This post and the previous just shows you haven't read what I said in my last posts. So why are you even trying to bother? Why would I try to bother argue that R.inc are not losing, stats speak louder than words. Please read what I've actually said before posting. If I have said to much, then just don't comment on what I say?
You haven't said anything of value; I know since I read your other posts. You've just trolled other players. I'l prove it.
PeRvis get out of your own arse will you?
*rest of post*
Here, you flamed Pervis, while not actually refuting any of his points; you simply picked on his usage of words and claimed they "didn't make sense"; well, you were wrong. They did.
And yet I have spoken to R.inc players who are lively, active and nice to talk to. But ofcourse R.inc is 'miserable'. So a tribe of new players are miserable even if they have great potential, activity and get along great? No, I don't think so.
Again, here you show your poor grasp of the English language, by taking the word "miserable" literally (which is not how it is always used), then base the rest of the post on that moot point. And R.inc are not showing any great potential or outstanding activity.
- The rest of the post, again trolling Pervis for his "tone".
I was just proving everything you said could be refuted. And when someone is being an absolute ... I do in fact like to make it my business. I never defended R.inc's ability at fighting a war. Merely I attacked the way you decided to attack others on this forum. It is precisely the tone and the insulting nature of the post that I was posting against. We all know I am no "white knight", but will I just watch arrogant posts that are often inaccurate, over the top and insulting? No, I won't.
Again, trolling Pervis, I see a theme here. And making ridiculous statements; you didn't refute anything; like I mentioned earlier, the points you "refuted" were based on your misunderstanding of the words used.
You even mention here that you're just pretty much here for the sake of arguing. Backing up my point.
Because obviously I am the politest person you've ever spoken to. Ever heard the phrase, never kick a man when he's down? Seeing you go on about R.inc like that isn't really entertaining really, just pretty boring. I did not post to jump in to defend Vampira against you calling her a man, I posted because your post was so over the top and arrogant that I just thought it needed to be refuted by someone other than Ridz. The fact that it required 5 separate people had to jump in and respond to what I said, quite clearly indicates that I succeeded in my goal. And when I see none of them deny what you said was over the top and not necessary, it only reinforces that indication.
Again trolling Pervis for "kicking R.inc when it's down". Thats a perfectly legit propaganda technique, but you're not arguing any of his points, just his methods.
Lol, Iceman, sorry, but I expected more... is it not true that actually, BD and CRY had already discussions going to remove R.inc from K55? At least, that is what was said on the CRY forums. BD knew what was happening, 'unprepared' doesn't come into it.
The only post you made vaguely related to this thread. And it still stands; either BD knew that R.inc were attacking, or they didn't. One means that R.inc has a communication leak, and the other means they took BD by surprise and didn't achieve anything. Either one does not look good for them,
O dear Pervis. O dear...
I'm sorry, but number doesn't come into it. Kicking a man when their down was exactly what you were trying to do, even if it was just one post. Just because as you say "once" you post against them doesn't reduce that fact.
You can shout PeRvIs but I'm not seeing this good posting that I have been told you are capable of.
Another trolling post. Note how you ignore everyone elses post, and hone in straight on Pervis's.
Facts? Once again, o dear...
Waste of space post. You never even refuted any of the "facts" anyway.....
So I was right - All you've been doing in this thread is stalking/trolling Pervis for "his tone", for several pages. Only once did you even touch upon the entire point of this thread, and not once did you counter any of the points people made. Ergo, your posts are pointless.
So....
No.
Edit:
And Fyi.
miserable /ˈmɪzərəbəl, ˈmɪzrə-/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [miz-er-uh-buhl, miz-ruh-] Show IPA
–adjective 1. wretchedly unhappy, uneasy, or uncomfortable: miserable victims of war.
2. wretchedly poor; needy.
3. of wretched character or
quality; contemptible: a miserable villain.
4. attended with or causing misery: a miserable existence.
5. manifesting misery.
6. worthy of pity; deplorable: a miserable failure.