had already dropped our alliance so we are free to support our other allies against attacks.

Now run off and get some real facts before starting to make false accusations, and at least find out what we are talking about, thats not the excuse you are using for us, though it is one that has been overused so I understand how you got confused.

 

[DeletedUser]

TW's Nazi like arrogance (see other thread comparing this war to WWII) is what will lead TW to alienate every other tribe and be their ultimate downfall.

TW wil eventually fall.. just like any other tribe..

 

[DeletedUser]

I reckon some of there members on the forum fell or were dropped on there head when they were born. They babble a lot of nonsense and dodge any real questions.

 

[DeletedUser]

Yes TW will fall. When they get bored to death and quit.

 

[DeletedUser]

^^ Very true. It seems like they manipulate there allies in a way that only benefits them and looking by some of the crap in here if you ain't helping us your against us or something like that. Well done for consuming briton and hot. It looks like they couldn't make it in world 1 by themselves when a merge happens..

What purpose does an alliance have if not advantage for both parties involved? You scratch our back and we scratch yours. That's how alliances work. Not "we'll stay under your blanket of protection but when you attack this enemy village you'll be wiped out by my swords because we're allies with them too."

If you're handing out "alliances" just to avoid being attacked, then you don't understand what an alliance is. Working together for mutual advantage. You don't work, you don't play. It's that simple.

 

[fairplay]

What purpose does an alliance have if not advantage for both parties involved? You scratch our back and we scratch yours. That's how alliances work. Not "we'll stay under your blanket of protection but when you attack this enemy village you'll be wiped out by my swords because we're allies with them too."

If you're handing out "alliances" just to avoid being attacked, then you don't understand what an alliance is. Working together for mutual advantage. You don't work, you don't play. It's that simple.

Go back and read the thread before trying to tell people what they are talking about, this thread is about SL, SL has never supported one ally against another. SL honours its alliances because unlike you SL is an honourable tribe, I think there we strike the real difference.

TW don't want us to support our allies against them when they are no longer our allies due to their own decision, you made your bed now lie in it and quit complaining like a bunch of school children all the time.

 

[DeletedUser]

Maybe L did that, maybe paladins did that as well, SL never did that while we were allied and now you are complaining that we support our allies against you, that is pure TW hypocrisy.

No, the facts regardling SL is that we we allied for months and fought many wars in that time. But, the first one involving TW that you contribute to is one where you are against us. Now thats a valuable ally.