@ITUDE Adjustment

  • Thread starter Deleted User - 4669627
  • Start date

DeletedUser

Guest
One month since the end of the NAP grace period;

Side 1:
Tribes: ~MW~
Side 2:
Tribes: ~@~, ~@2~

Timeframe: 15/02/2013 00:00:00 to 15/03/2013 07:23:06

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 470
Side 2: 37
Difference: 433

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4,213,148
Side 2: 334,919
Difference: 3,878,229

chart
 

DeletedUser49518

Guest
Maybe not interesting but if Fear is against MW then at least that wouldn't be disappointing.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
it is sure getting interesting, ex, @ and fear war with them three, interesting war with fear specially, they are defending and atacking. seems to me the only fun war i had after the one with @ in early game.. :p
 

DeletedUser40661

Guest
Maybe not interesting but if Fear is against MW then at least that wouldn't be disappointing.

They are, caught me by surprise even with the warning from FENIX :)

I'm 1-2 against them at the moment :(
 

DeletedUser

Guest
no wonder @ si losing so painfuly their members arent doing anything, trying to show their muscle on small rim tribes ( and failing ) cant believe they are still alive.
 

DeletedUser108821

Guest
Yeah, Fear? are set to overtake @'s 30 day war ODA in just 2 days.

It's a shame that they've kicked neilw4 for losing too many villages just so they can protect their war stats.
 

DeletedUser49518

Guest
That won't be the only one they kick to preserve their stats.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
It's not really about preserving stats, it's more about communication and skill.
"neilw4 left the tribe."
As you can see, he left the tribe instead of being dismissed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DeletedUser

Guest
He left the tribe

That won't be the only one they kick to preserve their stats.

LMAO! yeah. cuz so far we have been so obsessed with stats this world lol. I would say the giant embarrassment of crap timed nukes, no support following anything, the random wasting nukes into stacked targets with much lower morale... lol. So far your world status is ish deserved at best. Good luck changing that tho I will not hold my breath till you start kicking people ;)
 

DeletedUser

Guest
He left the tribe



LMAO! yeah. cuz so far we have been so obsessed with stats this world lol. I would say the giant embarrassment of crap timed nukes, no support following anything, the random wasting nukes into stacked targets with much lower morale... lol. So far your world status is ish deserved at best. Good luck changing that tho I will not hold my breath till you start kicking people ;)

Don't forget how they got that status! someone's gotta lead the fight on them evil barbs
green.png
Barbarian village (827|807) K8883Barbarian DannyJim [ANTs]2013-03-23 18:27:09
green.png
Barbarian village (821|804) K88101Barbarian DannyJim [ANTs]2013-03-23 17:48:20
green.png
Barbarian village (818|798) K782,401Barbarian eryao513 [ANTs]2013-03-23 17:13:23
green.png
Barbarian village (852|751) K781,785Barbarian einar [ANTs]2013-03-23 09:13:12
green.png
~DannyJim16 (828|807) K8883Barbarian DannyJim [ANTs]2013-03-23 08:42:03
green.png
~DannyJim17 (824|804) K88132Barbarian DannyJim [ANTs]2013-03-23 08:41:07
green.png
059 (804|751) K789,687Barbarian dawson 1701 [ANTs]2013-03-23 07:50:31
green.png
~DannyJim15 (825|809) K88198Barbarian DannyJim [ANTs]2013-03-23 02:50:14

not related to weak tribes, Quite high conquer rate in only 5 days.

Side 1:
Tribes: Fear?, Ex, ~@~, ~@2~
Side 2:
Tribes: ~MW~

Timeframe: 19/03/2013 00:00:00 to 23/03/2013 20:34:48

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 29
Side 2: 59
Difference: 30
 

DeletedUser40661

Guest
Fear has accounted for 60% of those conquers, I must say they are doing phenomenally well. Lets see how long it lasts...
 

Deleted User - 4669627

Guest
^^ yes, having attacked first (whereas ~@~ never launched an op), Fear? is losing by a much smaller margin than anybody could have predicted :icon_razz:

Side 1:
Tribes: ~MW~
Side 2:
Tribes: Fear?
Players: neilw4


Timeframe: 19/03/2013 00:00:00 to 24/03/2013 04:50:34


Total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 85
Side 2: 34
Difference: 51


chart



Points value of total conquers against opposite side:


Side 1: 766,554
Side 2: 307,141
Difference: 459,413


chart



i am curious, how did Fear? expect to fare?
several days into your war, after you initial op landed before, how did you expect these stats to read?
is this the expectation? better than expected? worse?

it is about get much worse :(


image.php


image.php
 

DeletedUser49518

Guest
However you want to serve it up, these stats need to be included in your war.

Side 1:

Tribes: ANTs
Side 2:
Tribes: Fear?

Timeframe: Forever

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 32
Side 2: 13
Difference: 19

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 273,181
Side 2: 90,466
Difference: 182,715

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i am curious, how did Fear? expect to fare?
several days into your war, after you initial op landed before, how did you expect these stats to read?
is this the expectation? better than expected? worse?

it is about get much worse :(
Considering how most of us are playing their first world, I'd say we're doing pretty well. We knew what to expect, but I'm kinda disappointed in some of our members. There's quite alot that decide to ignore tribe issues and mails (that, or they're inactive).

In any case, it's quite interesting up until now. I'm glad we are at least doing better than ~@~, which started the war with 29m points opposing to our 19m points.
 

DeletedUser40661

Guest
@ started the war with 25 mill I believe. I left prior to MW declaring war.
 
Top