DeletedUser
Guest
Opinions on it for this world?
(not right away but like once you get a handful of villages)
(not right away but like once you get a handful of villages)
I was referring to the offensive HC build
In the early game, it's always better to have sp/sw/hc if at all possible.I am a fan of SP/HC for defense... builds faster and travels faster, although it's not quite as strong as a SP/SW/HC build. I think the pros make up for the cons of it though.
In the early game, it's always better to have sp/sw/hc if at all possible.
actually I use HC for noble villages, why? because they will send some offense with my nobles and defense when my nobles take the village, as to this world to be honest replacing the LC with HC is a personal choice, since it is slightly pricier, but you have the added effect of having defense also with your nukes.
As me pirate bucco said! HC strategy shines in tech worlds, since ye can uniform yer researches n' yer able ta have lv3 D troops in all vills. With simple tech settings, it'd be bettarrr ta just stick with the classical way o' things n' use HC in D builds strictly
I can see why you would make HC noble trains but I think that if you are really worried that the village will be recapped then it is probably best to just time support behind the train. IMO that is more efficient than HC trains. It also means that if they do recap you still have a train to try again with where as with an HC train the HC would have died in the recap and you are left with 3 nobles with out any troops to send them with.actually I use HC for noble villages, why? because they will send some offense with my nobles and defense when my nobles take the village, as to this world to be honest replacing the LC with HC is a personal choice, since it is slightly pricier, but you have the added effect of having defense also with your nukes.