Feedback Game Updates

SwedishBlueCheese said:
this is good. please keep it so cats/etc keep same targets. Could it be able to make troop templates work on this? Example a button to make all escorts 100 lc 1 noble or some player choosed setting
Click to expand...

Not currently, the templates are fixed and actually hardly a template, more of a "type selection". Feel free to submit an improvement suggestion however :)
 
JawJaw said:
Not currently, the templates are fixed and actually hardly a template, more of a "type selection". Feel free to submit an improvement suggestion however :)
Click to expand...

There was a valid point being brought up, that actually when thinking more closley about is probably a BIG problem.

You can now basically time anti snipes very perfectly and split them up, over and over. Which makes this more difficult for a defender, like, alot more difficult.

Why is it not possible for the defender to snipe via this? If you have anti snipes you are STILL killing each snipe after the noble (hopefully) died, and if you have split your noble train you stand to lose every snipe anyway.

Make it fair, make support sniping availible. Can not be a big issue here
 
  • If you haven't added noble in first attack, please dont fill out nobles for the rest...
  • If you dont have any nobles in the village, dont fill out nobles in all the attacks...
  • Please allow us to edit the first attack while in confirmation window when using additional attacks feature...

Also would be nice if this new feature was purely fake-trains (which is what we asked for when extension was removed) and not allowed use for anti-sniping...
 
im not reading 27 pages of suggestions so if this has already been suggested sorry

the set up of it isnt as good as the actual IG train if it was like that it would be really nice and if we could choose different targets for cats per attack i would love that so first part of the fake train hit smithy second part hit HQ etc that would be nice aswell
 
I love the premise of the built-in train feature.

There is a much-needed tweak to get it to be user-friendly. This feedback I feel is essential for it to be properly functional.

When the first attack is set up, can ALL units that go at a slower speed be greyed out and become unusable in the train? This will avoid solo nobles accidentally following a ram speed attack and inevitably dying because of the big landing gap.

There's no real benefit strategically to leaving it as it currently is, but this would be much better for less experienced users who are more inclined to lose key troops because of the features setup.
 
Small feedback for the haul update:

Include the total looted resources in the pop up.
From:
7427164a3215f82903ef9196865dccf8.png

To include 80/80:
8995a45b26cd4d569bd4fd7cd3f5ea68.png
 
When looking at the tribe members troop count/buildings from the members screen, can we see all members listed in one go instead of selecting individually?
 
Inderpal S1ngh said:
When looking at the tribe members troop count/buildings from the members screen, can we see all members listed in one go instead of selecting individually?
Click to expand...

This feels like a suggestion. Feel free to add it here:

Ideas & Improvements

In this forum you can post your ideas for how the game can be improved! Please read this article for more information. Note that suggestions can be rejected at every stage.
forum.tribalwars.net forum.tribalwars.net
(but pls check if anyone else has already suggested this).
 
Is there going to be a "greater then/less then" fields away option as part of the Dynamic Groups - Distance to Coordinates update? It's not mentioned anywhere but I would suppose that's obvious that it will? Otherwise it's not gonna work that well imo.
 
One Last Shot... said:
Updated bracket limit and tab increase in the notebook - amazing!!! Great to see it implemented!
Click to expand...

The increased bracket limit has been LONG overdue. The extra notebook pages are definitely nice, but the bracket limit was unreasonably low.
 
I definitely appreciate the community suggestions being implemented, but it really feels like they aren't implemented enough, there's like 10+ pages of to submit approved suggestions
 
- Mr. President said:
I definitely appreciate the community suggestions being implemented, but it really feels like they aren't implemented enough, there's like 10+ pages of to submit approved suggestions
Click to expand...

Not all suggestions that are submitted would get implemented - just considered by the developers.

That said, there have been 10 user suggestions implemented since Nov 15th. Which is quite a lot!
 
- Mr. President said:
I definitely appreciate the community suggestions being implemented, but it really feels like they aren't implemented enough, there's like 10+ pages of to submit approved suggestions
Click to expand...

Edit: Okay, so there is not gonna be an option for that now that I checked. Could this be implemented somehow? Feels like it would make it much better and flexible for what it's supposed to be used for:
https://imgur.com/xXKUUmQ
 
Yea, it should make it so much easier to define different areas and borders, instead of just having to rely on only "fields from". Should be a nobrainer.

I hope/think that's an easy fix for the devs and should be added directly, since almost all of the other group options already use it. It's always a bit of a hassle making border groups and I was excited seeing this being added to make that easier, but I'm half as excited right now. This is gonna help, but only like 50 % atm. Pls add it! :)
 
i disagree heavily with removal of steam and browser instances running at same time.
Coplayers overlap and completely removes ability to catch up with eachother and plan in synergy especially when it comes to these big late games wars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top