Caveman 10345
Guest
nice declaration.. I vote for XVI though.. lol!!!
But your in Active :icon_confused:
Last edited by a moderator:
nice declaration.. I vote for XVI though.. lol!!!
As amusing as this is,.
Active/Ni attacked us, without declaring war BTW, well over 10 days ago, not yesterday. Nice revisionism, Active!
The lovely graph dysentary posted has been vigorously massaged until it too is . Anyone who wants to get a true picture of how the war has gone for Active needs to do the following:
1) Place XVI and LFAH on one side (we prefer Side 1)
2) Place Active and Ni on the other side.
3) To Side 2, add the following:
- The tribe H-R, allies of Active's who have attacked us and are being dealt with
- The players noobish idiot, deiity, and ghostjapan. These are all players who were in Active when they attacked us but have been knocked out and booted from their tribe since. Their vills are now mostly ours, and they are war casualties, despite their erstwhile tribemates trying to sweep them under the rug.
- Unfortunately, the player King Jude has deleted and his lost vills won't show up in the chart. He too was in Active when they attacked us and his vills were lost to us. Maybe add in 30-40 kills to our side to account for us knocking him out (he had more vills but I'd guess that's what we took before he deleted).
4) Then set the time period to "Last Month," as it has been over a week since Active attacked us.
5) Notice that the actual net loss for Active is around 250 vills. Add in another 35 or so for King Jude's demise and they're down almost 300 vills. Not very close.
6) But, yes, if you drop off all the players from your tribe who've been getting their butts kicked, you can pretend that you're only 54 vills down, instead of the correct count of almost 300.
Reply away. I likely won't see them as I rarely waste my time in here. Someone pointed this thread out so I took a look, discovered the misinformation, and thought I'd at least attempt to correct it.
Have a nice day!![]()
You can put it how you want, noobish idiot quit, you can keep every village of his, we won't care. DEiity has quit, take him as well! Add them to the stats if you want, we'll add all the tribe less players we eat as well eh? King jude joined and went inactive, as soon as we kicked him he continued to lose villages. That is our fault, of course. Add to the stats if you wish, we don't mind your pathetic attempts at making the stats look bad.
War caps are war caps, inactive or whatever XVI is smart for taking them because they used to be Active villages and now they're XVI villages. IT happens in every war, people conveniently "quit" because of excuse like their dog at their laptop or theyre recycling their sandals when in reality they're quitting because they have incomings. It's all too convenient, so get over yourself Active and all of you quit again.
There goes Active again making excuses. New members, new excuses. You aren't beating 100+, you need to include all the Active accounts to make it accurate. Regardless if they quit, they're still in your K's and were your accounts. If they were quitting why weren't they internalled? XVI is basicly gaining those accounts so that's smart on their part. Why wouldn't they noble easy targets? Make some more excuses, I'm sure pain.carbon is losing villages because someone blew up his computer
Well if you were a part of this world and not trolling wou would know that pretty much all of the original Active (the ones who mattered anyway) all quit months ago. Then had new account owners of some original Active accounts to reform Active, which is why I said "Active Quit Again". Regardless if they knew or not or whatever, they were Active Accounts that are getting eaten by XVI, not Active. So XVI is getting a lot bigger while Active is getting a lot smaller. So go back to W46 Googly...ps...you know me.
I even hear Gosid has an account, Danny....
Care to elaborate on this one?
I've suspected, But was never sure.
I think enough finger pointing and more proof please. If you're going to make a statement, back it up. At least it 'might' reduce the bickering just a tad. This is now reminding me of a schoolyard fight.
I think enough finger pointing and more proof please. If you're going to make a statement, back it up. At least it 'might' reduce the bickering just a tad. This is now reminding me of a schoolyard fight.