theoneandonly
Guest
Not true
satorbg
Guest
Sounds like he got what's coming to him. I really think that arrogance and TW don't mix well. Also alcohol and TW. Anyone remember MCD vs. Turtles (ran by Thargoran) on W11? Man did MCD have arrogance aplenty. That was an ODD feast for the eyes, as well as the PnP...
DeletedUser13939
Guest
I vaguely remember that. I feel so old. ;-;
Spectors Ark
Guest
Nice Interview Rose. thank you
Rose.
Guest
Hmm....how much is "a lot"?Not true
Exactly....you can't tell me that is not true since "a lot" is not clearly defined. To me...that can mean as little as 2 leaders...or as much as 30.
Also my identity has not been revealed and will not be revealed. I want my audience to think I always write from the most non-bias point of view which I try to do.
-Delete-
Guest
A lot is most definitely not 2
Frozen Flaim
Guest
Well there's already 3 leaders of top 5 tribes from w22 that are currently leading here, and considering w22 was renowned for it's above average ammount of good players and wars, that's probably somthing worth noting.
I have also counted another 4 leaders here that had leadership roles in good tribes earlier than w22, so that's 7 already, and i'd be very suprised if there weren't a few more hiding under alias' that i'm yet to discover.
I have also counted another 4 leaders here that had leadership roles in good tribes earlier than w22, so that's 7 already, and i'd be very suprised if there weren't a few more hiding under alias' that i'm yet to discover.
bengaltiger
Guest
actually it depends of what is new.Not true
i didnt find any single digit top 10 tribes leader here.
Frozen Flaim
Guest
There are 2, although neither are leading tribes and i believe both are PP whoring for 77.actually it depends of what is new.
i didnt find any single digit top 10 tribes leader here.
Last edited:
Rose.
Guest
Agree about the new thing.actually it depends of what is new.
i didnt find any single digit top 10 tribes leader here.
@ - Delete- A lot for me is 2....because I only talk about so few tribes. So a lot...for me...can actually be 2 just because I only talk about 7 or so tribes.
Continuing..."a lot" can also be one depending on the individual or the number in one's sample size. Don't say it definitely isn't two. A very ignorant comment.
Rose.
Guest
Who are the three?Well there's already 3 leaders of top 5 tribes from w22 that are currently leading here, and considering w22 was renowned for it's above average ammount of good players and wars, that's probably somthing worth noting.
I have also counted another 4 leaders here that had leadership roles in good tribes earlier than w22, so that's 7 already, and i'd be very suprised if there weren't a few more hiding under alias' that i'm yet to discover.
Frozen Flaim
Guest
The 2 mentioned in your interview, and myself.Who are the three?
Rose.
Guest
That's two then.The 2 mentioned in your interview, and myself.
nikug leads a top 10 tribe (If you combine Lif3 and D3TH)
Frozen Flaim
Guest
No, i said the tribes the 3 lead (Bunny, RBE and EXP) were top 5 on w22 (at some stage) and now they are leading tribes of varying sizes here, myself being the smallest after starting 8 days late.That's two then.
nikug leads a top 10 tribe (If you combine Lif3 and D3TH)
Spectors Ark
Guest
I have played and Duked tribes since world 6 does that count?
bengaltiger
Guest
if any of those tribes ever reached tot 10 its count.I have played and Duked tribes since world 6 does that count?
Spectors Ark
Guest
I was a member of [BA] that later turned into BURO in world 17. I quit the game in 2010 before BURO won the world because I traveled south America when I left I was 6 mil.
No I was not the Duke of this tribe so maybe not.
No I was not the Duke of this tribe so maybe not.
-Delete-
Guest
No a lot is not 1 or 2 is the context you're using it, 2 million would be considered a lot, 2 hours even in certain circumstances, 2 people would not be considered a lot in ANY circumstance, the ignorance is coming from you.Agree about the new thing.
@ - Delete- A lot for me is 2....because I only talk about so few tribes. So a lot...for me...can actually be 2 just because I only talk about 7 or so tribes.
Continuing..."a lot" can also be one depending on the individual or the number in one's sample size. Don't say it definitely isn't two. A very ignorant comment.
Rose.
Guest
Didn't catch that...my badNo, i said the tribes the 3 lead (Bunny, RBE and EXP) were top 5 on w22 (at some stage) and now they are leading tribes of varying sizes here, myself being the smallest after starting 8 days late.
Trust me...I make a living out of this....."a lot" is a relative term and thus is defined by the individual who used it...there is no universal number for any such situation.No a lot is not 1 or 2 is the context you're using it, 2 million would be considered a lot, 2 hours even in certain circumstances, 2 people would not be considered a lot in ANY circumstance, the ignorance is coming from you.
Your ignorance is recognized..and I would love to be on the lookout for more ignorant statements from you.
Love,
Rose.
Snipe This
Guest
2 out of 3 is a lot...
Rose 1, -delete- 0
Rose 1, -delete- 0