king ziggy the 2
Hehe, sorry to spoil your fun Feud :icon_wink:
Very well said mate, I couldn't agree more.Or, don't fail to use the safety net. The fault lies with the player. Whether we think their rules are draconian or not, the player accepted them by joining and he failed to comply.
The player in question wasn't really playing. He was logging in on occasion to look at his pretty buildings. He took one village from another player over the course of nearly a year. In 3 months of war, he accomplished nothing at all. Those villages and that tribal slot are far better utilized by someone who actually plays. If he had been aggressive, active and useful, but then suddenly was off-line for 4 days, kicking and eating him would be harsh. He was passive, only nominally active and useless.
I don't want players like that in the game, even in an enemy tribe because I know that when I take their villages, I'll have to spend a week fixing them and taking them will be as exciting as watching paint dry.
I think that's fair enough. Better off letting other tribes members noble them and actually put the villages to good use instead of them sitting there doing nothing because they belong to some inactive/semi-active n00b.1. you went red, I remember, I suggested you get booted ...
2. you nobled only abandoned ...
You were worth more to us booted and nobled than actually in the tribe ...
Enough said, stop crying