Kata vs w40 (stats)

DeletedUser

Guest
Since kata seems to have taken on the mantle of being against the rest of the world maybe some stats are in order....

Given the recent upheavals I have just used a week period...

Any other tribes which wish to be included can post their own :)


Side 1:
Tribes: =CB=
Side 2:
Tribes: Kata, KataX

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 394
Side 2: 1,303
Difference: 909

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 28
Side 2: 73
Difference: 45

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: -WM-
Side 2:
Tribes: Kata, KataX

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 104
Side 2: 1,303
Difference: 1,199

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2
Side 2: 2
Difference: 0

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: Ahoy!!
Side 2:
Tribes: Kata, KataX

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 122
Side 2: 1,303
Difference: 1,181

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2
Side 2: 2
Difference: 0

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: T.B.K
Side 2:
Tribes: Kata, KataX

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 85
Side 2: 1,302
Difference: 1,217

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 0
Difference: 0

chart


But before you think this is all a bit mediocre, look at what Kata pressure has managed to accomplish... :icon_eek:


Side 1:
Tribes: =CB=
Side 2:
Players: Hogshead Standalone, Lyonene1

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 391
Side 2: 10
Difference: 381

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 0
Side 2: 0
Difference: 0

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
wow Hogshead Standalone & Lyonene1 only nobled 10

its hard times for CB
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Of course the fact that both of them are currently being account sat could have SOMETHING to do with it, but that would just make too much sense so why bring it up.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Of course the fact that both of them are currently being account sat could have SOMETHING to do with it, but that would just make too much sense so why bring it up.


Did I write "quit"? Huh maybe I need to learn to read and write again. I don't see that word in there. I see "account sat" but that's not "quit".
 

DeletedUser

Guest
None at the moment. I just keep up with what's going on in CB.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
I see "account sat" but that's not "quit".

But why go away and set a sitter at the same time they get incomings? :icon_eek: Sounds an awful lot like couldn't handle the pressure and quit to me... :icon_cool:

Also, while your telling us who is account sat in =CB= and therefore less likely to be effective at defending, fancy telling me thier real life locations, timezones, playing times, maybe a few personal commitments i should know about?

My god if you gave anymore away I'd be logging into their account next. :icon_wink:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Meh not to worry, hevisko has shown real form against the ex nms now tribeless players over the last few, cb will be proud :icon_rolleyes:

If only I was in tbk, I could take advantage of all the barbs appearing around me :icon_eek:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Meh not to worry, hevisko has shown real form against the ex nms now tribeless players over the last few, cb will be proud :icon_rolleyes:

If only I was in tbk, I could take advantage of all the barbs appearing around me :icon_eek:

Knowing you, you just might end up in TBK :icon_rolleyes:

Side 1:
Tribes: T.B.K
Side 2:
Tribes: Ahoy!!

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 108
Side 2: 3
Difference: 105

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,011,700
Side 2: 28,412
Difference: 983,288

chart
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Knowing you, you just might end up in TBK

No thanks, I would have to go back to farming to make nobles for all the grey and inactives :icon_eek:

Side 1:
Tribes: T.B.K
Side 2:
Players: RIP The Demon

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers:

Side 1: 547
Side 2: 0
Difference: 547

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 163
Side 2: 0
Difference: 163

chart


Amazing... :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: =CB=

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 974
Side 2: 263
Difference: 711

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 140
Side 2: 15
Difference: 125

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: T.B.K

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 974
Side 2: 131
Difference: 843

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1
Side 2: 0
Difference: 1

chart


Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: Ahoy!!

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers:

Side 1: 974
Side 2: 80
Difference: 894

chart


Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 9
Side 2: 1
Difference: 8

chart
 

iDesiR

Guest
Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: =CB=

Timeframe: Last week

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 140
Side 2: 15
Difference: 125

chart

100 of that taken from =CB= is fallout
We always keep our active players in our tribes regardless of what the stats look like .. unlike KATA .. remember Fufty.
We will only drop them if they become inactive, not because they lose villages.

We took 30 of Fufty's villages and then they dropped him .. we continued to take a further 160 villages before he deleted due to lack of support from his new buddies :lol:
Add that 160 in and stats over last few weeks will be more accurate.

.
 
Last edited:

DeletedUser

Guest
100 of that taken from =CB= is fallout
We always keep our active players in our tribes regardless of what the stats look like .. unlike KATA .. remember Fufty.
We will only drop them if they become inactive, not because they lose villages.

We took 30 of Fufty's villages and then they dropped him .. we continued to take a further 160 villages before he deleted due to lack of support from his new buddies
Add that 160 in and stats over last few weeks will be more accurate

None of which is relevant, this is a stats thread, these are the stats for the last week

Whatever manoeuvres are taking place behind the scenes will stay, behind the scenes :)

It's not like I can be accused of bias :icon_rolleyes:
 

DeletedUser

Guest
Time this was updated a touch:

Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: =CB=
Players: fallout1201, lamgoulen

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 514
Side 2: 290
Difference: 224

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 4,748,452
Side 2: 2,682,939
Difference: 2,065,513

chart


------------

Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: -WM-

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 2
Side 2: 4
Difference: 2

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 18,909
Side 2: 35,640
Difference: 16,731

chart


It will take a while to get a decent front up there, however I'm more than satisfied with this result so far considering that WM was after 400 villages from us :D
-----------

Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: K.O.H

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 221
Side 2: 13
Difference: 208

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,873,268
Side 2: 114,279
Difference: 1,758,989

chart


SW fun :)

----------
Side 1:
Tribes: Kata, KataX
Side 2:
Tribes: TiGER

Timeframe: Last month

Total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 165
Side 2: 1
Difference: 164

chart


Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

Side 1: 1,435,772
Side 2: 8,976
Difference: 1,426,796

chart


SE fun :)

----------

Other tribes may be added later.
 

DeletedUser

Guest
i really see no need in stats anymore. the next tribe to your family is a third of their size. after that, no one even compares. you have won the world. you can only hope that some one rises to the challenge, and is able to steal away some villages to you and get a good start before you notice and crush them back into place.

i hate to put it like that, but there is really no competition anymore unless you would split your tribe up, and we all know that wont happen.

in my thoughts though, i have always known Kata to kick players that are under attack. we always seemed to take about 20-30 vills, and then the player would be kicked.
 
Top