ISN vs Panda , Sarcow recent 1 week war stat

DeletedUser118874

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: ISN
Side 2:
Tribes: Panda, SARCOW

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 34
Side 2: 48
Difference: 14

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 9
Side 2: 3
Difference: 6

chart


Points value of total conquers:

Side 1: 80,382
Side 2: 128,262
Difference: 47,880

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 34,388
Side 2: 9,407
Difference: 24,981

chart
 

DeletedUser118874

Guest
Last 3 months


Side 1:
Tribes: ISN
Side 2:
Tribes: Panda, SARCOW

Timeframe: Last 3 months

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 25
Side 2: 14
Difference: 11

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 78,928
Side 2: 43,942
Difference: 34,986

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
How have the K54 rankings changed? Conquer stats are one thing, but the impact on general growth is important too
 

DeletedUser118874

Guest
Lifelessclown's main got nobled by dopa in the deepest core of sarcow,panda.
Terrible thing:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
Unless you have been monitoring it, you can't, as far as I know.

Just so we can check in future, rankings (currently) are:


RankTribe namePointsVillages
1 ISN473.713141
2 Panda318.36081
3 SARCOW282.15884
 

DeletedUser118888

Guest
As i said before this war started, Sarcow is a joke, Panda will be a formidable foe and that's exactly how it's been working out. With Panda things are tense, Sarcow just keeps stacking their leaderships/leaders friends villages and let rest fall. And mysteriously a lot of people leave the tribe before we noble them.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
in order to win a war, one needs war caps.
in short that means; noble red dots on your map, not brown, and definitely not gray.
seems a no brainer to me, but some peeps simply do not understand
 

Triple Threat

Guest
while ISN are taking war stats it seems panda and sarcow havent received that memo
 

atmospherecf

Guest
Pretty nice war. ISN looks strong. Good luck to both sides.
 

DeletedUser107658

Guest
As i said before this war started, Sarcow is a joke, Panda will be a formidable foe and that's exactly how it's been working out. With Panda things are tense, Sarcow just keeps stacking their leaderships/leaders friends villages and let rest fall. And mysteriously a lot of people leave the tribe before we noble them.

Please do show your evidence of me being stacked at any point? Since when is requesting support for members of the tribe suddenly a bad thing and now you're generalizing them as my friends? The majority of my herd are my friends. We don't "let" any fall, you pick off the segregated and pick off the quiet ones who do not speak up when they are being attacked or in need of any help, 75% of your conquers are in the north, I'm waiting for your impressive push towards our cluster.

The last point we have already discussed via mail, don't try to tint us with your tribes dirty doing.

Also; I think it would only be fair that you include your allies, bashers -U- and your shields TDD!! into the statistics seeing as you're co-ordinating with them offensively and defensively, whether they're too afraid to actually join the war or not is their own choice, you are all red on the map anyhow. :lol:

But anyway:

Side 1:
Tribes: SARCOW, Panda
Side 2:
Tribes: - U -, ISN, TDD!!


Timeframe: Last week


Total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 10
Side 2: 9
Difference: 1


chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 33,625
Side 2: 30,236
Difference: 3,389


chart
 

Forgotten

Contributing Poster
Reaction score
199
What i see in this war appears to be 3 tribes against two tribes ,allies fighting for each other the way it suppose to be .
 

Triple Threat

Guest
thanks lifelees, it looks like a tight battle over the last week, good luck to all tribes involved
 

DeletedUser118888

Guest
Old news. I have always tried to protect and help the english speaking members that joined and now we are still together so all good for me.
 

mtg-ruud

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: Panda
Side 2:
Tribes: SINA, TDD!!, TDH!!, - U -

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 39
Side 2: 14
Difference: 25

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 134,961
Side 2: 50,129
Difference: 84,832

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Panda vs Panda is equal fight though
Side 1:
Tribes: Panda
Side 2:
Tribes: Panda

But they iz 14 caps ahead in their war with the barbs . . .

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 10
Side 2: 10
Difference: 0

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 35,831
Side 2: 35,831
Difference: 0

chart
 

DeletedUser107658

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: SARCOW, Panda
Side 2:
Tribes: TDD!!, TDH!!, Dest, SINA


Timeframe: Last week


Total conquers:


Side 1: 92
Side 2: 39
Difference: 53


chart



Total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 56
Side 2: 0
Difference: 56


chart



Points value of total conquers:


Side 1: 347,347
Side 2: 105,505
Difference: 241,842


chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 230,350
Side 2: 0
Difference: 230,350


chart
 
Top