DeletedUser
Guest
Why dont you understand wot i am telling you when you lose all your troops, offensive and defensive and the attacker only loses his offensive troops you have lost the engagment, the bigger village always wins the trade off as they can rebuild quicker than you it's a game of chess ...... You cant return fire even if you want to and then you have to spend all your resources rebuilding troops and defenses.... i cant understand why you keep thinking thats a victory....duh.
If i scout you and you have troops i will attack you as you are more dangerous than a person without any troops can't you understand this basic concept.... When i scouted your players i choose to attack people that had the most to lose and there were people like Soul and Neo, I asked people to attack you because you were running wild with your smack attack in the forums. Soul of Darkness was a prime example of wot i am trying to explain to you but you dont seem to comprehend the idea. I scouted Xemerald and Soul of Darkness, Xemerald didn't have many troops so i decided to take out Soul instead as he had the more troops.... Take a look at his village now he is bottem of your members list seems my objective worked to my advantage dont you think, i then kept baiting him and drawing support to his village so i could take that out as well. I even nobled him untill he had 10 loyality and then we ran into trouble so i let him regroup. That was the same for most of the attacks, we only destroyed your troops to give us time to build more villages which will make us more powerfull and more able to attack again quicker than the second mosr powerful tribe in the continent. Every time you get attacked and have to rebuild you suffer a great lose which is time my friend. Time is the best ally to have on your team. Well we have a NAP now so lets not talk about wars, we are friends no... :lol: If you would like me to explain about the Art of War send me a text as my friend Atomic Kitten has said i should spend more time teaching other people how to play the game that way they will not make silly mistakes, again, feel free to mail me for advice Direngrey.
ps..... the Gap is very large now with only 54 players in GODS and 70 odd in KBC we are still 50k+ bigger ... hhhmmmm mission success me thinks.
If i scout you and you have troops i will attack you as you are more dangerous than a person without any troops can't you understand this basic concept.... When i scouted your players i choose to attack people that had the most to lose and there were people like Soul and Neo, I asked people to attack you because you were running wild with your smack attack in the forums. Soul of Darkness was a prime example of wot i am trying to explain to you but you dont seem to comprehend the idea. I scouted Xemerald and Soul of Darkness, Xemerald didn't have many troops so i decided to take out Soul instead as he had the more troops.... Take a look at his village now he is bottem of your members list seems my objective worked to my advantage dont you think, i then kept baiting him and drawing support to his village so i could take that out as well. I even nobled him untill he had 10 loyality and then we ran into trouble so i let him regroup. That was the same for most of the attacks, we only destroyed your troops to give us time to build more villages which will make us more powerfull and more able to attack again quicker than the second mosr powerful tribe in the continent. Every time you get attacked and have to rebuild you suffer a great lose which is time my friend. Time is the best ally to have on your team. Well we have a NAP now so lets not talk about wars, we are friends no... :lol: If you would like me to explain about the Art of War send me a text as my friend Atomic Kitten has said i should spend more time teaching other people how to play the game that way they will not make silly mistakes, again, feel free to mail me for advice Direngrey.
ps..... the Gap is very large now with only 54 players in GODS and 70 odd in KBC we are still 50k+ bigger ... hhhmmmm mission success me thinks.
Last edited by a moderator:
SO I WONT BE RESPONDSIBLE FOR ENDING THE NAP:icon_cry: BUT LIKE I SAID YALL EAGERNESS MATCHES MY OWN
