OK, well right or wrong kong's reputation may have suffered a little by taking in Green, but it's undeniable that anyone would still be a fool to write them off, just like I have stated previously in threads.
And while on the topic, since I cbf answering the igm I'll answer here instead. Also, since the mail is in response to an assertion I made on the public forums, it's probably only fair that I clarify my publicly stated position (that's assuming anyone actually gives a toss lol "
):
Cieutat on 06.09. at 00:51
As you stated I had no clue....I am curious as to your view on Kong presently. As you have stated I am a complete fool with no understanding. I was wondering if you would educate me.
I'm sure you are not a fool with no understanding, but like it or not, you or anyone else who think Kong still can't do some serious damage is being silly and ignoring history that isn't as far in the past as many have implied in these forums.
Anyone who says dumb things will likely get flamed or be called an idiot and deserves to, whether that be you, me, or anyone else.
I hold no grudges against you, I was simply pointing out that it is a dumb thing to say that Kong could be discounted so easily, and quite frankly it's in your and others interests to realise that under-estimating an enemy like that is a very quick way to get yourself killed.
And atid don't be under any illusions, if Bong wanted to kill you, you'd be dead, no ifs, buts or maybes.
The thing that pisses me off is that a lot of the ppl that are saying Kong are n00bs etc in the pub forums wouldn't have the you know whats to have said anything a year ago when they were still the best tribe my a mile.
I'm not sucking up or anything, I just call it how I see it, good, bad, and everything else in between.