Don't attack old NH-player, beware for DMK

DeletedUser

Guest
And a NAP tried to take advantage out of the situation, by attacking me with nobles. But the mods did arrange it by stopping his attacks, and by giving me a protection ban for some time, so my armies and everything can return.

Grtz
Beldin
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Beldin said:
And now:

dragos.ceaunas

keeps on attacking me, knowing that I don't have defences at this moment, since my sitter did send it all away.

This also shows how the ROME family acts towards other players....

Grtz
Beldin

--> Okay, that ROME player stops attacking. At least a player that has received some honour now :)
Click to expand...

What the hell are you talking about? Rome families have been in war with DMK for quite some time now.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
badass1o1 said:
From the rules:
"An account that is being sat has to be played for it's own benefit, not for the benefit of other accounts."
Where is this? cuz its not in the account sitting section
Click to expand...

i suggest you read all TW rules 10 times over.

§3) Account sitting


While a player is account sitting for another player, no interactions (attack/supply/support/co-ordinate attacks or support) are allowed between any accounts played on the account sitters internet connection (including friends, family and colleagues on the same connection). That includes all accounts, that are being account account sat by players on that connection.
All interactions are forbidden until 24 hours after the account sitting mode has been canceled.
An account that is being sat has to be played for it's own benefit, not for the benefit of other accounts.
Everything stated in §2 has to be followed.

Examples:

* It is not allowed to use an account in any way that profits another account on the same connection.
* It is forbidden to give away villages as presents from an account you are sitting (unless it is a trade of villages that clearly benefits both accounts).
* It is forbidden to play an account you are sitting just to push other accounts, even if the other accounts are on a different internet connection.
* It is forbidden to send suicide attacks from an account you are sitting to clean for other accounts (unless it is part of an agreement that does not put the account at a disadvantage)
* It is allowed for you to attack and conquer villages with the account you are account sitting.
* It is allowed for you to attack two players from the same tribe with your own account and the account you are account sitting for (i.e. separate attacks on separate players).
* You are not allowed to use information about any accounts you are sitting for attacks from your own account, or provide this to other players, even after the sitting has ended.


is this clear enough for you?
 

DeletedUser

Guest
He'll be perma banned in this world. :)

Beldin said:
And a NAP tried to take advantage out of the situation, by attacking me with nobles. But the mods did arrange it by stopping his attacks, and by giving me a protection ban for some time, so my armies and everything can return.

Grtz
Beldin
Click to expand...

TW Admin did that? I had an account sitter who suicided all my troops, and other than banning the account sitter, next to nothing was done. http://forum.tribalwars.net/showthread.php?t=20414
I complained vociferously to the useless TW admins about righting a wrong.
So, I am glad to see that some justice is done here, though a return of ALL of your troops would be appropriate.

Better luck out there Beldin :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top