DeletedUser
Guest
is it me or is the davoe suigen vs. aod war ironic? on one side we have davoe, with their tribe description about lifes magical journey and happy whatnot, and suigens lectures about loyalty and truth and justice and whatever, and on the other side we have the angels of death.. a name that says it all (damn metalheads). it seems odd that tribes that put forth different PUBLIC images always find themselves fighting. look at ng and rel even, rel puts forth this image of being well, relentlessly aggressive, and not caring about others thoughts and opinions, (this takes only into accoutn public image, i really dont care what the tribes really like, im judging by actions in game and public profile), then we have ng, whos public profile specifys friendly yet aggressive, and where you and i may know ng is quite a relentless force, and has similar strategies to rel, ng's public image, the way they want new potential recruits to see them is friendly and professional. so on one side we have ng= aggressive but friendly and fun to hang out with, and rel on the other side= total hardcore badass nobling machines with no reguard for the opinions of the human race, and yet with time tensions arose between the two tribes. that may not be a very obvious example but its definately the most well known. another example is the age old tio uniro war, tio believed in small well coordinated tribes, and uniro believed in quantity over quality, to sprawl across a continent as well as they can and as quickly no matter what they had to do. i guess my point it alot of wars are ironic, at any point in time you can easily spot tribes that are bound to go to war at some time in the top 40 simply off their profile and location.
