Interview with Rose 1st Edition

-Delete-

Guest
you are stalling my retirement haha...

Typically when a child cannot find a proper way or means to respond he/she resorts to name calling. My approximation is that you are either in 3rd grade or 4th judging by your ability to spell elephant...Am I right? Or am I right?
Please point our where i misspelled elephant

Me pain? course not :D ok so say i drank 20 bowls of blood in a year would that be considered as a lot seeing as normal people do not drink blood? as i think most people would say that would be alot...

For example : My children like to drink weak tea with lots of milk and sugar in it.

Now the amount of milk that you add to a tea is actually a very little amount but can still be considered alot regardless...
Yes that would be a lot of blood and very weird

Alot is not a word :p

Having a little or a lot of milk in a cup of tea would be considered relative yes, please point out where i said it wouldn't, the whole argument is Rose said 2 people leading tribes on this world that did on w22 is a lot, which it isn't, its really pretty straight forward
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser111495

Guest
Having a little or a lot of milk in a cup of tea would be considered relative yes, please point out where i said it wouldn't, the whole argument is Rose said 2 people leading tribes on this world that did on w22 is a lot, which it isn't, its really pretty straight forward
Again i have to disagree, if you had 3 apples and ate 2 then you ate most the apples you have yes but 3 apples is not a lot to begin with, its just 3 apples.
Well if you are someone that does not usually eat fruit then eating 2 or 3 apples would be considered a lot would it not? if we are being relative... but according to your post its not...
 

-Delete-

Guest
If you dont eat fruit your not suddenly going to have a craving for 3 apples, just like nobody is going to eat 3 horses

And again the argument is 2 leaders from w22 are leading on w76, this is not a lot, im not going to argue every single possible relevance of the word a lot as its pointless
 

DeletedUser111495

Guest
If you dont eat fruit your not suddenly going to have a craving for 3 apples
Well thats weird as i dont eat fruit really and i had 4 bananas earlier.... wont know if you dont try...

But yes this has nothing to do with this thread, i just was not going to back down...
 

Rose.

Guest
Please point our where i misspelled elephant



Yes that would be a lot of blood and very weird

Alot is not a word :p

Having a little or a lot of milk in a cup of tea would be considered relative yes, please point out where i said it wouldn't, the whole argument is Rose said 2 people leading tribes on this world that did on w22 is a lot, which it isn't, its really pretty straight forward
I said judging by your ability to spell elephant....not inability.


I also never said 2 people leading tribes on this world that did on w22 is a lot...I said there were not a lot of leaders from old worlds leading in w76 from my interview with balubhai...you are confused.
 

-Delete-

Guest
Ok fair enough you didnt word it how i said you did, this stupid debate has been going on so long i phrased it wrong, however

Exactly....you can't tell me that is not true since "a lot" is not clearly defined. To me...that can mean as little as 2 leaders...or as much as 30.


To which i said 2 is not a lot and seeing how you actually said as little as, im really not sure how you can argue im wrong
 

Frozen Flaim

Guest
You guys are still going with this? Wow, i thought i was stubborn.

But just for the record, rose is correct. A lot is completely relative depending on the situation. For example, i live somewhere where it very rarely snows. Before last winter it had been 9 years since the last decent snowfall. (It would usually snow for a few days, but never settle)

So last winter, i don't think a day went by when i didn't hear "wow, it's snowing a lot this year" when in reality we actually had less than half an inch, and when my friend came over from Canada, he had a right laugh because he had never seen snowfall so light in his entire life.

Wow, that was the most irrelevent post i think i have ever made here, but this argument was begginning to get stupid.
 

-Delete-

Guest
You guys are still going with this? Wow, i thought i was stubborn.

But just for the record, rose is correct. A lot is completely relative depending on the situation. For example, i live somewhere where it very rarely snows. Before last winter it had been 9 years since the last decent snowfall. (It would usually snow for a few days, but never settle)

So last winter, i don't think a day went by when i didn't hear "wow, it's snowing a lot this year" when in reality we actually had less than half an inch, and when my friend came over from Canada, he had a right laugh because he had never seen snowfall so light in his entire life.

Wow, that was the most irrelevent post i think i have ever made here, but this argument was begginning to get stupid.
To me...that can mean as little as 2 leaders...or as much as 30.

A lot in this situation cannot be 2, simple. I havent spent the past 2 days saying a lot is not relative in any situation, learn to read.
 

Frozen Flaim

Guest
It's 3 anyway, not 2. And 3 out of the top 5 is quite alot. :icon_wink:

Haha, i couldn't resist.