DeletedUser
Guest
Rose.: Likewise actually. A lot of the leaders now are from newer worlds only.
Not true
Rose.: Likewise actually. A lot of the leaders now are from newer worlds only.
Not true
Not true
actually it depends of what is new.
i didnt find any single digit top 10 tribes leader here.
actually it depends of what is new.
i didnt find any single digit top 10 tribes leader here.
Well there's already 3 leaders of top 5 tribes from w22 that are currently leading here, and considering w22 was renowned for it's above average ammount of good players and wars, that's probably somthing worth noting.
I have also counted another 4 leaders here that had leadership roles in good tribes earlier than w22, so that's 7 already, and i'd be very suprised if there weren't a few more hiding under alias' that i'm yet to discover.
Who are the three?
The 2 mentioned in your interview, and myself.
That's two then.
nikug leads a top 10 tribe (If you combine Lif3 and D3TH)
I have played and Duked tribes since world 6 does that count?
Agree about the new thing.
@ - Delete- A lot for me is 2....because I only talk about so few tribes. So a lot...for me...can actually be 2 just because I only talk about 7 or so tribes.
Continuing..."a lot" can also be one depending on the individual or the number in one's sample size. Don't say it definitely isn't two. A very ignorant comment.
No, i said the tribes the 3 lead (Bunny, RBE and EXP) were top 5 on w22 (at some stage) and now they are leading tribes of varying sizes here, myself being the smallest after starting 8 days late.
No a lot is not 1 or 2 is the context you're using it, 2 million would be considered a lot, 2 hours even in certain circumstances, 2 people would not be considered a lot in ANY circumstance, the ignorance is coming from you.