Sorry for late reply Campo... :icon_redface:
For any serious tribe recruiting without tribe leader approval is act of war. Khan had lot of spies in Royale, recruiting 2-3 their accounts that were in khan for just few days is not big risk for Royale. As long they obey us they can spy as much they want. As long we don't find out about. Then we need to restart them just for principle.
If a player wants to leave for another tribe, then maybe that player wasn't meant to be in your tribe from the beginning. Wouldn't you be happy if you lost players who might have bad loyalty to your tribe at a time when your tribe and the other is neutral? Makes it easier to plan things in the future. A player leaving in the middle of a war could destroy planned OPs, cause disorder and lower morale among remaining players and could lead to a bunch of D villages having to re-position which might take several hours/days and creates openings for the enemy to OP you at the same time. So, recruiting during war is worse than during neutral/peace time in that perspective.
Believe it or not, small and inactive me is part of the tribe council in Khan. I never heard the word spy or about info about defensless villages, etc.. coming from unknown sources. Only thing I knew was that no one was allowed to attack Teddy because he was neutral and a friend of some players. But if someone has admitted something, then well... nevermind me not knowing much about what's going around in this world. :icon_rolleyes:
So you are afaraid of recruiting a spy when you recruit from Khan? :icon_neutral:
Tribe that allow their members to deflect them without their proper reaction would not last long. For instance W2V did not allow their members to leave them unpunished. Contra did. Difference now is obvious.
The example i was talking about was if the player in question was and old friend/irl friend of someone in the other tribe. Of course leaving without reason isn't right. Every situation is unique and every decision about "taking care of" a player who joins another tribe has to be decided on individually, taking all things about he player, reason for leaving and the stance towards the other tribe and future plans into consideration.
I don't know how W2V handled their players who left, etc.. as you already might have figured out, I don't know much about what's going on in this world, lol... :lol:
But I do know that Contra got split up due to different players choices to leave and some ending up to fight each other etc. etc...
Even Khan recruited from Royale we tried to fix this out. NAP was offered if that person stop with attacks on us and give us back easy village he nobled from us. Reaction of Khan leader was that we need to be quite in order to not piss him off. Attacks on Royale continued. If you expected us to stay quite after that then your really funny guy. We OPed that person and rimed him. And we had full right to do so.
Well, thinking about the situation I guess we needed new targets, so an NAP probably wasn't very interesting? :icon_rolleyes:
As also mentioned, Khan and RoyalE leaders don't seem to be friends, so I guess that just contributed more towards the decision that was made. :icon_idea:
Of course we didn't know you would be a good fighting tribe either at that moment, which was why the war got into a stalemate kinda'. :icon_rolleyes:
And about the stay quite part... of course not! We expected a war to come (I guess? lol) and even if we didn't expect you to be as good as you were, we still expected some resistance. :icon_wink:
Im glad we agreed on something.
If mass propaganda mails from Khan leader is not enough you have always other proves about dirty strategy. Leaving their own tribe to hit them as they warring other tribes, using traitors and spies for defensive purpose against their own tribe (admitted by some ex khan members), recruiting neutral players in order to hit Royale/Contra from back (dozen of them including ones recruited in Khan!), taking deflectors account sit and mass mail Royale member in his name about how Kulajnics is unjust and how he refused to help him against Khan etc. Someone could say in war everything is acceptable. I saying otherwise. Honor you can loose only once.
Please explain the
bold part, didn't quite get that. Did we invite a player from RoyalE during the war that attacked you? The players recruited joined us after the war got stopped. The only player recrutied during the war was Takeshi which RoyalE recruited, if I don't remember wrong?Then again, I wasn't active during the war as you know. :icon_confused:
Now for the
italic part. Don't know how you are supposed to use spies against your own tribe?? Or did I misread that... anyway, names, names and names please. Just out of interest of course.
Just because we are at war, why shouldn't we be able to recruit neutral players? I mean, recruitment doesn't get stopped just because we go to war, I have never heard of such a thing. Either way, if we recruit a neutral player and he/she joins our tribe, then of course you can expect him/her to take part in the war. Don't see how that is dirty? :icon_neutral:
Hmmm, you sure this with the sit and mail stuff happened and not just a player experssing his/her thoughts on thier own? :icon_neutral:
I wonder how many players have lost their honour on this world already? Probably more than we know... :icon_cry:
There is personal agenda between our leaders. Thats more then enough i think. I don't think your leader like us very much. And lot of Khan members follow him in that one i am sure.
It's not good to have prejudices against a group of players, just because our leaders don't like each other that much. Does most of your players don't like Khan because your leader doesn't like our and perhapes our tribe? I don't think so. I have nothing against your tribe. I mean, hey... we are having a peaceful conversation on externals, can it get more friendly?
