DeletedUser
Guest
Keep following the world and you'll discover who possesses the most intelligence with their decisions.
It'd be one thing if I was a refugee who jumped ship with 20 incoming attacks.
It's another when I had no incomings (other than some random fake from SVG) and *STILL* have defensive support in some of my PHORCE friends' villages and am still in touch with the current dukes.
But believe what you want, it's not worth the argument. Analyze my statements and try and lower my status, it will have no effect on me as a player. This concept of "cred" is a tad ridiculous anyway. What makes a tribe "credible"? Just because a tribe has players capable of exciting PNPs or whom are amazing at photoshop does not make their tribe credible. A tribe's credibility should be based on its overall sense of loyalty, teamwork, coordination, and self-respect. Which, in a sense, could be used to deprecate the credibility of PHORCE, but I do not sense any lack of credibility within the walls of Prey. This tribe heavily emphasizes all four of those qualities and will not tolerate anything less than full-on cooperation amongst all its members.
One player does not bring down the credibility of a tribe just because he made a past mistake. He brings down the credibility of a tribe if he's a whiny b*tch or if he refuses to cooperate on key operations. I am neither of those. Argue all you want but anyone who agrees that one player, when there is no proof of in-game incompetence as a player or as a tribemate (I will admit you can connote my incompetence, perhaps, as a duke, because of one or two mistakes I've made...But when it comes down to the respect I garnered and the loyalty of those whom have followed me into Prey and even of some of those who stayed behind, I feel I have succeeded as a leader) then there is no reason to believe a single person can bring down the credibility of an entire tribe.
It'd be one thing if I was a refugee who jumped ship with 20 incoming attacks.
It's another when I had no incomings (other than some random fake from SVG) and *STILL* have defensive support in some of my PHORCE friends' villages and am still in touch with the current dukes.
But believe what you want, it's not worth the argument. Analyze my statements and try and lower my status, it will have no effect on me as a player. This concept of "cred" is a tad ridiculous anyway. What makes a tribe "credible"? Just because a tribe has players capable of exciting PNPs or whom are amazing at photoshop does not make their tribe credible. A tribe's credibility should be based on its overall sense of loyalty, teamwork, coordination, and self-respect. Which, in a sense, could be used to deprecate the credibility of PHORCE, but I do not sense any lack of credibility within the walls of Prey. This tribe heavily emphasizes all four of those qualities and will not tolerate anything less than full-on cooperation amongst all its members.
One player does not bring down the credibility of a tribe just because he made a past mistake. He brings down the credibility of a tribe if he's a whiny b*tch or if he refuses to cooperate on key operations. I am neither of those. Argue all you want but anyone who agrees that one player, when there is no proof of in-game incompetence as a player or as a tribemate (I will admit you can connote my incompetence, perhaps, as a duke, because of one or two mistakes I've made...But when it comes down to the respect I garnered and the loyalty of those whom have followed me into Prey and even of some of those who stayed behind, I feel I have succeeded as a leader) then there is no reason to believe a single person can bring down the credibility of an entire tribe.