Lord Noj
Guest
Here is the issue:
My tribe has a rule that whilst in war the tribe does not take barbarians or bonus villages.
The rule is abused by most members of the tribe but the tribal leadership metes out punishments to smaller players by nobling their villages to make an example of them. However despite this larger players and leaders freely noble barbs without any "punishment"
Would the forum consider this a reasonable rule or just an excuse to allow tribal leaders to take smaller tribal members villages.
I might add that I have just taken a bonus village near to me as I only have one village. As an active player and actively supporting larger players I am not large enough to grow quickly with only one mixed village. Interestingly my glorious leader is the one attacking me and nobling my village. (I should point out that he also has ALL my support troops in his villages defending against attack. This he knows and has used this advantage to take my village)
Comments please
My tribe has a rule that whilst in war the tribe does not take barbarians or bonus villages.
The rule is abused by most members of the tribe but the tribal leadership metes out punishments to smaller players by nobling their villages to make an example of them. However despite this larger players and leaders freely noble barbs without any "punishment"
Would the forum consider this a reasonable rule or just an excuse to allow tribal leaders to take smaller tribal members villages.
I might add that I have just taken a bonus village near to me as I only have one village. As an active player and actively supporting larger players I am not large enough to grow quickly with only one mixed village. Interestingly my glorious leader is the one attacking me and nobling my village. (I should point out that he also has ALL my support troops in his villages defending against attack. This he knows and has used this advantage to take my village)
Comments please
Last edited: