Kicking Sand in Their Eyes!

Discussion in 'World 30' started by ReginaV, Mar 24, 2009.

Share This Page

  1. Bloodhood

    Bloodhood Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,852
    Likes Received:
    1
    Pointless to you maybe.

    Really?

     
  2. spleen mage

    spleen mage Contributing Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Then, why are you actually here trying to argue? Seeing as this is the subject of debate....You might not have agreed with the tone of other peoples posts, but least they were making a point. You're just here randomly trolling other people for making propaganda that you can't even deny is true....



    Actually, Pervis was right; Your posts in this thread are pointless.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  3. calmir

    calmir Guest

    36:10
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 11, 2009
  4. Bloodhood

    Bloodhood Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,852
    Likes Received:
    1
    This post and the previous just shows you haven't read what I said in my last posts. So why are you even trying to bother? Why would I try to bother argue that R.inc are not losing, stats speak louder than words. Please read what I've actually said before posting. If I have said to much, then just don't comment on what I say?

    Until that time, you have no right to comment on what and what is not pointless. Pervis said my one liners were pointless, of which I have made just two. Your post is the one which is pointless.

    Wouldn't you agree?
     
  5. spleen mage

    spleen mage Contributing Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    You haven't said anything of value; I know since I read your other posts. You've just trolled other players. I'l prove it.

    Here, you flamed Pervis, while not actually refuting any of his points; you simply picked on his usage of words and claimed they "didn't make sense"; well, you were wrong. They did.

    Again, here you show your poor grasp of the English language, by taking the word "miserable" literally (which is not how it is always used), then base the rest of the post on that moot point. And R.inc are not showing any great potential or outstanding activity.

    - The rest of the post, again trolling Pervis for his "tone".

    Again, trolling Pervis, I see a theme here. And making ridiculous statements; you didn't refute anything; like I mentioned earlier, the points you "refuted" were based on your misunderstanding of the words used.

    You even mention here that you're just pretty much here for the sake of arguing. Backing up my point.

    Again trolling Pervis for "kicking R.inc when it's down". Thats a perfectly legit propaganda technique, but you're not arguing any of his points, just his methods.

    The only post you made vaguely related to this thread. And it still stands; either BD knew that R.inc were attacking, or they didn't. One means that R.inc has a communication leak, and the other means they took BD by surprise and didn't achieve anything. Either one does not look good for them,

    Another trolling post. Note how you ignore everyone elses post, and hone in straight on Pervis's.


    Waste of space post. You never even refuted any of the "facts" anyway.....

    So I was right - All you've been doing in this thread is stalking/trolling Pervis for "his tone", for several pages. Only once did you even touch upon the entire point of this thread, and not once did you counter any of the points people made. Ergo, your posts are pointless.

    So....

    No.


    Edit:

    And Fyi.

    miserable   /ˈmɪzərəbəl, ˈmɪzrə-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [miz-er-uh-buhl, miz-ruh-] Show IPA
    –adjective 1. wretchedly unhappy, uneasy, or uncomfortable: miserable victims of war.
    2. wretchedly poor; needy.
    3. of wretched character or quality; contemptible: a miserable villain.
    4. attended with or causing misery: a miserable existence.
    5. manifesting misery.
    6. worthy of pity; deplorable: a miserable failure.
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  6. qwe4rty

    qwe4rty Guest

    A bit late (this thread grew several pages fast), but just a couple small things to clear up:

    Nope on two counts. Boo! did offer, but we've got no ceasefire between us. Though there might not be any active attacks going from side to side, neither one of us should be surprised if the other hits.

    As for moving support towards R.Inc, meh, I'll be honest, I haven't really had to since the initial strike. But more on that later.

    Yep. Even footing. Even so, much of the support coming into PinkyToe's villages hadn't yet landed due to distance.

    Nothing against you, I just love this line. It shows up everywhere on these boards :icon_wink:

    Anyways, we've seen the mails from their duke, we've seen the level of exasperation from the R.Inc council. Without trying to come across as arrogant right now, we're not really worried at the moment. War was declared by them on us. Despite the fact we found out before hand, it's important to note that the decision to war came from them. After the first wave or so, we've not really had to treat this like a war.

    And to be honest, we really have had no need to. We don't need to lower pressure on our members, and we aren't interested in pushing into k54. k55 will be taken care of by our members as they see fit. 10 to 1 may seem like a low number to some, but given the circumstances, I'm completely satisfied by it.

    Pretty much all I can do from here is wish R.Inc in a successful clean up and restructuring. While I've not been impressed much so far, I sincerely hope they are able to turn things around and prove me wrong. I don't mind being wrong, because in the end, it'll turn into more competition, and that's the whole reason I play this game. It's a win/win situation.
     
  7. k9burn

    k9burn Guest

    I assure you there has never been a ceasefire once it was lifted (a long time ago):

    Side 1:
    Tribes: BD
    Players:

    Side 2:
    Tribes: boo!
    Players:

    Timeframe: Last week

    Total conquers:

    Side 1: 82
    Side 2: 148
    Difference: 66

    [​IMG]

    Total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 3
    Side 2: 0
    Difference: 3

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers:

    Side 1: 510,576
    Side 2: 839,852
    Difference: 329,276

    [​IMG]

    Points value of total conquers against opposite side:

    Side 1: 26,891
    Side 2: 0
    Difference: 26,891

    [​IMG]

    ...and more is coming.
     
  8. quityelling

    quityelling Guest

    Not sure why anyone would want to come defend Ridz13. He's said some of the rudest things I've seen yet on these forums. The phrase "pathetic idiot" comes to mind. His words, not mine.
     
  9. Ridz 13

    Ridz 13 Guest

    well technically I seem to remember I only said that I'm retaliation to you saying I was bad and when I looked at your account /s they were just as bad possibly worse which does make you pathetic, for trolling soneone your not much better than. Besides that, make an on topic comment next yeh?
     
  10. Bloodhood

    Bloodhood Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,852
    Likes Received:
    1
    Too much to comment on, that I've already commented on. But my post was not a "flame", it was in response to Pervis who didn't say much new. If you don't understand that then your pretty stupid. Your first posts showed you didn't even know what I was going on about, now you finally read my posts and responded to try make yourself look good, but when several from BD and THE have already responded already, your only making yourself look worse as you derail the thread further.

    :icon_wink:
    Blood
     
  11. spleen mage

    spleen mage Contributing Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    Er....seriously, what are you babbling on about?


    Firstly, Pervis's post was relevant to the thread. Yours wasn't; you responded to him, but you never actually countered any of the points that were to do with this thread, you simply tried to criticise his use of wording. Yes, it was flame.

    Yes, I'm "pretty stupid", thanks for bringing that to light :icon_rolleyes:.

    I was under the assumption that no-one would waste that much time arguing against someone if they didn't disagree with the points they were making; after all, that's pure pointlessness. I also assumed that you might actually be trying to make a point, rather then simply trying to flame people for their "tone", or "being harsh".

    Obviously, I was mistaken on both counts.


    I'd already read your posts :icon_rolleyes: And, I only wish for you to leave this thread, so we can get back to discussing the war, and not be interrupted by your constant flamings and whinings of "omgz your too harsh!!!" while not adding anything at all relevant to the thread.

    Leave this thread to people that actually have an opinion. You've already made it clear that you either don't, or do not wish to voice it.
     
  12. Bloodhood

    Bloodhood Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,852
    Likes Received:
    1
    1. What am I babbling on about? Do you ever understand anything?
    2. My post was relevent to his post which I have every right of doing. Now look at what your doing, commenting on my post from a 3rd perspective. Who is worse I wonder?
    3. I said IF you don't understand, which you seemingly don't.
    4. I had already left the thread, so that's a large failure on your part for bringing me back :lol:
     
  13. spleen mage

    spleen mage Contributing Poster

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4,560
    Likes Received:
    0
    I understand people that post coherently. It's not my comprehension skills that are at fault, you just lack the ability to write in a clear manner.

    The difference is; he made good points relevant to the thread. You just chose to ignore them. All you did was picked his apart for his language, which had nothing to do with the thread, other then derailing it.

    Now I can't comment on your opinions, since you don't have any. If you had a single valid point, I would be more then happy to counter it. Though I like how you seem to avoid the points I also make, and simply resort to name calling (hypocrite much?). I see a theme here.


    Again, I'm not at fault if you are incapable of making sense.

    Ahhh, typical childish comeback. Considering the first post in which you replied to me, you had already replied to Pervis, I highly doubt you had "already left the thread".

    Now - do you have an opinion on this war? Care to make one?
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2009
  14. bigbadsanta

    bigbadsanta Guest


    boo! and BD don't have a ceasefire, i am not sure of there status with us, but we do not consider them as enemies anymore and removed them from the enemy list.


    ReginaV............now read it backwards...........Vaginer.


    Would a girl seriously name themselves after a vaginer? I doubt it.

    I'd say most players are perfectly correct in assuming Regina is a guy pretending to be a girl.
     
  15. Ridz 13

    Ridz 13 Guest


    If you think ReginaV spells Vaginer backwards, you have serious problems.

    Way to look stupid :icon_rolleyes:
     
  16. calmir

    calmir Guest

    Way to decend to a new level of immaturity and idiocy BBS.
     
  17. bigbadsanta

    bigbadsanta Guest

    It is not spelt exactly correct, i know.

    But it is an unlikely coincidence, is it not?

    I just pointed it out as 1 of the reasons i believe she is not a girl.
     
  18. Bloodhood

    Bloodhood Part of the Furniture

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Messages:
    6,852
    Likes Received:
    1
    So why respond to me? Hmmmm...

    The whole point of my argument was that he made the same old same old points but in a much more insulting and harsh way.


    Well the argument was basically over. And if we assume that you are right, would you posting even more really make me leave the thread? No, I thought not.

    R.inc didn't do well, they need to improve. Isn't that everyone's opinion?

    And bbs, though I did actually laugh at the observation made, on closer inspection ReginaV is not Vaginer backwards. It is actually Vaniger. :icon_wink:
     
  19. Ridz 13

    Ridz 13 Guest

    You keep telling BH he's making off topic conversations. So are you. How about you both get back on topic :)
    And BH has already made more than one opinion on the war :)
     
  20. Ridz 13

    Ridz 13 Guest

    No its not a coincidence. As has just been pointed out, you made the stupid mistake of thinking ReginaV (Which stands for Regina Vampira, as you obviously don't know, making accusations that it is Vagina spelt backwards [NB Vagina is spelt Vagina not Vaginer i believe]), once again proving why your one of the many idiot haunting the forums.(i'm one, i know, but its nice to be able to say this to someone else once in a while ^^) Therefore, how can it be a coincidence, when its not even spelt the same?!