DeletedUser
Guest
Im just surprised censor has not tried to recruit shika yet :lol:
Im just surprised censor has not tried to recruit shika yet :lol:
Why would we recruit a player we've all but completely wiped out? I think you need to recheck your recruitment strategy.
i think you need to check your recruitment. Seeing how you have near full member limit, and you recruit very poor players. i would not put it past you to recruit him, heck, im surprised you have not recruited everything with more then a village :lol:
And Havok let you join, so I'd say our standards of recruitment can't be any worse
i think you need to check your recruitment. Seeing how you have near full member limit, and you recruit very poor players. i would not put it past you to recruit him, heck, im surprised you have not recruited everything with more then a village :lol:
I would...
well that member was part of our tribe and inactive or not that member contributed to the tribe - if with nothing else, just village counts and points. So, if I had him early I would have him later as well.
I see no need for booting him.
thats one of the "smartest" things ive ever heard. if he was simply in the tribe for show and PANICKED (which seems to be the case) after a couple hundred fakes and losing 1-2 villages...then he was a worthless player to begin with.if your running an aggressive tribe,you expect your guys to be aggressive and experienced and not buckle under the pressure.leaving the player in your tribe to rot and give away all his villages unprotected (not fighting back etc) is by for more idiotic than booting him atleast to save the stats that he would otherwise ruin
quoted for truth. It seems that East's old problems of having players quit when under attack has come back to haunt them
[/spoil]Side 1:
Tribes: Impact
Side 2:
Tribes: CENSOR
Timeframe: Last 48 hours
Total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 30
Side 2: 2
Difference: 28
Points value of total conquers against opposite side:
Side 1: 276,856
Side 2: 19,703
Difference: 257,153