I meant we would assist PTT in their conflict against FTR. Sorry if I was not clear.
FTR haven't exactly tried to avoid a conflict with Hatred. You surely couldnt expect we would stay peaceful for ever if you attack our allies, you lie to us, you take on our enemies, you threaten us, etc etc.
Anyway, one side is not going to win overnight. Im sure this will be a fun and interesting conflict.
who allowed their name to be posted by a tribe as part of an anti-ftr alliance?
I thinks its reasonable to argue you were lying the whole way. That, or you obviously do not care how your name is used.
Your position of supporting your 'allies' PTT shows that when an anti-FTR coalition was named outright by AoS you WERE in support of it. You thus lied when you said you would honour the FTR NAP. Otherwise, you wouldnt be supporting an ally who took your name in the vain of a misguided war, you would be punishing them for their misdemeanour wouldnt you?
If you had taken a CE neutrality stance, it would have been unclear you were against FTR from the start
So, by supporting PTT against FTR you make your earlier position clear. Your NAP with us was false and diplomatic relations with your tribe are also false and cannot be trusted.
It seems hatred join PTT on the dishourable list while TFA and CE retain their honour even though neither has supported FTR in anyway.
Thus i now actually find it a shame that the tribe most likely to be wiped out in this war, TFA are likely to be the ones fighting for a real reason that is defendable. Shame really...